|
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 03:51 PM by SoCalDem
It's common knowledge that consumer debt is at an all-time high, and that we have (and the rest of the world has) cut back in our spending.
Bailing out GM, Chrysler & Ford may be necessary, but it's like giving a piece of iceberg lettuce to a person dying of malnutrition.
"Consumers" get their "spending money" in very few ways..
1..earn it at a job 2..inherit it 3..steal it 4..borrow it
I know some will say, that many people live on interest from investments, but right about now, that's becoming less and less likely to continue, and really..how many people in your immediate circle are independently wealthy from "investments" that THEY made?..(cannot count "family money")
#2 accounts for the very tippy-top of our consumer base, and those folks do spend a LOT of money, but even they can only buy so much
#3 "works" for a little while, but eventually most of them end up getting caught, and their "consuming" days come to an abrupt end
#4 has become the modus operandi for many, if not most of us, for a long time, and has toxic "end-game" consequences for millions of "former consumers".
#1 is the only sustainable method for keeping an economy healthy, but if "things" cost more and more, and employers want to pay workers less and less, there is a "crash-point"..
If the numbers I have read are true, there is at least a $2 trillion debt in consumer spending. This is money owed to "someone", for "something".
Instead of giving cash to the people who are OWED, wouldn't a more sustainable "fix" be to "give" the money to the people who OWE, with the caveat, that it is for debt reduction to the entities that are owed.
The money ends up in the same place, but it has an added benefit, of paying OFF the debts at the same time.
This does NOT apply to obvious circumstances, such as land speculators, gamblers, etc...but to the rank and file 'consumers" who have been spinning those plates for decades, just trying to keep them from all crashing..trying to keep kids in school keep a roof over their heads, trying to buy food, keeping autos running..you know...USING all those "services" that make up our "service economy".
As all "good" bailouts go, this would have to have limitations and regulations , and would be a ONE TIME "pass go, and collect" initiative.
Part of the "deal" would be for ALL credit accounts to be closed for an interim period, while there is a true sorting out of which consumers would regain credit, and which would not.
Believe it or not, there WAS a time when banks did quite well without every customer having a wallet full of credit cards.
If a family had been paying several hundreds of dollars every month to credit card companies, that money would now be freed up to actually BUY stuff they needed. .. available to replace aging cars, repair "sick" cars, to pay college tuition, to maybe even take a vacation,and spur on economies of vacation-spots.
To get our economy moving, money has to be in the hands of the people who buy "the stuff".
There also needs to be a floor and a ceiling for mortgage debt and for credit cards, for the ones who actually qualify for credit..and for credit cards, there needs to be realistic LIMITS to credit offered and approved. It's lunacy to give an unemployed 18 yr old college student a credit card with thousands of dollars of "available credit"..and to give them multiple "brands" of credit cards.
|