Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

why does Obama have to give up his Blackberry?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:48 PM
Original message
why does Obama have to give up his Blackberry?
I don't understand why the Secret Service is making him give it up. Is there a technical reason for it?

I can't live without my iPhone and laptop. If I don't have a connection to the internet, I feel lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cellphones can be traced even when off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. He gets one of these...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. partly security, partly the presidential records
not that this stopped bush and company from destroying emails and all that you know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
margotb822 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. The president's emails are part of the record
Remember how all of those Valerie Plame emails "disappeared?" Part of the question is how to keep his BB emails as part of the record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Even private emails to family, etc?
That's a huge invasion of privacy. I wouldn't want anyone 50 years from now reading my emails to my family members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Mail's a sieve
Every electron going from that thing to, well, anywhere would probably get intercepted by somebody for one reason or another.

The guy's going to be in the spotlight enough as is without Fox News surrounding all his relatives' houses with packet sniffers looking for something to misinterpret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. wouldn't encryption protect personal emails? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Even encryption's fallible
Couple that with the fact that everyone he emails would have to have the key to decrypt it (and know how to do that!) and access to it would probably become an open secret to an obsessed-enough reporter soon enough.

You'd also have the potential issue in that case of the president sending encrypted messages out of the White House, which would open up all sorts of cans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yes, his private life stopped the moment he won the election
it is part of the package

Not that email survives the way I don't know, diaries do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. The best recent example of why everything has to go through
and be retained by the White House and government is Gov. Sarah Palin and her multiple email accounts that may or mayn't have emails that may or mayn't be Alaskan government related.

More simply put. Send everything to government archives so the Republicans can't whine and kwetch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. i don't think that private/family emails would be part of the record.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Being President really *is* different . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
12. no more time to fiddle with it plus someone else will be performing those chores...
is my guess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
14. Both the US and Israel have the tech needed to use cellphone signals for targetted murders.
And do so as a matter of routine. The SS probably thinks that having a bulls eye target painted on Obama will make their job a bit harder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
15. He doesn't need to get rid of it.
Bush doesn't believe in the Presidential records act...and neither does Obama, he will prove this when he doesn't prosecute Bush for violation such laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC