From KosSince Barack Obama apparently made clear that he didn't want any purges in the Senate, and had his faithful Senate lieutenants Durbin and Kerry deliver that message to the Democratic caucus, can we assume that the same applies for the executive branch -- you know, the branch of government that Obama will actually lead?
Since he doesn't want "purges" to be the order of the day, perhaps he'll make sure to keep the thousands of Bush appointees in their respective offices, from Cabinet secretaries on down? That would only be consistent with his meddling in the Senate.
So Paulson and Rice and Gates and the rest of that crowd will apparently stay on, as will countless of other political appointees down the list? Sorry Hillary. No Secretary of State for you. Can't be seen as holding grudges!
Elections have consequences, one of them being that the victors get to get to carry out the will of the voters. So if the public rejects Bush, McCain, the war in Iraq, and incompetence during Katrina, then the incoming government gets to remove those who enabled the policies that have been rejected.
More at link