Mike Huckabee has said that gays and lesbians do not need protection of their civil rights, because they have not been the victims of systematic violence like racial minorities.
http://www.towleroad.com/2008/11/huckabee-gays-n.htmlI wonder what Mike Huckabee has been smoking.
I. Nazi Germany There were several different kinds of triangles which the Nazis forced enemies of the state to wear. We all know about the yellow double triangle---a Star of David---for the Jews. A red triangle meant that you were a communist or political enemy.
A pink triangle was for a homosexual.
Here is a site called
Nazi Persecution of Homosexuals that Huckabee ought to read.
http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/online/hsx/If he did, he would find out that 15,000 gay men died in Nazi concentration camps alongside other victims of the Holocaust. Hundreds of gay men were forcibly castrated. 100,000 were arrested and 50,000 were sent to prison while others were confined to mental institutions as “insane”.
Nazi Germany did not seek to kill all homosexuals. Nevertheless, the Nazi state, through active persecution, attempted to terrorize German homosexuals into sexual and social conformity, leaving thousands dead and shattering the lives of many more.
You can take this last paragraph and insert the name of just about any western country---including ours.
II. The Inquisition If you like to read history, here is something for you.
http://books.google.com/books?id=y8_Ya2s3zN8C&pg=PA192&lpg=PA192&dq=Inquisition+homosexuals&source=web&ots=4LzPMz9R4T&sig=xSHrMCR7WcUC9YzJY3Q7TaUt8Yw&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=7&ct=resultThe author makes the case that the Inquisition latched onto sodomy or homosexuality as another crime it could persecute in the early 16th century for political reasons. Note that gays were sentenced to death (often by burning) in secular courts all across Europe, as well, and that in some places being gay had been a capital offense as far back as the Middle Ages. England continued to execute gays into the 18th century.
Intolerance of homosexuality had lots of uses. It could justify the enslavement of the native people of the Americas by the Spanish Conquistadors and their friends in the Church.
http://academic.reed.edu/english/Courses/English341gs/FinalPaper/MeganL/berdache_web.html This apparent and intrinsic relationship between homosexual relations and their religious activity was deeply troubling to the Spanish conquerors. It added to their beliefs that the natives were devils, and it caused an even stronger gap to separate the two groups. Because sodomy was present in the religious realm of the natives, Trexler argues that in their contemporary legal view, "sodomy or male homosexual behavior, however, did bestow a right to conquer, if it could be demonstrated that it was widespread and tolerated by indigenous civil authority" (Trexler, 83-4). The punishment of the "sodomites" by the Spanish is well documented and is clearly revealed in de Bry's etching of "Balboa's Dogs Attacking a Group of Panamanian Sodomites."
III. Joe McCarthy Here is an interview with David K. Johnson, the author of
The Lavender Scare a book about the attack on gays and lesbians that was waged by the people who terrorized America in their quest to weed out communist subversives.
http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/404811in.htmlAccording to Johnson, under Roosevelt and Truman, the federal government and the DC area had become relatively friendly to gays. The same folks who tried to turn the country abruptly towards the right during the Cold War decided to play upon the nation’s fear of homosexuals by starting a gay witch hunt. They purged thousands of government workers who were gay, forced many others to quit rather than endure interrogations. They also caused thousands of private sector employees to lose their jobs, because they could no longer get a security clearance. Homosexuality was supposed to make an employee subject to communist blackmail, you see. Also,
A variation on the blackmail rationale—one expressed in many tabloid journals of the 1950s—held that communists promoted "sex perversion" among American youth as a way to weaken the country and clear the path for a communist takeover. In this line of reasoning, homosexuals (especially effeminate gay men) acted as a fifth column, by preventing family formation and fostering moral decay.
Purity of Essence, anyone?
IV. The American Medical Association Until 1973, the AMA declared that gays were mentally ill. Hard to believe, but true.
In 1952, the American Psychiatric Association listed homosexuality in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) as a sociopathic personality disturbance. A comprehensive study of homosexuality in 1962 justified inclusion of the disorder as a pathological hidden fear of the opposite sex that was caused by traumatic parent-child relationships. This view was widely influential in the medical profession.<11> In 1956, however, Evelyn Hooker performed a study that compared the happiness and well-adjusted nature of self-identified homosexual men with heterosexual men and found no difference.<12> Her study stunned the medical community and made her a hero to many gay men and lesbians,<13> but homosexuality remained in the DSM until 1973.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonewall_riotsHere is a list of sociopathic personality characteristics:
http://www.geocities.com/lycium7/psychofacts.html 1. Superficial charm and good intelligence
2. Shallow emotions and lack of empathy, guilt, or remorse
3. Behaviours indicative of little life plan or order
4. Failure to learn from experience and absence of anxiety
5. Unreliability, insincerity, and untruthfulness
Who is going to trust a gay person if the medical community says that homosexuals are all liars who lack empathy or guilt, they never learn and they live for the moment, they can persuade anyone to do anything and they are advocates of chaos? That’s as good definition of
the devil as you will ever hear.
Who is the most infamous sociopath?
Imagine living in a world where you are constantly being compared to Charles Manson---or child rapists or embezzlers---because you want to marry John instead of Jane.
V. Stonewall, Or Gays Have Battled Police Brutality In the Streets of America, Too http://socialistalternative.org/literature/stonewall.htmlAfter centuries of being forced into the closet, burned at the stake, castrated, stripped of employment and told that they were insane, gay people had just about had enough. In the 1960s, when every other oppressed group in the United States decided to stand up for its civil rights, homosexuals decided that they deserved the same rights. In 1969, when NYC police decided to shake down a gay bar in Greenwich Village (just business as usual for New York's finest) the patrons decided to fight back.
Pine ordered his subordinates to retreat into the empty bar, which they proceeded to trash as well as savagely beating a heterosexual folk singer who had the misfortune to pass the doorway at that moment. At the end of the evening, a teenager had lost two fingers from having his hand slammed in a car door. Others received hospital treatment following assaults with police billy clubs. The historian of the riots, Martin Duberman, claims that the police singled out "camp," or "feminine," young men for special treatment.
Snip
People in the crowd started shouting "Gay Power!" And as word spread through Greenwich Village and across the city, hundreds of gay men and lesbians, black, white, Hispanic, and predominantly working class, converged on the Christopher Street area around the Stonewall Inn to join the fray. The police were now reinforced by the Tactical Patrol Force (TPF), a crack riot-control squad which had been specially trained to disperse people protesting against the Vietnam War.
Duberman describes the scene as the two dozen "massively proportioned" TPF riot police advanced down Christopher Street, arms linked in Roman Legion-style wedge formation: "In their path, the rioters slowly retreated, but - contrary to police expectations - did not break and run ... hundreds ... scattered to avoid the billy clubs but then raced around the block, doubled back behind the troopers, and pelted them with debris. When the cops realized that a considerable crowd had simply re-formed to their rear, they flailed out angrily at anyone who came within striking distance.
"But the protestors would not be cowed. The pattern repeated itself several times: The TPF would disperse the jeering mob only to have it re-form behind them, yelling taunts, tossing bottles and bricks, setting fires in trash cans.
Another source describes the reaction that night:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonewall_riots We all had a collective feeling like we'd had enough of this kind of shit. It wasn't anything tangible anybody said to anyone else, it was just kind of like everything over the years had come to a head on that one particular night in the one particular place, and it was not an organized demonstration.... Everyone in the crowd felt that we were never going to go back. It was like the last straw. It was time to reclaim something that had always been taken from us.... All kinds of people, all different reasons, but mostly it was total outrage, anger, sorrow, everything combined, and everything just kind of ran its course. It was the police who were doing most of the destruction. We were really trying to get back in and break free. And we felt that we had freedom at last, or freedom to at least show that we demanded freedom. We weren't going to be walking meekly in the night and letting them shove us around—it's like standing your ground for the first time and in a really strong way, and that's what caught the police by surprise. There was something in the air, freedom a long time overdue, and we're going to fight for it. It took different forms, but the bottom line was, we weren't going to go away. And we didn't.
And that, Mike Huckabee, is about as good a description as you will ever hear of what makes people join a civil rights struggle.