Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Paulson was behind the Martial Law threat? Inhofe says Treasury Secretary made dire warnings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 06:05 PM
Original message
Paulson was behind the Martial Law threat? Inhofe says Treasury Secretary made dire warnings
Edited on Thu Nov-20-08 06:12 PM by seemslikeadream
Speaking on Tulsa Oklahoma 1170 KFAQ when asked by host Pat Campbell who was behind the threats of martial law and civil unrest if the bailout failed Senator James Inhofe named Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson as the source.



Has anyone else heard of this?



FOUND IT




http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/jobless-claims-jump-16-year-high/story.aspx?guid=%7B4042254D-1594-44AB-9DFF-768228795ED4%7D&dist=SecMKTW

Paulson Was Behind Bailout Martial Law Threat; Inhofe says Treasury Secretary made dire warnings in conference call on September 19th


Senator James Inhofe has revealed that Henry Paulson was behind the threats of martial law and a new great depression prior to the passage of the bailout bill, having made such warnings during a conference call on September 19th, around two weeks before the legislation was eventually approved by both the Senate and Congress.

As we reported at the time, on October 2, Democratic Congressman Brad Sherman gave a stunning speech on the House floor during which he decried the fact that, “Many of us were told in private conversations that if we voted against this bill on Monday that the sky would fall, the market would drop two or three thousand points the first day, another couple of thousand the second day, and a few members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted no.”
A few days before, Rep. Michael Burgess also told the House, “Mr. Speaker I understand we are under Martial Law as declared by the speaker last night,” referring to a temporary suspension of the rules and procedures of Congress by its leaders so that a bill can be passed quickly.
But the origin of the most dire warnings about physical martial law in America, to which Sherman was likely referring, has now been exposed.
Speaking on Tulsa Oklahoma’s 1170 KFAQ, when asked who was behind threats of martial law and civil unrest if the bailout bill failed, Senator James Inhofe named Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson as the source.

“Somebody in D.C. was feeding you guys quite a story prior to the bailout, a story that if we didn’t do this we were going to see something on the scale of the depression, there were people talking about martial law being instituted, civil unrest….who was feeding you guys this stuff?,” asked host Pat Campbell.

“That’s Henry Paulson,” responded Inhofe, “We had a conference call early on, it was on a Friday I think – a week and half before the vote on Oct. 1. So it would have been the middle … what was it – the 19th of September, we had a conference call. In this conference call – and I guess there’s no reason for me not to repeat what he said, but he said – he painted this picture you just described. He said, ‘This is serious. This is the most serious thing that we faced.’”
Inhofe said that Paulson told members of Congress the crisis would be “far worse than the great depression” if Congress didn’t authorize the bill to buy out toxic debt, a proposal “which he abandoned the day after he got the money,” added Inhofe.
Inhofe is referring to the controversy last week when it emerged that the bailout money was not going to buy up toxic debt but instead Paulson, the former CEO of Goldman Sachs, had pulled a bait and switch and ordered the money be injected directly into banks.
Senator Inhofe has slammed the secrecy surrounding the destination of the bailout money, saying that Hank Paulson could have given it to his friends and that the “blank check” must be cancelled now.

Inhofe is now trying to rally support for a freeze on what’s left of the initial $350 billion of bailout money with his “roll back the bailout” proposal, which will also require an affirmative vote on the part of Congress to approve Treasury’s plan for the remaining $350 billion.
Watch the clip from Inhofe’s interview below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Makes sense. If everything is going up in flames, chances are he'd want to protect his Jag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. James "I am Outraged at the Outrage" Inhofe
The people that support this guy must really be something...Scary..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lumpsum Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Everyone MUST read that Naomi Wolf book.
To think what almost happened to this country by the neo-cons and the PNAC scoundrels. Luckily, their own incompetence caused their downfall. Still, we have A LOT of picking up to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. And exactly what authority did Paulsen have to
Edited on Thu Nov-20-08 07:48 PM by malaise
make such a threat? He should be locked up in chains.

The most interesting thing I saw on TV that Friday was when GHW Bush arrived - Prescott would have been proud -just saying.

add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC