Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nuclear weapons use more likely in future: US intelligence

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 09:43 PM
Original message
Nuclear weapons use more likely in future: US intelligence
Yahoo News
Jim Mannion
Thu Nov 20, 3:45 pm ET

WASHINGTON (AFP) – The use of nuclear weapons will grow increasingly likely by 2025, US intelligence predicted Thursday in a report on global trends that forecasts a tense, unstable world shadowed by war.

"The world of the near future will be subject to an increased likelihood of conflict over scarce resources, including food and water, and will be haunted by the persistence of rogue states and terrorist groups with greater access to nuclear weapons," said the report.

"Widening gaps in birth rates and wealth-to-poverty ratios, and the uneven impact of climate change, could further exacerbate tensions," it concludes.

Called "Global Trends 2025 - a Transformed World," the 121-page report was produced by the National Intelligence Council, a body of analysts from across the US intelligence community.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20081120/pl_afp/usintelligenceforecastnuclear;_ylt=AnGSwxiJJk.GFMv45zWDIZOs0NUE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't agree.
The longer that we go without anyone using nukes, the greater the impediment is to anyone being the first to pull the trigger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Since the US is the only country to use nukes,
and the only country who continues to do so, I would have to say that if the US military says so, they are inevitably correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nukes are not a deterrent
when you release a Nuke you nuke yourself and the whole planet

and they have been baby nuking Iraq and Afghanistan and they still are losing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "baby nuking"?
that makes no sense in this context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC