Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whistleblower: Aide Reported On Siegelman Case To "Recused" U.S. Attorney "Every Day"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 06:36 PM
Original message
Whistleblower: Aide Reported On Siegelman Case To "Recused" U.S. Attorney "Every Day"
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/whistleblower_aide_reported_on.php

Whistleblower: Aide Reported On Siegelman Case To "Recused" U.S. Attorney "Every Day"
By Zachary Roth - November 21, 2008, 6:13PM


The New York Times has more details about the possible continued involvement of the U.S. Attorney in the prosecution of former Alabama Democratic governor Don Siegleman, even after she had formally recused herslef form ghe case because her husband was a GOP operative who had run the gubernatorial campaign of Siegelman's opponent.

The paper reports allegations made in a sworn affidavit by a whistleblower in the office, Tamarah Grimes, about the involvement of U.S. Attorney Leura Canary. Time had reported similar claims earlier this month -- in response to which Siegelman expressed outrage in an interview with TPMmuckraker.

Says the Times:

{I}n her complaint, the Justice Department employee, Tamarah T. Grimes, cited several instances suggesting Ms. Canary maintained a close watch on the case. Ms. Grimes said a legal aide in the office reported on Mr. Siegelman's trial to Ms. Canary or her top deputy "every day, sometimes several times per day by telephone." Once, she observed Ms. Canary "frantically pacing in the executive suite" after a courtroom blowup, "pleading with someone" to get on the phone to "tell Louis he has to control his temper."

Ms. Grimes also disclosed an e-mail message written by Ms. Canary commenting on legal strategy in the case and suggesting to aides that Mr. Siegelman not be allowed to "comment on court activities in the media." Ms. Grimes, who is also in an dispute with the department related to her allegations that the Siegelman prosecution team had harrassed her, cited the affidavit of a former legal aide in the Montgomery office, Elizabeth Jane Crooks, who wrote that "the morning that the trial started, the U.S. attorney herself carried food and beverage over to the courthouse to support the 'Trial Team.' "


The Times also reports that lawyers for Siegelman, whose appeal begins next month in Atlanta court, have made new filings based on Grimes' claims.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Justice, Chimpolini Style.
AKA Criminal abuse of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Boy Howdy I am glad this is getting some of the attention
it deserves. Surely the Idiot Son can't pardon EVERYONE who broke the law...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Flying Monkeys are writing the pardons as we speak.
List is growing, sounds like.
And they do have those "automatic pen signatures" now.
Hell, Bush could be in Paraquay and the pardons would still get signed in DC.

Kudos to TPM for all the work on this case. too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. K & R for keeping Don Siegelman's case on the BURNER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. The book really needs to be thrown at this woman.
They do hedge their bets. I've heard them around here, before they do something that crosses the line, say, "Oh, a judge would never expect a common citizen to know so and so." I wouldn't be surprised if this woman felt emboldened because she was a woman and thought she could get away with things that a man wouldn't get away with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC