cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-22-08 08:19 AM
Original message |
Trivia question: Who did Samantha Power recently marry? |
|
no rushing off to wiki to cheat.
|
Adelante
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-22-08 08:22 AM
Response to Original message |
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-22-08 08:23 AM
Response to Original message |
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-22-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-22-08 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. I designated that as his nickname. |
|
;-)
That and he is nonchalant about abuse of constitutional checks and balances.
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-22-08 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. I've actually read quite a bit of Sunstein's writing. |
|
thoughtful guy. And just how do you know he's a creep? Long personal experience? Not everyone I disagree with on some points, is someone I'm willing to designate as a "creep".
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-22-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
11. Because I don't compromise on Constitutional issues. |
|
Edited on Sat Nov-22-08 08:48 AM by mmonk
I like Samantha's views concerning global concerns though (have two books of hers). But I have no patience with those that compromise the concepts of government by the people guaranteed by inalienable rights.
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-22-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. and I have my doubts about people who think that they and only |
|
they have the right interpretation of all things in the Constitution.
Closed minds, narrow minds, trouble me. I'm NOT suggesting that all constitutional interpretations are equally valid, just that there are valid disagreements on interpreting the Constitution.
The 2nd Amendment is a great example. The first Amendment is also not completely cut and dry. Same with the 14th.
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-22-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. I don't believe I made such a claim. |
|
However, it's hard to see the 4th amendment to the Constitution in any other way than it is stated.
|
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-22-08 08:25 AM
Response to Original message |
3. I guess she isn't going to be on the Obama team... |
|
if Hillary is SOS.
That is too bad.
|
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-22-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. why does everyone think Clinton can't get over that? |
|
If she can forgive John McCain, I'm sure she can forgive Powers.
|
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-22-08 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. Would Powers want to work with her? |
|
That sounds like an instantly horrendous situation.
|
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-22-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. why not? they are both professional adults |
|
the comments were made in the heat of the primary. lots of bad words went around. neither seem like petty people.
|
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-22-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. When someone calls another person a monster, that shows |
|
they have a very very heartfelt repugnance towards that person. Having to suck that in every day is very unpleasant.
Ask me if I'd like to work with Hillary...
|
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-22-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
16. powers ripped bill on his handling of the genocide in rwanda |
|
so i doubt either one of them would want to be in the same room....
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-22-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
15. I, for one, think HRC is bigger than holding some sort of grudge |
|
from the heat of a campaign.
|
JackRiddler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-22-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message |
14. "Liberal" paternalist imperialists hook up. What a shock. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:09 AM
Response to Original message |