Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DA speaks with reporters about Cheney indictments

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 03:37 PM
Original message
DA speaks with reporters about Cheney indictments
Edited on Sat Nov-22-08 03:39 PM by G_j
DA speaks with reporters about Cheney indictments - unedited


RAW VIDEO: Willacy County DA speaks with reporters:

http://www.kgbt4.com/news/video.aspx?id=225820


`````````````

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=4512242&mesg_id=4512242


Texas hearing on Dick Cheney, Alberto Gonzales indictment turns chaotic

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27843395 /


Criminal Prosecution
By Associated Press

RAYMONDVILLE, Texas — A county prosecutor who brought indictments against Vice President Dick Cheney, former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and others pounded his fist and shouted at the judge Friday about special treatment for high-profile defendants as a routine motions hearing descended into chaos.

Willacy County District Attorney Juan Angel Guerra, who is accusing the public officials of culpability in the alleged abuse of prisoners in a federal detention center, asked Presiding Judge Manuel Banales to recuse himself. Guerra has complained about Banales' handling of the case.

Attorneys for the vice president and other defendants leapt to their feet in objection, as Guerra pounded the table and accused Banales of giving the defendants special treatment in allowing motions to quash the indictments to be heard before the defendants were arraigned.

"Now all of a sudden there is urgency," Guerra shouted. "Eighteen months you kept me indicted through the election." The charges against Guerra were dropped last year. Guerra lost re-election in the March Democratic primary.

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. CHEENEE and Gonzo are right at the top of my list of to-do indictees (& convictees), but, sorry,
this D.A. is a nutcase who is making it harder to get the real job of bringing these thugs to justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Whether or not his charges have enough merit to prevail,
he is not "making it harder" to bring Cheney and Gonzales to justice. Instead, he is breaking the ice regarding hauling their butts into court. And I find it hard to believe that the attorneys for Cheney and Gonzales didn't find a way to hand pick a judge who bore a grudge against the DA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. This D.A. has been having at it with this judge & his (the D.A.'s) whole local judicial
Edited on Sat Nov-22-08 04:50 PM by UTUSN
establishment for a couple or more years now. Since this judge has now asked the (Rethug) state supreme court to instruct him on whether to recuse himself or what else to do, Rethug influence on who gets picked might (now) be a factor. CHEENEE and Gonzo did *not* "hand pick a judge" ---(I repeat: ) FOR NOW. As for who's got the grudge, this D.A. has an equal or more claim.

Let's see whether I can scare up some links regarding this dude's antics, which include handcuffing himself to a table outside the courthouse and daring law enforcement to arrest him, and something about roosters and other "farm animals" (nope, *I* can't explain it).


On Edit: Oh, why, *here's* a thread, right close at hand on DU at LBN: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3612990
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Can't see why you cited that thread
Edited on Sat Nov-22-08 04:55 PM by clear eye
It is the same selection from the same AP story as above, and most respondents said they thought the DA was getting a raw deal, no matter what his personal failings are.

We can agree that this is going nowhere, but I think that the footage of Cheney and Gonzales smirking and chuckling at the defendents' table damages them, and makes it easier to envision them brought up on higher charges. A very small win.

edited to put in a skipped word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I cited the thread because some of the posters were saying the same thing I was, about
Edited on Sat Nov-22-08 05:05 PM by UTUSN
this not passing the smell test. And also because I decided not to spend the time Googling to post the D.A.'s history, which has been posted here before.

What footage? They aren't there and probably won't be. Otoh, there already *is* footage of the D.A. weeping, screaming, pounding the table, and generally being wild-eyed.

Believe me, I ---------- *WANT* ----------these thugs indicted (and convicted), and Shrub, and a long list. What you and I really agree on is our wishful thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Perhaps you haven't heard, "wild-eyed" is a badge of honour on here.
If you were a Prosecutor who had "the goods" on Cheney and the like, as well as a big corporation, and in such an outrageous matter of human-rights abuse, would you go for them with a legal meat-axe? If not, I would suggest that your superior tone on here is little less than an outrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You rely totally on assumptions and personal attacks. What makes you assume
Edited on Sat Nov-22-08 09:16 PM by UTUSN
that this eccentric (to be mild) would be able to pin CHEENEE and the rest when a credible prosecutor, Ronnie EARLE of the State capital, could barely get partial indictments on scumbag Tom DELAY, this would be in Texas, where the State upper courts are wholly Rethug old boys.

While CHEENEE has tons to be indicted about, you've heard of the "ham sandwich" type of indictments?


Your posts in the other thread, where Gman put a lot of work into putting together background on this D.A. and the local politics, http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4517455 you also dismissed it all as "somebody" trying to discredit the dude.

Quit with the personal attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Listen. It's YOU who are making the personal attacks. I quote you, I make
Edited on Sun Nov-23-08 03:45 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
explicit the clear meaning, and you call it a slur.

Did you or did you not claim you were VERY enthusiastic to have Cheney brought to book, but much as you'd LOVE to do so, unfortunately, the Prosecutor, Guerra is wild-eyed and mad. Hell, he even thumped the table with his fist! Who appointed you as Devil's Advocate? Aren't there enough far-right wing threads for you to perform that role on? AND it was the Grand Jury that indicted them! So you are protesting that his mercurial temperament makes him unsuitable to take the matter further?

Well, Sean Connery did that at an interview with Broccoli and the studio big-wigs. He'd been a bit-part actor until, and been warned to be pretty supine before those big-wigs, and it could be his making. Well, guess what, to their astonishment he did the opposite and they couldn't believe their eyes and ears. And he made their fortune!

Just an idle anecdote but it keeps my rage at you in check. It really is very difficult to retain any respect for people whose posts are publicly analyzed by another poster - not that they're exactly byzantine! - and then they accuse the poster of of insulting them! For expressing what they themselves had said in different words, but this time in words that exposed their folly in all its extravagance.

If you can't take the heat, don't say one thing emphatically, and then immediately say... "but, but, but... he's wild-eyed and pounds the table.... and everyone knows he's a loony! Pardon me, but that is precisely the tack Guerra's opponents in this would take, short of imprisoning him or killing him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. it was the Grand Jury that indicte d them
not all of them are looney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. an excellent point lovuian. nt
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC