Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Secretary of State sets neither policy nor tone.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:30 PM
Original message
The Secretary of State sets neither policy nor tone.
The Secretary of State does what the President says to do or the Secretary of State will be named the Former Secretary of State.

Why is this not clear?







(For the literal minded - yes, the President may delegate a lot to any cabinet member and that may **seem** like the cabinet member setting tone or policy. It is not. The President stops the buck - **every** buck.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm of the understanding that the SoS determines what and who the prez sees.
If that is the case, even in part, he has enormous power over the presidency.

Doesn't matter how it SHOULD be or SEEMS to be. Controlling the world's input to the president can vastly influence his views on anything and everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. "... determines who and what the prez sees..." ?
Actually, that's the role of the White House Chief of Staff, newly-named Rahm Emanuel.

The Secreatry of State works for the President, serves at the President's pleasure, and does what the President orders him or her to do.

The Chief of Staff controls access to the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. And even as powerful as that post seems to be, if he fails to serve well the president .......
...... he will quickly become the FORMER CoS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. That's what
"serving at the pleasure of the President" means, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. You're right, I'm sorry.
Got my titles mixed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. No, that's the Chief of Staff.
The Secretary of State generally performs diplomatic and foreign policy functions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Oh you're right. My mistake.
I thought the post was about COS and not SOS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. To agree with what you say implies that, apart from what the SoS tells him, the Pres is clueless.
I don't think that's true.

If the SoS is seen to be stove piping, stonewalling, obstructing, or freelancing, the SoS will be **very** quickly named the FORMER SoS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Alright. I meant CoS so I have to backpedal now.
I can see how the president has much power over the SoS.

The only real protection the SoS would have would be that he or she might be able to make it look bad if the prez threw him or her out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Poor DireStrike
One slip-up and you're rapidly educated by the incredibly quick DUers.

Of course you knew. To mix up the SOS and COS isn't all that hard, especially if you've not spent your life watching Washington politics.

Bet you'll never make THAT mistake again, huh?

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Haha!
That's for sure. I've been reading AND typing too quickly lately.

Deep breaths and less caffeine are in order! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. That's not even remotely true
There are other people who also provide input to the President on Foreign Policy. Obama has a VP who has 30 years of foreign policy experience - and he is not walled off from foreign policy or foreign leaders. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee and its House counterpart have oversight responsibilities. There is also who ever has NSA. Not to mention the President may have direct contacts himself with other leaders - many of whom he met while in the Senate. (Biden, Kerry (chair of SFRC) and the NSA person will not be filtered through the SoS.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. That could have been said about VP - before Cheney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. "Cheney" will never happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. He won't have to
It's over
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. Henry Kissinger was pretty damn ambitious
All those fuck ups were Nixon?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Thank you
I am still furious that that war criminal is allowed to walk free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. He is what he is because Nixon didn't stop him
Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. All those fuckups were Nixon and they were Nixon *choosing* to let Henry continue in office.
Nixon (as does every president) had the power to make it stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. They might not have been Nixon-originated, but
I am positive that they were at least Nixon-approved.

No President comes up with ALL of his or her ideas; that's what advisors are for. The Sec of State can think up ideas, but he or she CANNOT implement them without Presidential approval.

So yes, indirectly, all of Kissinger's fuck-ups were Nixon's too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
21. It Has to Be...otherwise its a Cabinet of Nilly Willy Ideas/directions
The CEO sets the tone with advice from his cabinet,,,he is not bount to use said advice...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC