Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sewage Saturates Sadr City as Billions in Investment Fail to Rebuild Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 05:49 PM
Original message
Sewage Saturates Sadr City as Billions in Investment Fail to Rebuild Iraq
Sewage Saturates Sadr City as Billions Fail to Reconstruct Iraq

By Daniel Williams


Nov. 25 (Bloomberg) -- Spare tires come in handy in Sadr City when lakes of sewage overflow trenches or bubble up from broken underground pipes. Pedestrians pull them from at-ready stacks to create a foot bridge across the excrement.

It’s a routine honed by years of neglect, indifference and, recently, good intentions sucked into a cycle of despair. Almost six years after the fall of Saddam Hussein, sewers in the sprawling Baghdad slum have become the most odorous example of how things don’t get done in Iraq.

While the U.S. has been able to pacify once-roiled areas, electricity is still spotty, drinking water is scarce and health care is limited -- even though America has spent billions of dollars on reconstruction and the Iraqi government has taken in hundreds of millions of dollars in oil revenue.

“Getting rid of this -- how can I put it delicately -- this waste material has become a dream,” says Kamal Hanjab, 44, the district council chairman. “I fear that when I die, I will be buried in it.”

Raw sewage has become something of an emblem for Sadr City, home to 2 million of Baghdad’s 5 million inhabitants. It has swamped streets since at least the early 1990s, flowing freely even as Saddam built himself eight Taj Mahal-scale palace compounds.

The sludge seeped on after the U.S.-led invasion in 2003, when American warriors-turned-plumbers tried repeatedly to unclog the works. In 2004, troops pulled a dead horse from one sewer, according to a report on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Web site. .......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=ad8JHnJwlcUE&refer=home




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. "But on the bright side, war profits are WAY UP for republicon cronies." - Commander AWOL
Edited on Tue Nov-25-08 06:00 PM by SpiralHawk
"That's right, even though Iraq had NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11, and we have killed over a million innocent civilians, and messed up the infrastructure beyond conception while squandering and stealing the support money, there is a silver lining: MASSIVE MEGABUCKS PROFITS for Republicon Cronies & Contractors.

"You can bet your boootay that we republicons are SMIRKING all the way to the bank, as we leave the carcasses, the rubble, the steenkin sewage, and the chaos in the lap of the sucker DummyKrats. Smirk."

- Commander AWOL & VP Dickie 'Five Military Deferments' Cheney (R)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. A before and after 2003 in Baghdad photo album
we have totally fucked up yet another country in the name of 'democracy'. What a tragic joke.

http://www.slideshare.net/weblover/iraq-before-and-after-war/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trollybob Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. The only solution giving anyone a smidgen of satisfaction
is to prosecute the person responsible for all of this. Who else but a U.S. President is allowed by the international community to invade another country without legal justification and overthrow its government? And what about the murder of Sadaam Hussein's two sons that everyone in the U.S. seemed to think was ok since we demonized them first? I can see why Bush wouldn't want to join the International Court at The Hague, since he'd be the next one in line after Charles Taylor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC