Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

San Francisco weighing rush-hour congestion fee for motorists.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 11:25 AM
Original message
San Francisco weighing rush-hour congestion fee for motorists.....
from the SF Chronicle:



S.F. considers congestion tolls on cars
Michael Cabanatuan, Chronicle Staff Writer

Wednesday, November 26, 2008


Drivers could pay $3 to enter, leave or pass through parts of San Francisco during morning and evening commutes under a proposal designed to push motorists out of their cars.

The San Francisco County Transportation Authority, which has been studying the idea of imposing congestion-based tolls on city streets for nearly two years, released some of the details of its study Tuesday at a meeting of its board, which is made up of the 11 members of the Board of Supervisors.

The board won't consider recommending a congestion toll plan until February, but members nodded their heads during the report, and at least three, Jake McGoldrick, Tom Ammiano and Ross Mirkarimi, offered words of support.

"Clearly, I like where this is going," said Mirkarimi.

The congestion toll, if implemented, would be the first in the nation. Similar tolls, also known as cordon tolls, have been used in London and Stockholm, where they're credited with reducing traffic congestion, air pollution and miles driven. They also have raised tens of millions annually for public transportation improvements.

While many of the details are still being studied, Zabe Bent, principal planner for the authority, said a $3 toll was chosen because it would probably influence how many people choose to drive versus walking, biking or taking transit. .......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/11/25/MNS614C8S1.DTL&tsp=1




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. More Taxation whether you like it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, but congestion also has a real cost
Edited on Wed Nov-26-08 11:38 AM by wuushew
Why oppose something that leads to a better operating traffic system?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Smart taxation.....I've visited London pre- and post-congestion tax....
And Central London is a much better place to be post-congestion tax. It's speeded up traffic and gotten rid of some of that acrid vehicle exhaust. And it's made taking the bus a viable transportation option, as the buses aren't stuck in traffic going nowhere anymore. And Central London is as lively as it's ever been.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. Just the further regimentation of life
And I haven't owned a car, don't own a car, and have no plans of owning a car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Here's why this is fucked up
1) You can't get in or out of San Francisco without paying a goddamn toll at a bridge anyway.

2) The city has a fucking major US highway (101) going right through the middle of it. It's probably the only major US city left that you can't get around by some sort of bypass. And not really any way to build one either.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. If it is true that time is money then they are already paying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC