Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone catch Charlie Rose's interview last night with the CEO of Citigroup ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:56 PM
Original message
Anyone catch Charlie Rose's interview last night with the CEO of Citigroup ?
If you missed Charlie Rose's interview last night with the current CEO of Citigroup, at the end he
asked the CEO if they (the large financial firms) felt a responsibility to publicly explain themselves, or felt remorse or any sense of accountability for the horrific effect their lack of regulation, poor judgement (and greed) has had on such an enormous number of lives. The CEO changed the subject and Charlie asked him again. He could not/would not answer.

View it here > http://www.charlierose.com/view/interview/9653


Also, tonight he interviews Chris Dodd.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. I recorded it to watch later today
Sounds like the gag factor is large.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well I can guarantee you that you'll become sick of the words "restore confidence"
by the time it's over. That seems to be his explanation of both the problem and the solution.
And he keeps pointing to the housing bubble as if that was some anomoly that just appeared out of the blue for no apparent reason rather than as a result of their actions, or deregulation, lack of oversight, revision of lending laws, etc.

In other words, they too were victims of this 'thing' that happened. Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. More of that "mysterious hand of the Market" again huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yeah, like some child's fanciful explanation of why the cookie jar is empty
while standing there covered with cookie crumbs. :shrug:

:eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fumsm Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Pathetic
Why do these guys let them get away with it? He had nice hair, only been there for a year so it's not his fault. When are we going to see some jail time for these bastards? WTF is it going to take? There was a good show on PBS the other night with inside dudes who actually participated in the crimes. They know who was leading the charge. Why isn't something being done to these mangers who pushed for the fake CDO's and pressure to gain triple a ratings. And why the fuck isn't the MSM interviewing these guys. Ohh, their too busy bringing up some stupid rev right shit again (shuster at 12:55 on msnbc). And here we go again, the mistress of the biggest enabler, the queen talking saggy tits herself, Andrea Greenspan taking abut economic issues like she has a clue. Sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah that was an excellent program about the credit ratings and
how the alarmists were stifled within these firms. Play along or leave the firm.
They were basically making it up as they went along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. In what respect, Charlie? Asked by a more intelligent, devious person.
He did not take responsibility, or want to take the consequences. Asset quality? Did they ever question this when they were making money over fist? Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. I use Charlie as an insomnia treatment
never fails, and no lasting "hangover" effect like from sleeping pills...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. He was head of a small hedge fund that Citigroup bought last year
A hedge fund with a $4.5 billion portfolio. Within a year the fund lost $3 billion and all of its clients, save holdings by Citigroup and its employees. So, they wrote off the $800 million purchase price...

...and promoted the guy to CEO of Citigroup.

Figure that one out. I sure can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Something out of Alice in Wonderland.
Why is anyone rewarded for running the ship aground?

I have similar questions about those currently being chosen to head up our economic policies in Obama's administration. Some of the same people who enabled this crisis are now rewarded with positions.
It all seems absurd perhaps because our perspective is so at odds with theirs. We aren't looking through the same lens. Or perhaps we can't handle the truth and dismiss our own inner alarms.

At any rate, it seems we are left asking this question a lot these days:
Was it intentional or a case of incompetence?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Uuurgh
I don't like even thinking about some of the retreads being floated for positions in the new gov't. I'm not much interested in trading snarks with the unquestioning faithful who'll swarm if I open my mouth about it, so I sit, watch, wait, and stew.

One of the first things that happened on Bush's watch was the rolling blackouts and energy price gouging in California, deliberately engineered for fun and profit, a spectacularly audacious crime. So how much of this current mess was intentional? I doubt we'll ever know, but I think it'd be damned foolish not to assume a lot of it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. More proof...
The the #1 qualification to be a CEO of a large corporation is to be a diagnosable sociopath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exboyfil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I was angry when the BoA CEO dumped on the Big 3 CEOs
All financial firms actually have to do is manage risk. All of our big firms did a terrible job in this regard. This is all they have to do.

The CEOs of the Big 3 auto companies have to deal not only with financial risk, but so many other factors (historical union contracts, overseas competition, transplant competition, commodity prices, environmental regulations, OSHA regulations, suppliers, and actually making something other than bits of paper).

We have this situation entirely flipped on its head. If we had been granting such largesse in the form of protectionism to our manufacturers, then at least folks would be working (of course prices and quality would be less).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. we are bailing their
a$$es out. SOB's all of them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC