Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Norm Coleman Seeks To Stop Minnesota Recount

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 06:15 PM
Original message
Norm Coleman Seeks To Stop Minnesota Recount
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/12/norm-coleman-seeks-to-sto_n_150687.html


Norm Coleman Seeks To Stop Minnesota Recount

The Huffington Post | December 12, 2008 05:37 PM


Al Franken won a major procedural victory in the Minnesota Senate recount Friday, when the state canvassing board declared that rejected absentee ballots should be counted. Now Republican Sen. Norm Coleman is going to court to stop that count:

The campaign of Sen. Norm Coleman is taking its case to the state Supreme Court, asking the justices to order counties to follow a standard procedure in identifying wrongfully rejected absentee ballots. It is asking county officials to halt any counting of rejected absentee ballots from the U.S. Senate election until the justices can rule on the campaign's request.

The campaign said that it feared what it called a chaotic "Florida situation" and that it is likely to go to the court today.

The announcement came just hours after the state Canvassing Board, which is overseeing the recount in contest between Coleman and Democrat Al Franken, voted unanimously to ask election officials in all 87 counties to identify and count improperly rejected ballots. Board members stressed that they only have the authority to make a recommendation and not to issue an order.

...

"It looks like a significant number," said state Secretary of State Mark Ritchie, the Canvassing Board's chairman.

Speaking to reporters after the board adjourned today, Ritchie said that most of the county officials he's talked to "are very anxious to correct their errors."

Franken campaign officials said there already are standards set forth in Minnesota election law and that the rejected ballots that do not meet those four standards should be counted.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. They fear the Florida situation? That exactly what they want, assholes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. ...again.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. If only the US Atty in Minnesota would finger Coleman
It would add a little more drama to this saga.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Monday would be a nice time to leak some VERY bad news for Coleman...
You know.. the investigation...

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Shouldn't Norm follow his own advice and just concede?
For the good of the state, naturally.

Odd that Norm doesn't want to count all the ballots. Surely he doesn't concede the possibility that he may not win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Of course he is. The GOP tradition is to not count all votes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laf.La.Dem. Donating Member (924 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. count improperly rejected ballots
What the HELL is wrong with "count improperly rejected ballots":shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC