Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Al Jazeera Breaks the Israeli Media Blockade

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 03:54 PM
Original message
Al Jazeera Breaks the Israeli Media Blockade
Source: New America Media



New America Media, News Report, Shane Bauer, Posted: Jan 06, 2009 Review it on NewsTrust

DAMASCUS, Syria -- Throughout the 11 days of Israel's pummeling of Gaza, live coverage of the war hasn't made it into most American living rooms.

That's because Israel, America's staunch ally, isn't allowing journalists to enter Gaza while Al Jazeera, called anti-American and pro-terrorist by many in Washington, is the only network broadcasting live images from Gaza to the world.

The 350 reporters who descended on Israel when the conflict began are stuck at the border between Israel and Gaza. Israel says that opening border crossings to journalists would put their soldiers in danger, but many have accused them of trying to control the story. Instead of giving their viewers up-close pictorial evidence of what is occurring in Gaza, television networks have been restricted to showing their viewers plumes of smoke as they rise in the distance.

But Al Jazeera, the Qatari network that has previously undergone attacks and had its reporters arrested by the U.S. military, remains typically defiant. While other networks are increasingly severed from Gaza as phone lines are cut and 75 percent of the territory is without electricity, Al Jazeera is bringing its approximately 140 million English- and Arabic-speaking viewers live images of bombings, tanks rolling through Gaza's farmland, and interviews with civilians and aid workers inside Gaza city.



Read more: http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=db5f72890b1f8e4fad37c77329277907
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. It shouldn't surprise anyone that the US media is censored to the truth
The government won't have a repeat of Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The society of spectacle
Only what happens on the telly (the circus games) is real. "We the people" reduced from citizens to spectators.

Stop watching, go to the streets - that was the banner of the Greek protesters who took over a national channel for a moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The corporatists have taken this planet over and it must be stopped.
"People shouldn't be afraid of their government. Governments should be afraid of their people."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davekriss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Do you mean to say...
The fetishism of the commodity — the domination of society by "intangible as well as tangible things" — attains its ultimate fulfillment in the spectacle, where the real world is replaced by a selection of images which are projected above it, yet which at the same time succeed in making themselves regarded as the epitome of reality.
-- Guy Debord, Society of the Spectacle

Yes that does seem to be highly operative in our culture. Also, it was the intention of early "public relations", as birthed by Bernays, to render the vast majority of citizens as "spectators", blissful on the sidelines while the important people made the geo-political decisions for us (to their own advantage, of course).

I also recall the byline of a list server I used to use a while ago: "Get off the internet; I'll see you in the streets!" (appeared at the bottom of every displyed page).



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ours in the UK seems to be pretty much uncensored.
I was amazed that we saw, given an early warning , the pictures of the dead children lined up on the mortuary floor on ITN New At Ten last night.

Very very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Israel says that opening border crossings to journalists would put their soldiers in danger"
Uh...would those be the same soldiers who are fully armed and using white phosphorus and cluster bombs?

What sort of threat could they present? Israel has already shown willingness to attack doctors and UN people. Unless, of course, their official line couldn't support what would be reported?

Nah, it couldn't be that! Israel NEVER lies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I dont understand why they claim their soldiers are the reason
When they have barred journalists from Gaza for months before this. The Israeli Supreme Court even had to rule on it, saying it was a violation and that Israel must allow them in. Israel then said they would allow I believe a pool of 12 in, but has yet to do so, and now they have a fresh excuse of "the soliders."

My question: Why were they not allowed in before this happened? Why did their courts have to even rule on it? What are they hiding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Frankly, they are hiding slow genocide
I don't know why they bother, though- no one is in a position to stop them as long as the US backs them up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. Al Jazeera -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadesOfGrey Donating Member (646 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That was an excellent article. Thanks for the link.

I'm bookmarking that site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. AL Jazeera has more credibility than all of M$Greedia
Isn't that amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. CNN earned its reputation when it reported live from Baghdad during the First Persian Gulf War.
The people in the Pentagon were pissed off to no end that somebody was reporting outside their controlled media pools. They gained a lot of street credibility in those days, only to lose it 12 years later when they simply parroted Pentagon talking points and simply embedded their journalists with American units instead of doing it the gum-shoe way, the old-fashioned way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. And the least US media outlets like CNN could do right now in face of the embargo
is to at least have their anchors announce on air that the Israeli government is barring them from Gaza and that is why they are only showing plumes of smoke in the distance.

But you never hear a word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC