Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Its a catastrophe for the apostrophe in Britain

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 10:36 PM
Original message
Its a catastrophe for the apostrophe in Britain
AP via Yahoo!:



Its a catastrophe for the apostrophe in Britain
By MEERA SELVA, Associated Press Writer


LONDON – On the streets of Birmingham, the queen's English is now the queens English.

England's second-largest city has decided to drop apostrophes from all its street signs, saying they're confusing and old-fashioned.

But some purists are downright possessive about the punctuation mark.

It seems that Birmingham officials have been taking a hammer to grammar for years, quietly dropping apostrophes from street signs since the 1950s. Through the decades, residents have frequently launched spirited campaigns to restore the missing punctuation to signs denoting such places as "St. Pauls Square" or "Acocks Green."

This week, the council made it official, saying it was banning the punctuation mark from signs in a bid to end the dispute once and for all.

Councilor Martin Mullaney, who heads the city's transport scrutiny committee, said he decided to act after yet another interminable debate into whether "Kings Heath," a Birmingham suburb, should be rewritten with an apostrophe.

"I had to make a final decision on this," he said Friday. "We keep debating apostrophes in meetings and we have other things to do." .......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090131/ap_on_re_eu/eu_britain_no_apostrophe




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's just bizarre. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. you mean: Thats just bizarre.
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yeah. Thats what I meant. LOL! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. disgusting -- this queen want to see signs in the fuckin queen's english. nt
Edited on Sat Jan-31-09 10:40 PM by xchrom
i'm so mad about this -- i mispelled..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. This wont please the apostrophe police around here.
This isnt a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Considering that we mix them up here
it's just a matter of time.

Things that should have an apostrophe don't

Things that don't have an apostrophe do.

:eyes:

It's enough to drive an English Major around the bend. :crazy: x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. But I find much amusement in it.
It's true, I do!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
25. I know...it's a big source of amusement for me, personally...
To see signs advertising stuff like "Fish and chip's"

"Ham and egg's"



Even funnier are the misplaced quotation marks...


"Cash" only please

"Chicken" breasts - 2 lbs/$5.00


:7


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. It certainly will screw up the UK's elementary
school children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Hah. Wouldn't that be UKs elementary school children?
LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Darn, I meant to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Holy apostrophe apostasy, Batman!
This is stupid. Just another example of dumbing down the language. Isn't Britain's major industry tourism? People go to see old England the the Queen's English. Save the apostrophe!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. So, stop using apostrophe's because some people cant'
figure out how to us'e them? Brilliant!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. This appears to be the possessive use
of the apostrophe on signage. As a graphic designer who has had to deal with this sort of thing, I can't say I disagree with dropping the apostrophe for signage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VPStoltz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. How does that have anything to do with "signage?"
Either it's spelled correctly or it isn't.
And here I thought it was only Americans who couldn't figure its proper usage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. It's hell to design signage with apostrophes
And I do believe that is what this is all about.

Perhaps I'm not understanding the situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Maybe for plural possessive - i.e., the workers movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
20score Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. Its terrible it is. Ive been saying this for month's. Now, as to Britains punctuation mark's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
17. As opposed to the apostrophe proliferation we have in the US, where...
it now means, "here comes an s!"

Ive been objecting for year's!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. LOL!
I love it -- "here comes an s!" So true.

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. stole it, of course.
But isn't that true of most everything, from one-liners to Shakspere himself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
20. You gotta laugh at those defending "the Queen's English." During THE most vibrant
period in the development of the English language--the rule of Queen Elizabeth I--there were NO rules for the written word--no dictionaries, no grammaries, no punctuation police, nada (William Shakespeare spelled his own name six different ways)--and the ruling rule for the spoken word was: "BE INVENTIVE."

It is only later that English became schoolmarmish and, well, precise (--although you gotta hand it to Mr. Shakspar for being as precise as he was with a wildly inventive language).

Anyhoo, the problem with "Queens Road" is that it creates ambiguity about the number of Queens of England at any one time. It also creates a bit of ambiguity about what kind of "queens" you mean, exactly. Is the road down the way a gay enclave? Or is it a road honoring the ruling monarch?

That is my objection to this new sloppiness about the apostrophe in England. But, hey, they invented this mindbogglingly inconsistent, irrational, difficult to larn, at times beautiful beyond words, at times uglier than Bushites, form of thought, and spread it all over the goddamned world, so I guess we who claim to speak it with no allegiance to the Queen owe them the benefit of the doubt, if they want to throw out one of late-appearing rules.

It may be the end of western civilization, though, if you combine it with a few other things that are happening. Could explain the mindfuck involved in the misuse of the word "bailout" and the phrase "war on terror." It might all be traceable back to the English mixing up of "Queen's" and "queens." If they can't keep their apostrophes together, how can the plebes, peons, wage slaves and cannon fodder of the English-speaking world be expected to keep it all going?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
21. Apoplexapostrophe
Doodah doodah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
22. It is kinda dumb. The apostrophe represents a dropped letter in the Dutch word, "se"
It is very archaic. A long time ago, I used to read a dialect of Dutch spoken in South Africa called Afrikaans.

English developed from a number of languages in including a dialect that became both early English and Dutch.

IIRC, to make a possessive, you add the word "se". So the "Queen's English" originally was written "Queen se English."

Like apostrophes in words like "can't", the apostrophe in possessives shows that two words have been combined and a letter has been dropped.

In the same way that "do not" is written "don't",
"Queen se English" came to be said more quickly as "Queen's English" and the apostrophe showed the words were combined and the letter e dropped.

To still use it today seems silly since no one really knows or remembers the word "se" anymore anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. ... except it's not silly because it is the only way to ...
... differentiate a plural from a possessive. Apostrophes actually make the meaning clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
23. First they came for the commas . . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC