Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

All over the world, economic protests against globalism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 06:18 AM
Original message
All over the world, economic protests against globalism
Edited on Mon Feb-02-09 06:22 AM by Waiting For Everyman
People everywhere are done with it. They realize it does nothing for anyone except the corporatists.

This is by no means a comprehensive list, just the most recent protests, from a quick search. I know there are more, but you get the picture...

Russia 1/31
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFZgUp-VXBM

France 1/30
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLTOrgHvO7Q

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yi3Q5e7-eh8

Latvia 2/1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKeWBO3_uCc

Lithuania 1/16
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWMxj03mOV4

Iceland 1/26
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MK0d0Nno4zw

Bulgaria 1/14
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMR1zu2G5hw

Colombia
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxfKNIHa48M

Mexico 1/31
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRbaq5PcJ48

Switzerland 1/31
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZHHXPRrAAo

China 1/2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEfrjNrs3oc

Greece, of course - as we already know

UK 1/31
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EabWX3_mdA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaD7GlBegG0


It isn't working anywhere. And everybody knows it. In fact it's making people poorer everywhere, they know that too. Everybody is fed up with their jobs being taken by cheap labor, or their wages reduced, which is happening all over. So there is no reason to think that we have to go along with this. It isn't some inevitable wave that everybody else is for. Quite the contrary. It's inevitable that it will end soon. The corporatists can't keep it going by force everywhere in the world, with everywhere rising up against it. It's over. The world is looking for economic nationalism, and "the people" are right on this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. I know I am fucking sick of it
I see who is losing their jobs and have to work with the peopl who are taking them - there is simply no comparision, they're cheap and they SUCK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. ...and World Economic Forum attendees head back to their comfortable positions
...convinced that globalization and the New World Order only needs fine tuning but is working just fine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Gordon Brown, for one, may be out of a job himself soon.
Britain's protest looks like it may be turning into a movement rapidly. It almost reminds me of the Obama campaign in a way - but I don't know if it has a leader as good as him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. The world got conned ...again.
The fascists did it in the 1920s and then again when Raygun got voted into office. Bush was just the culmination of 30 years of deregulation and neoliberal or "free" market economic fantasy.

The lie is that if you let businessmen, financiers, venture capitalists and bankers alone, take all the rules off of them, they will NOT lie, cheat and steal from the middle class. Somehow these uber wealthy folks are so much more saintly than the rest of society. It's the same as deregulating criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. You ain't see 'nuthin' yet
It will get worse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillbillyBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I suspect and have had the feeling since partner got
Edited on Mon Feb-02-09 07:49 AM by HillbillyBob
outsourced in 2001 2x and he had to train replacement at the first place he was let go from.
In reference to "The fascists did it in the 1920s and then again when Raygun got voted into office. Bush was just the culmination of 30 years of deregulation and neoliberal or "free" market economic fantasy?.
The Rs are fascists, they have been since Herbert Hoover (at least a good size portion of the corporate supporters have) and more have become so since.
We must be always aware of this and guard against it.
I have heard this from various sources from Holocaust survivors to former federal employees. For years I thought it was just talk, exaggerations, or maybe feverish imaginings. Now I am pretty sure, no very sure it is true from reading rare writings to bits I have found in the Library of Congress, which after amBushco have all disappeared or no longer available on line or 'classified in the name of national security. Which I find seriously suspicious, if there was nothing to it, why delete or hide references to any number of well known corporatists being Nazi supporters? Henry Ford, Prescott Bush, Andrew Mellon (alcoa. later Mellon bank),Averill Harriman, Father Conghlin friend and likely mentor ot Billy Graham.
It is early and I have not had enough coffee to be fully awake yet.
The corporate agenda has a lot to do with the anti communist anti labor and making labor unions appear to be communists. Look into the Red Scare of 1919 for instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Oh, you're definitely right. I have some sources I could give you
Edited on Mon Feb-02-09 08:54 AM by Waiting For Everyman
which haven't disappeared. Plus I remember for myself, watching the McCarthy hearings when I was just a kid on our first TV (black and white). Looking back, I'm surprised it was televised, except I guess that the "powers that be" didn't know any better. Everything about TV was an experiment then.

You might look up Anton Chaitkin and Webster Tarpley's biography of the Bush family, for a lot of information such as you referred to. It's readable online. Also Treason In America: From Aaron Burr to Averell Harriman by Chaitkin (it won't be in stores, it's a 1980's book but Amazon has it) for the early, early, roots of it. It's one continuous thread going back that far (actually much farther).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't think it has much to do with what people want
If the energy required to do it is cheap enough, it will continue. If it isn't, then it won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. That's a gross oversimplification.
The protests in Iceland, for one, were against the current government's heinous mismanagement of the crisis there, not globalization. And in Iceland, as in the US, the problems were primarily due to poor regulation of financial markets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Well that's rather weird.
I see, then foreign investments had nothing to do with it. Iceland is the only economy on earth which isn't entangled with the others, and therefore, its downfall was all an internal matter. Ok then.

I suppose I could've written a paragraph for the subject line, instead of summarizing the thought as succinctly as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. It wasn't "foreign investments."
It was foreign investments backed almost solely by debt as a specific result of poor regulation of Icelandic banks by the government of that country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
10. So did the New World Order...
...last longer than the Thousand Year Reich? Or the Permanent Republican Majority?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. That's great...as far as it goes.
But protesting against an ideology is about as effective as fighting a war on a strategy.

Perhaps it's time we start putting faces and names to the perpetrators of predatory and exploitive globalization and start holding them accountable for their actions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. An excellent idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Thank you.
Now to put action to the idea, it's time to start finding names and getting them out there in front of people's faces.

One place to start is in this book review.

Only a couple of names are listed. Perhaps others can help dig up a few more.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pilsner Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
15. Where we were before 9-11
The Seattle protest happened just months before 9-11.

A huge protest was planned in D.C. in October 2001 but got canceled.

8 additional years of corporate hegemony/globalization allowed us to see the outcome of world-wide Friedmanomics---the shit can for 98% of earth's citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. The Seattle protest getting "lost in the shuffle" then was a real tragedy
Edited on Mon Feb-02-09 02:50 PM by Waiting For Everyman
looking back on it. I live on the East Coast and we really didn't get much press about it at the time (at least in my media market). Then as you say, 9/11 broke loose. Dire consequences for the whole world - economically and militarily.

I have no doubt that if the D.C. protest had happened (and 9/11 had not), it would've gained momentum and things would've been very different.

By these demonstrations, it does look like we're back at the same point - only lots of additional damage later. But the actions are so widespread now though, so that's good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
17. Every country has people who don't understand economics.
Every country has a lot of people who want the government to pass laws whose stated intent is to boost that country's economy at the expense of other countries' economies.

It's always tempting to say "save ourselves, and screw Johnny Foreigner". And, if protectionist policies actually helped save ourselves, even though they make things worse for people in other countries, whether or not to do so would be a genuine moral dilemma.

The problem is that governments can't encourage you to buy/employ domestic, they can just discourage you from buying/employing foreign.

And if one country passes such laws, its trade partners do too.

So:

Workers gain by having less competition for jobs from local employers, but lose by finding it harder to get jobs from foreign employers

Employers lose by having a more restricted labour market

Consumers lose by having less access to products for sale

Producers gain by having less competition for the domestic market, but lose by finding it harder to compete in foreign markets.


Invariably, there are many more net losers than net winners.

Protectionism was one of the things that made the last great depression a lot worse than it might have been.

With any luck, international trade is here to stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. And all that is what has obviously failed. You may as well admit it.
Edited on Mon Feb-02-09 02:33 PM by Waiting For Everyman
The U.S. is not like Europe. It doesn't matter a whole lot if our workers can't get jobs in other countries - that isn't big on our concern list. The cheaper products are only cheap in quality because every corner is cut. Meanwhile jobs are outsourced and never come back - only to increase the corporatists' profit margin.

This is all bull, and workers all over the world know it by now. It's rather obvious, with the economy in ruins from it all around us. And if this is "economics" that we "don't understand", then it's voo-doo economics. The kind taught by University of Chicago followers. I think it's pretty clear to most thinking people that Keynes has won the argument over Friedman.

I don't intend to be explaining this to each and every free trader every time I post, so any who are likeminded please take note. After this, I'll probably just say, "whatever".

Btw, we had a pretty good economy here before free trade. And that concept also btw, was rejected here 200 years ago. It was promoted by the opium and tea predators for the same reason - to rape the world. Some things don't change - the globalists' spots, are one of them.

Oh, and... your sig line says it all "mathematician first, human being second". (This is why beancounters shouldn't be making policy.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Unfortunately for the US, it doesn't get to dictate trade terms so unilaterally anymore.
America - and Europe, for that matter - had economies before free trade that functioned because they were able to dictate trade terms with the third world entirely one-sidedly, and exploited it ruthlessly.

Clearly, the ideal situation for any given country is for it to be protectionist and everywhere else to be free trade, and in the past that was sort of possible for the first world.

Now, that exploitation still happens to a considerable extent, but it's no longer nearly as easy, which means that the terms will need to be fairer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Well, tell it to the protesters in the OP.
Edited on Mon Feb-02-09 02:56 PM by Waiting For Everyman
The Third World is being exploited a lot more than before. And so is the First World, and Second World. As I asserted, it's working for no one - except the corporatists.

Well unfortunately for them, they are few and the workers of the world are many. And just as agreements are made, they can be unmade. Looks to me like there's an emerging simultaneous consensus on doing that. But time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. Globalization is a misnomer.

It's Global Capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hologram Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. China?
Protesting globalization in China? :wtf: I thought China was the grand beneficiary of globalization, sucking up jobs and wages from everyplace else. Are they protesting slave labor conditions or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
24. Well no shit. We've been pushing this "We are the world" hand-holding shit for decades...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. The Global Predator Class is doing all the hand-holding
Us peons? Not so much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SergeyDovlatov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
25. Moscow protest video is half fake
Edited on Mon Feb-02-09 04:45 PM by SergeyDovlatov
Some of the pictures are from Ukraine. Some of them from Chechnya.
The current protests were done by nazbols, who deny their neo-nazi connections, but still use symbolics eary similar to nazis.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Bolshevik_Party





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
27. And in the United States?
Nah, we're too busy defending the bastards with posts about how the rich aren't "all bad." :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
28. and where are the protests in America?

Why aren't hundreds of thousands of Americans protesting the bailouts to the corrupted banksters?

Why aren't hundreds of thousands of Americans protesting the prosecution of Bush and his cronies who led us into an unjust war that has killed over 4000 of our men and women?

Why aren't hundreds of thousands of Americans protesting torture?

Maybe there will be hundreds of thousands of Americans protesting when people have lost their jobs and they have no money to by food or have a place to stay to keep warm. Maybe they will protest when they are personally affected.


:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
29. In Years to Come...we will REMEMBER...this was just "THE BEGINNING of CHANGE"
Because it will be..wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC