Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Please tell me why Judd Gregg is being appointed? Is he the best qualified?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:37 AM
Original message
Please tell me why Judd Gregg is being appointed? Is he the best qualified?
Is he a strategic token for the right? Do we pick up his seat and get the mythical "filibuster-proof" senate? Does he have some special talent to build bridges? Was it his stand on ANWR? Will he now be a mole in the conservative caucus of the Repubican party, where he has been a long time card carrying member?

Is Judd Gregg the person singularly most qualified to run the United States Department of Commerce?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Da Juddhead - it's a Granite State of Mind (smirk)
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 10:32 AM by SpiralHawk
The sneering & smirking Granite Brain Republicon has given, by example, new impetus to the Republicon Homelander's perverse proclivity to throw aged widows from their home...

Wait till Juddhead gets ahold of Commerce -- and elevates Republiconomic FAIL to a new level...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. To loosen a GOP chink in the Senate for a future election. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Gregg was sure to lose in 2010.
Now, if a moderate Repub runs... Dems might not take the seat after all. And now lets watch Lynch's numbers fall. Between slashing medicaid and appointing a Repub - I would be shocked if he gets reelected. What a mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hopefully, a reason will be found for Obama to fire him sometime soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Why? Obama has a built-in GOP scapegoat with Gregg.
It's not like the Commerce Secretary is front-and-center in most administrations, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Point taken.
But, goppers have proven to be stubborn asses on their side of 'bi-partisanship'. I think Obama is making moves like these to take it directly to the people. He is slicing more of the republican voters off each time he makes efforts, alienating the neo-confederates in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. You're kidding, right?
Why not just appoint a replacement now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Because Gregg made the deal, and obviously Lynch and Obama have no problem with it.
It helps to pick a Republican who has no experience in elective office. She's a Gregg staffer. which makes him happy, but she might not be a winner in a head-to-head contest with the right Dem going up against her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. Cabinet appointments are 100% politics.
Being the "most qulified" is beside the point -- at least in the traditional pure meritocracy sense. In politics the "most qualified" is not usually the "most qualified."

Judd Gregg is being considered because he serves a political purpose: The appearance of national unity and bipartisanship. If we get another Democratic senator out of the deal, so much the better.

Cabinet appointments only matter for real when you have a chief executive who is, disengaged, intellectually lazy, and utterly lacking in principle. (Read: George W. Bush.) When you have a smart, hands-on chief executive with a clear vision, then the cabinet secretaries don't have room to go rogue. They serve the chief executive, and are committed to pursuing his agenda.

If Barack Obama thinks Judd Gregg would make a good Commerce Secretary -- that's good enough for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. I think there is a small flaw here
"If Barack Obama thinks Judd Gregg would make a good Commerce Secretary -- that's good enough for me."

Here's what I think, if there are outstanding candidates available then we (the people) are being shortchanged by taking someone who is just good enough. Why should we pay for mediocre when we can have the best? Strive for excellence and all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. That sentence was not really central to my point.
My point is that Obama seems to believe Judd Gregg *is* the best choice. But pure merit is not the standard for cabinet secretaries, and never has been for any administration.

The standard for cabinet secretaries is politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Gotcha ....
Well, I hope he's right that as an overall package (competence plus political points) Gregg works out all right. My greatest concern is the upcoming census. Count the poor for a change to start with and then there will be the redistricting to follow. All of this is coordinated through Commerce if I remember correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. No better man could be found on earth. Sound familiar?
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 09:53 AM by ThomWV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. Inside the tent pissing out....
rather than outside pissing in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. So far inside the tent that he's pissing on our heads.
Maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. (1) harmless outreach (2) makes Obama look bipartisan (3) pushes GOP senators further right
It's a very smart move, isolating the Republicans further to the right and making the incumbent party look more reasonable. Commerce is one of those posts where the appointee can do little harm. And before you panic, remember who Judd Gregg's boss will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
17. yet another Obama olive branch to conservatives, now if he would do the same with progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC