Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Maybe the closer one gets to being repubican, the more one has ethical 'issues'?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:59 PM
Original message
"Maybe the closer one gets to being repubican, the more one has ethical 'issues'?"
An unproven theory for which recent empirical evidence would suggest some basis in fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. And one would have to include the Republic owned media in that, right?
This afternoon, MSNC is screaming, WHAT WENT WRONG with the vetting process -- when, the process is working just fine. People with problems are dropping out. Idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. but don't you think these issues should have been raised prior to announcing
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 04:24 PM by mod mom
the nomination? I'm not quite sure but I would think the "vetting process" doesn't just leave the looking for indiscretions to the nominee.

That said, I believe the fact that Daschle stepped aside is a victory for the netroots, who jointly said "What about "change"?

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Maybe so but isn't the bigger picture, the process works?
The vetting process doesn't really stop until the guy is confirmed, does it?

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Traditionally I would think that the vetting process was an inside job, but now
with the advent of the internet and the ability to mobilize and spread information quickly, I'd say you are correct, Ms Ferrari, that the vetting process continues until the person is confirmed. It's part of the new bottom up governing. The process is working because of folks paying attention and getting involved.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Any resemblance between the "everyday reality" that some see and that which ...
... the ordinary American sees is purely trivial and coincidental ... if it exists at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Unless
failure to pay taxes is an ethical issue.

Just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. On a scale of one to ten of horrible unethical behavior
it's on the scale but nowhere near invading a country and strip mining our treasury and their resources to line your pockets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Unethical behavior
is behavior that does not conform to accepted standards of right and wrong social or professional actions. It is corrupt, dishonest, and dishonorable.

Behavior that is unethical may have fewer negative consequesnces than other behavior. That does not make the ethical violation less egregious. Wrong is wrong even if no one is harmed.

As long as we excuse some behaviors and by implication accept the conduct it will continue. I'm sure the next crop of elected tax cheats are busy avoidng their tax obligations now. And why shouldn't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. It's not a matter of excusing anything. Ethics is the greatest good for the greatest number.
Some unethical behavior is more widely harmful and one doesn't have to pile on adjectives to understand that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. No
It is wrong to deeive another even if nobody gets hurt because the folks who heard the lie happened to know that the person who told it was full of shit. Bernie Madoff was wrong in every attempt he made to defraud a potential investor - even if those folks never gave him a dime.

True, some unethical behavior has more severe consequences than other unethical behavior. But the fact that the consequences of some unethical behavior is less severe does not excuse the offense. It is the conduct that offends and is wrong - even in the absence of hurtful consequences. Ends do not justify or excuse means.

Judging whether behavior is acceptable by whether or not it serves the majority exploits and does violence to minorities and their interests. And it is potentially a great justification for all sorts of attrocities.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I guess I don't understand where you're getting the "excuse it" idea. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I'm not excusing any of the wrongdoers
and that includes the tax cheats.

There is no scale of one to ten of horrible unethical behavior. Tax cheats are strip mining our treasury and using our resources to line their pockets. Is it more acceptable to steal from one's own country than it is to steal from another country? No. Both are equally wrong. The methods may differ and the consequences to others may differ but both violations are wrong. The conduct is wrong not because of the consequences but because of the nature of the behavior itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corruptmewithpower Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. If I was a politician, I'd be sorely tempted to have ethical issues.
Divide two or three trillion or so dollars by 100 senators and you get a lot of spending power for each one every year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC