Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feingold: 'Deal-making' to replace Sen. Gregg 'alarmingly undemocratic'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 08:52 PM
Original message
Feingold: 'Deal-making' to replace Sen. Gregg 'alarmingly undemocratic'
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Feingold_Dealmaking_to_replace_Sen._Gregg_0203.html

Ron Brynaert
Published: Tuesday February 3, 2009


A top Democratic senator who is planning to introduce an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would prevent governors from filling US Senate vacancies – after the controversy surrounding Gov. Blogojevich who was indicted for allegedly offering President Obama's former seat to the highest bidder – had strong words to say about the latest open seat situation Tuesday.

In a statement congratulating Republican Senator Judd Gregg who was tapped by Obama to become his Secretary of Commerce, Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) said that he was "well qualified" since "his service for several years as Chair of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, and State has given him a solid grounding on Commerce Department programs."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have to agree with that
Hell, after the last three fiascos- and this ridiculous situation- I don't see how anyone wouldn't agree.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree with him, but I don't know about "alarming" for the Gregg situation
For a current Senator to say that he'll only take a presidential appointment if the senate remains at it's current split, is not exactly "alarming" since it seems to have happened a number of times recently, though it is undemocratic to let the governor choose. The selling of a seats based on what someone can do for a governor or his war chest, now THAT is alarmingly undemocratic. In any case, I agree that a vacated senate seat should go to the people for a vote instead of to the highest bidder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sorry, dupe. n/t
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 09:35 PM by hughee99
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Same old nonsense ...
as if there wasn't a more qualified expert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC