Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are Students the New Indentured Servants?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:44 AM
Original message
Are Students the New Indentured Servants?
Are Students the New Indentured Servants?

By Jeffrey J. Williams, Dissent Magazine. Posted February 5, 2009.

College student-loan debt has revived the spirit of indenture for a sizable proportion of contemporary Americans.



When we think of the founding of the early colonies, we usually think of the journey to freedom, in particular of the Puritans fleeing religious persecution to settle the Massachusetts Bay Colony. But it was not so for a majority of the first Europeans who emigrated to these shores. "Between one-half and two-thirds of all white immigrants to the British colonies arrived under indenture,” according to the economic historian David W. Galenson, a total of three hundred thousand to four hundred thousand people. Indenture was not an isolated practice but a dominant aspect of labor and life in early America.

Rather than Plymouth, Jamestown was a more typical example of colonial settlement, founded in 1607 as a mercantile venture under the auspices of the Virginia Company, a prototype of "joint-stock” corporations and venture capitalism. The first colonists fared badly because, coming primarily from gentry, they had little practical skill at farming and were ravaged by starvation and disease. In 1620, the Virginia Company shifted to a policy of indentured servitude to draw labor fit to work the tobacco colonies. Indenture had been a common practice in England, but its terms were relatively short, typically a year, and closely regulated by law. The innovation of the Virginia Company was to extend the practice of indenture to America, but at a much higher obligation, of four to seven years, because of the added cost of transit, and also because of the added cost of the brokerage system that arose around it. In England, contracts of indenture were directly between the landowner and servant, whereas now merchants or brokers in England’s ports signed prospective workers, then sold the contracts to shippers or to colonial landowners upon the servants’ arrival in America, who in turn could re-sell the contracts.

By about 1660, planters "increasingly found African slaves a less expensive source of labor,” as Galenson puts it. An economically minded historian like Galenson argues that the system of indenture was rational, free, and fair -- one had a free choice to enter into the arrangement, some of those indentured eventually prospered, and it was only rational that the terms be high because of the cost of transit -- but most other historians, from Edmund S. Morgan to Marcus Rediker, agree that indentured servitude was an exploitive system of labor, in many instances a form of bondage akin to slavery. For the bound, it meant long hours of hard work, oftentimes abuse, terms sometimes extended by fiat of the landowner, little regulation or legal recourse for laborers, and the onerous physical circumstances of the new world, in which two-thirds died before fulfilling their terms.

College student-loan debt has revived the spirit of indenture for a sizable proportion of contemporary Americans. It is not a minor threshold that young people entering adult society and work, or those returning to college seeking enhanced credentials, might pass through easily. Because of its unprecedented and escalating amounts, it is a major constraint that looms over the lives of those so contracted, binding individuals for a significant part of their future work lives. Although it has more varied application, less direct effects, and less severe conditions than colonial indenture did (some have less and some greater debt, some attain better incomes) and it does not bind one to a particular job, student debt permeates everyday experience with concern over the monthly chit and encumbers job and life choices. It also takes a page from indenture in the extensive brokerage system it has bred, from which more than four thousand banks take profit. At core, student debt is a labor issue, as colonial indenture was, subsisting off the desire of those less privileged to gain better opportunities and enforcing a control on their future labor. One of the goals of the planners of the modern U.S. university system after the Second World War was to displace what they saw as an aristocracy that had become entrenched at elite schools; instead they promoted equal opportunity in order to build America through its best talent. The rising tide of student debt reinforces rather than dissolves the discriminations of class, counteracting the meritocracy. Finally, I believe that the current system of college debt violates the spirit of American freedom in leading those less privileged to bind their futures. ........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.alternet.org/workplace/121955/are_students_the_new_indentured_servants/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm amazed at the amount of debt people will rack up for college
50-100k +... it seems a bit crazy to me. I spent about 15k on college in the 80's, and like so many others, left school already in debt. I threw off the chains and went traveling for a few years, but eventually had to face that debt. It's almost paid down now, but I feel bad for people who are wracking up much higher debt these days, all in the name of education.

My personal belief is in social reformation through erudition, and that knowledge, and the tools to attain it, should be free.

Just my two cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. I owed nothing
Nada, zip, pip, when I graduated. Of course, I graduated from college in the 1970's, when my middle class parents could afford to send me to college without taking out a second mortgage. The Repubs have managed to turn the heat up on students so that it is now a rolling boil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. yeah, my parents lost their business in the Reagan Recession
so I had to cover the cost myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why is it more so in America? What other countries do this to their children?
The rising tide of student debt reinforces rather than dissolves the discriminations of class, counteracting the meritocracy. Finally, I believe that the current system of college debt violates the spirit of American freedom in leading those less privileged to bind their futures. ........(more)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. There is another aspect to this whole thing:
Internships. Now, some of them may well be valuable to the student, of that there is no question. On the other hand, as I go through my job searches, I cannot help but notice that some of these positions are exploitative, brazen attempts to fill what should be paying jobs with free labor in the name of internships.

That ain't right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Rich kids do them and make connections. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. we are all indentured servants.
you go to college, and come out with lots of student loans to pay off. so you have to play the game and keep your head down and don't rock the boat so you can eke out a living to pay back the loans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. Good Ol' Uhmerica. If you want to get even slightly ahead in life, you'd better COUGH UP.
Not just talking blood, sweat and tears, here. We're talking about time and most importantly, MONEY. And you'd better have LOTS of it, or get used to flippin' burgers for a livin', brother. Because after the corporatists are through, there isn't going to be a living wage job to be had or a pot to piss in, and the window's fast-a-closin'.

College? COUGH up. Study on your own all you want, blah blah blah, but guess what? Employers want SKINS (even though it's doubtful any of them even check). And you can forget about just associates degrees. Today's bachelor's degrees are yesterday's high school diplomas. Hell, even MBAs are getting laid off with regularity nowadays and a recent article states that PhDs aren't even the guarantee they once were.

Want to start a business? COUGH up. "BECOME the owner". Riiiiiiiiiight. You know, because we ALL have tons of start-up capital, a product to sell, an audience for that product, money to pay for medical care, repeat business and an insane amount of luck which will drive us to be the 1 out of 10 small businesses that DOESN'T fail. We can sure pay the bills on THAT crapshoot. Ask several DUers who own businesses how easy it is. Republican Libertarians think it's easy, so it MUST be so. That's because many of them aren't DOING it.

Want a place to live? You know the drill.

Got a disease or a health condition because you weren't born lucky? SORRY. We're insurance conglomerates. We're too strong, too numerous and you ain't got a SHRED of hope in the world for that "universal health care" nonsense. We're not in business for our health, much less yours. COUGH up, and we're not talking cold germs. Got a couple hundred . . . thousand handy?

We live in a world where mere survival almost completely depends on one being employed. We live in a world where getting sick means the END of your world as you know it. We live in a world where we fear rich people so much we wouldn't THINK of harming them or making their lives less comfortable in ANY way, even if it means losing everything we worked so hard for at their behest.

We don't value education, we don't value our brothers and sisters well being, we treat everything as a rigid box rather than a flowing circle, we waste far too much money, time and toil for the needs of an overfed handful and we're too entrenched in vanity wars against sovereign nations that have done nothing to harm ONE American citizen.

It's a disgrace. An absolute fucking DISGRACE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. You said it so well.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. Recommended sub-thread
That would make a great OP, HughB. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. Value of the education
The economic value of the education is not solely depnedent upon how many years are spent in study. But in what the aggregate lifetime earnings differential is. Hence many careers/degrees have very little economic value. The question for us as a society is why do "we" believe the services of the art historian is less valuable than the security guard at the same museum? Is a Ramirez worth 1000 times as much as a Art Historian? What about the person who services the brakes on a firetruck? What about the engineer who designed the brakes?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I seriously doubt a security guard is paid more than an art historian at a museum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. According to Simply Hired
The Museum Security Guard averages $4k per year more than the Museums Art Historian. $37K vs $41k
And for comparison the MSChE $83k

simplyhired.com/a/salary/search/q-Museum+Security+Guard

simplyhired.com/a/salary/search/q-Museum+Art+Historian

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
potisok Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. I owe my soul to the company store
Dollar bill is softer than the whip. So I will behave myself for now toting that barge and lifting that bale. Being a wage slave sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'll be so in debt when I graduate...
with my PhD that I'll basically have a small mortgage on my brain. But I've been in school for 11 years now, and 2.5 of those I spent in California, where if you didn't take out loans, you'd starve or be living in a tent. It's not much better now, where my pay is just at the poverty level.

But it'll get paid. I don't worry too much about it. This why I have no kids yet and no mortgage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
14. I take this opportunity to plug Geogia's free tuition + some book money plan....

... to any GA public university as long as the person graduates from a GA high school with a 3.0 GPA or you move to GA, enroll for a year and prove your 3.0 college GPA. They also give some money (but not necessarily enough) to cover private university tuition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
17. Only if they thought borrowing money for their education was a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC