Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Big shout out for the Wyden-Snowe amendment!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 12:22 PM
Original message
Big shout out for the Wyden-Snowe amendment!!!
Edited on Thu Feb-05-09 12:24 PM by RiverStone
Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Olympia Snowe, R-Me., have put forward a plan to claw back bonuses already paid to senior executives at firms that received TARP money in the final quarter of 2008.

It would give companies a choice: either they could return any amount paid in bonuses over $100,000 to executives immediately, or pay a 35% excise tax on the bonus over $100,000. Wyden argued the firms borrowed billions from the Treasury and will have to pay back the full amount over time. His amendment would enable them to avoid the penalty tax by paying an amount equivalent to the excess bonus amounts back within 120 days of the stimulus bill being passed.

"This is wrong, this is not right to give these excessive bonuses with taxpayer money," said Wyden on the floor of the Senate.

http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200902041315DOWJONESDJONLINE000663_FORTUNE5.htm


This is a good start to holding the greedy bastards accountable who spent YOUR money (to save their company's ass) on lavish bonuses --- 18 billion worth. They are still getting off too easy; even with this, they get to keep $100K. Most of us don't even come close to making that kind of money in a year...

Kudo's to Senators Ron Wyden and Olympia Snowe for at least trying to get some of it back. :applause:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't know--making something retroactive like this is going to be
very difficult to enforce, and could be challenged in court. Should have just been done originally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. IANAL but think RICO should be used. They defrauded the government by having less assets and being
in worse financial shape BECAUSE OF THE BONUSES HANDED OUT.

RICO offenses

Under the law, racketeering activity means:
Any violation of state statutes against gambling, murder, kidnapping, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion, dealing in obscene matter, or dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in the Controlled Substances Act);
Any act of bribery, counterfeiting, theft, embezzlement, fraud, dealing in obscene matter, obstruction of justice, slavery, racketeering, gambling, money laundering, commission of murder-for-hire, and several other offenses covered under the Federal criminal code (Title 18);
Embezzlement of union funds;
Bankruptcy or securities fraud;
Drug trafficking;
Money laundering and related offenses;
Bringing in, aiding or assisting aliens in illegally entering the country (if the action was for financial gain);
Acts of terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Hmm. That's food for thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Snowe is speaking out back here against the stimulus
says too much of it may be good policy but doesn't stimulate jobs.

They don't seem to get that a proposal can do more than 1 thing to stimulate the economy. Jobs is critical. So is stopping home foreclosures. So is supporting small businesses. So is a lot of stuff....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. If she votes against vote for the stimulus, there's not much chance we will
get the vote for cloture. Collins and Specter would follow her on voting no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. About time. If we did an audit of the 8 years and sued for the money
back we could go a long way toward fixing out debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. How about you just charge them with embezzlement.
Throw them in jail. That way their companies have to fire their incompetent asses. Then seize all their assets and use it to put people to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. woohoo...heads are spinning!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is exactly why we don't want him at HHS. He's one of the good guys. He's smart and well
liked and committed to healthcare reform. He can do a lot to help get legislation through. Go Ron.:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm proud to call this "bi-partisanship I can believe in"!!
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC