kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 10:35 AM
Original message |
Taxcuts in "jobs bill" is continuation of Bush policies. |
|
At the present time, 38% of the so-called "stimulus bill" is for taxcuts, most sought by the Republicans. This is already a victory for the Republicans but they want more. They are holding up the bill in attempts to get more taxcuts. They understand the natural impatience of the Democratic Party and they believe they can squeeze more taxcuts out of the Democrats.
If the Democrats go along with these taxcuts, it is nothing more but a continuation of the failed Bush and Reagan taxcut policies of the last 28 years. We don't need to "cut" taxes - we need to raise taxes. It is a fallacy to believe that higher taxes keep companies from investing or hiring. It only makes them work harder for their money. They do not hire from the goodness of their heart or because they have more money on hand, they hire if they think they can make more money for their stockholders and CEOs.
The Democrats are losing this battle. How will they repeal the Bush tax cuts or let them expire after this new round of "tax cuts"?
|
SammyWinstonJack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 10:39 AM
Response to Original message |
|
:banghead: :argh:
The more things change, the more they remain the same
|
ixion
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message |
2. we don't need to raise taxes, we need to spend what taxes there are more prudently |
|
like, for one, cutting the hell out of the military budget.
|
MNDemNY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Without the tax cuts we would not have received all of those Republican votes.
|
tyne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
in the bill go to middle and lower income earners. They're the type of tax cuts that work.
|
MNDemNY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
10. Tax cuts do not work, I'm not saying these tax cuts are a bad thing, but... |
|
they do little to stimulate the economy, and restore jobs.Should be in a separate bill that also ends the bush tax cuts.
|
stray cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message |
5. I thought tax cuts were for low incomes who would spend it unlike Bush's |
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. What taxcuts are for low-income ?? |
|
Paul Krugman said they were similar to the Bush tax cuts.
|
Vinca
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 11:35 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Cut taxes on what? If your job is gone there is nothing to be taxed. nt |
liberal N proud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message |
7. 38% and it is still not enough for the asshole republicans |
|
Who think that spending money on creating jobs is PORK.
:banghead:
|
Still Sensible
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-06-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message |
9. So the other side aren't the only ones distorting the truth |
|
To throw out the canard that the tax relief included in the President's Recovery Act package is the same as the tax cuts as have been promoted by the Bush-led GOP is just plain wrong!
The tax relief in this package is essentially to benefit the middle class and ALL working Americans. This proposal even makes sure that it is done through the payroll mechanism so that working people have more money in their paycheck... money they will spend. Even if a worker ultimately doesn't make enough to "pay" taxes at the end of the year, they'll still benefit.
President Obama promised during the campaign that he would lower taxes for 95% of Americans. This is part of him keeping that promise. I'm sorry you don't like it, but it is one reason (of many) that he got elected. I consider it disingenuous at best to equate what has been incorporated into this legislation and the ineffective "tax cuts" of the Bush regime.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:29 AM
Response to Original message |