Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pelosi Calls Cuts to Stimulus Bill ‘Very Damaging’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 08:10 PM
Original message
Pelosi Calls Cuts to Stimulus Bill ‘Very Damaging’
Pelosi Calls Cuts to Stimulus Bill ‘Very Damaging’
By Kate Phillips


WILLIAMSBURG, Va. — The House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, refused to give any ground today, despite the fact that the Senate was preparing to reduce the size of the stimulus package by billions of dollars that she probably will not be able to recoup during the conference sessions next week.

Ms. Pelosi, Democrat of California, said she had spoken with the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, earlier today, wryly adding that both Mr. Reid and the Obama administration were well aware of her views and concerns about cutting billions of dollars in proposed aid for education, for example.

Asked about reported cuts in education spending and other matters like technology that may emerge from the Senate stimulus package as early as tonight, Ms. Pelosi said that those types of cuts were “very damaging” and that she was “very much opposed to them.” She pointed to the views of the governors who appeared before about 200 House Democrats gathered here, who had advocated such spending to maintain teaching levels and to build schools.

Asserting that the House had carefully considered the balance to help states maintain jobs and create jobs, Ms. Pelosi said: “We have put ourselves on the line to say the choices that are made will do the job to turn the economy around, and it will give confidence to consumers to families trying to send their children to school, to investors, to the markets….”

more...

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/06/pelosi-calls-cuts-to-stimulus-bill-very-damaging/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't go along with them, then- You have the power, Pelosi. Use it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yup get Obamas back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonCoquixote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Pelosi
I know that I have lambasted you, namely because you have been worse than worthless. However, if you had to grow a spine, I would welcome it, if not, just wait till Cindy Sheehan drives you out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama needs to veto this POS "compromise" bill.
And keep vetoing it until they send him something that will actually HELP SAVE THE AMERICAN ECONOMY, not just be a BS notch on their belts for their next campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. So you think no bill is better than a compromise? I'd really have to
see what would be passed and how much good it might do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. In this case - yes.
He's got to show them that he's not going to play ball with their childish bullshit, that he's serious about doing what's right for the COUNTRY.

But somehow I suspect that Mr. "Reach Across the Aisle" will sign it.
And it'll fail.
And in 2 years, the GOP will take back the majority because they'll label it 'his' stimulus bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think and hope you are woefully underestimating Prez Obama. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I just hope he isn't underestimating the selfish GOP & Moderate Dems.
:hi: They've not exhibited a track record of doing what's right for the people of this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I don't think he is; he's playing their game. I have to think he knows
who he's dealing with. And I always think he's three chess moves ahead. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. do you have crystal ball or something the GOP will take back the majority
I don't think so, and I don't think Obama is that type of a person to roll over either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. If the economy doesn't turn around ...
... and with this incarnation of the bill, I don't think it will - in the mid-terms, the GOP is likely to capitalize on the public's ongoing frustration/lack of jobs etc and yes, they'll probably take back the majority because voters don't pay close attention to bills as they're coming up the hill and have very short memories as to who actually sponsored what.

Hell, maybe that's why the GOP's torpedo'd the original bill and replaced it with all the tax cut crap in the first place.


No need to be snarky dear, it's just my opinion based on 20 years' experience watching this kind of stuff. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. No he shouldn't veto it. The House and the White House can make changes
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 08:46 PM by Thrill
and then all you need is 50 votes in the Senate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cash_thatswhatiwant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. THEY BETTER NOT HAVE CUT MONEY FOR SCHOLARSHIPS IS ALL I KNOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Tell it to the rethugs. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC