Evolution DISPROVED!!!1 Fish cannot decide to stroll out of the water & decide to walk!

[Bluebear]

The debate has been settled. Because fish cannot walk, there is no evolution. :crazy:


====

*NEWSFLASH ]] Fish comes out of water: FISH DIES!!**
1) Walking Catfish-The "walking skill" is used to move to other sources of water.
Fish out of water. Fish dies.
Creation 1 ------------------------Evolution 0

2) Lungfish- There has been a Queensland lungfish at the Shedd Aquarium in Chicago since 1933. How did it get their? Did it "walk"? And why is it still in the water?
Fish out of water. Fish dies.
Creation 2------------------------Evolution 0

3) Mudskippers- Mudskippers can breathe through their skin and the lining of their mouth, but they must be wet.
Fish out of water. Fish dies.
Creation 3------------------------Evolution 0
4) Gar Fish -I have seen a garfish die out of the water with my own eyes. <<(observation)
Fish out of water. Fish dies.
Creation 4------------------------Evolution 0

Do the evolutionists have any more fish? Go fish.

http://www.christiandiscussionforums.org/v/showthread.php?p=4164565#poststop

[H2O Man]

1. Shaved Fish

was a good Lennon album.

[skooooo]

25. I remember that album..

..bought it as a kid. Boy I'm old now!

[Horse with no Name]

2. Neither can sperm.

Next?:evilgrin:

[Hello_Kitty]

3. Ever go to Fundies Say the Darndest Things?

It's hours of fun. http://fstdt.com/

[GrantDem]

30. Really?

God told us everything we need to know in plain English in the KJV Bible. We don’t need to know about the internets to get to Heaven.
ToGodBeTheGlory, Free Republic <2009-Feb-07>

Submitted by Ivy Mike

[JFN1]

4. Well, you can tune a piano but you can't tuna fish

Or so I've heard...!!

[Horse with no Name]

6. REO Speedwagon

Righteous dude.:)

[Fuzz]

5. Astounding logic. Game, set, match.

[HopeHoops]

7. One fish, two fish, red fish, blue fish

[sakabatou]

8. ::facepalm::

[Ikonoklast]

9. I guess they never considered gradually decreasing oxygen

levels dissolved in water over the course of say, 250,000,000 years to see what might happen to said fish. Or a gradually drying climate decreasing the amount of liquid water not tied up in icecaps or glaciers.

These people are too stupid to realize that in the overall scheme of things, the total sum of their lifetimes' experience is negligible compared to the time spans involved in evolution of species.

Of course, if they believe the Earth is six thousand years old, then they are just willfully ignorant buffoons.

[vanderBeth]

18. I remember the first the first thing my Biology teacher taught us about evolution.

And he told us to remember it. Individuals do not evolve. Populations evolve

[vanderBeth]

10. *heads explodes from such perfect logic*

[Bluebear]

11. It's just. well, elegant logic!

:silly:

[shadowknows69]

12. Um, this one can

<http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/mudskipper>

[Lars39]

13. And for the deniers: Snakehead fish walk on land:

http://nationalzoo.si.edu/Publications/ZooGoer/2004/2/snakehead.cfm

Creepy things. :scared:

[rd_kent]

14. Wow! At the very best

that argument disputes evolution, but does absolutely nothing to PROVE creation. Those points have been taken off the board.

[marmar]

15. There's something fishy about that discussion forum.....

:hide:

[Ikonoklast]

28. *Ahem*. There is something

sea-kittenish about that discussion forum.

Please.


:P

[Vickers]

16. THAT DOES IT! I'm going to start sending 10% of my paycheck

to a millionaire TV preacher every week.

:rofl:

[tsuki]

17. :forehead slap: You're cured. Keep your 10%. nt

[hedgehog]

19. Where do the bananas come in?

[corruptmewithpower]

20. What's so great about walking?

You can't decide to breath water or swim the deep ocean-so there's no evolution?

:wtf:

[alcibiades_mystery]

21. It's very simple: these people don't understand timescale

The rest of the world realized some time around 1600 that the human timescale is remarkably inadequate for understanding natural phenomena, because it is so relatively short. Consciousness, any one consciousness, lasts, at most 115 or so years. That's nothing. We marvel that a fruit fly only lives three days, or something like that, but in the evolutionary scale, we're something akin: 75-90 years may as well be three days. Now, the "fruit fly" consciousness could never comprehend even the most obvious things that we comprehend about temporality, like the seasons. The fruitfly simply cannot fathom the seasons as a phenomenon, because its timeframe is so limited. So it is with humans. We have a hard time even conceptualizing what a million years might be like, largely because ou5r consciousness could only last a small fraction of that. Of course, the birth of modern science involves moving the viewpoint outside the human consciousness, de-centering (which is to say, de-anthropo-centering) the scientific viewpoint: spatially by inverting the geocentric theory of the universe, and temporally by expanding the time scales of phenomena.

The fundies don't get it. They're like the fruitflies who would deny the change of seasons because they cannot conceptualize it. I should say that it is a thoroughly consistent stupidity. They consider the human the center of the universe, as almost all pre-modern thought does. And if the human is the center of the universe, then whether a particular human has actually seen a fish survive out of water is the key deciding point on evolution. It's a consistent stupidity. The only thing that's inconsistent is that they assent to sun as the center of the solar system. They should, in fact, deny even that. I suspect many secretly do, and would publicly if it wouldn't utterly discredit them.

[donco6]

22. Fundie tries to think . . . Fundie fails.

Evolution 4.5 billion . . . . Fundamentalism 0

[surrealAmerican]

23. Whatever you do, don't let this person see a tadpole.

He seems to have mistaken evolution for metamorphosis.

[Crunchy Frog]

24. Well that's a convincing argument. Guess I'll have to become a creationist now.

[dysfunctional press]

26. tadpole- swimming in the water...

becomes a frog and walks out...

haven't they ever heard of amphibians?

[shadowknows69]

27. Actually evolution does have a problem when it comes to the Platypus

Although I've always wanted to own one.

[Brazenly Liberal]

31. Evolution has no problem with the platypus :-)

That was settled ages ago. :)

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/platypus.html

[shadowknows69]

32. Bummer, I was hoping they were proof of alien life on earth.

[Brazenly Liberal]

29. Oh My Cod!!!

Well, that's it. I guess they grokked the secret Achilles heel of evolutionists (by which I mean educated people with brains and common sense). It was a nice ride, but it's all over. We've been found out. We're done.

[hayu_lol]

33. There once was a large water animal...

that wandered out on land over a long period of time. Stayed fully on land for another long period of time. Food sources must have gotten better in the water, so the animals returned to the water.

What are these animals called?

Whales. The large rear flukes of the tail were once upon a time, hip bones.

Where in the KJV is anything said about the most conclusive evidence--DNA. DNA tells the entire story.

[Marr]

34. Ah- nonsequitur logic. I love it. Care to see my proof that the universe is expanding?

Here it is:

Oreos are delicious.

Expanding Universe 1 ------------------------Contracting Universe 0