Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dear Strategerists: Obama's non-answer on Bushco proves the dangers of not impeaching at the time

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 09:52 PM
Original message
Dear Strategerists: Obama's non-answer on Bushco proves the dangers of not impeaching at the time
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 09:53 PM by omega minimo
Yes, Nancy got her House and Senate.

Yes, a Democrat won the White House.

Yes, the investigations never occurred during the unimpeached criminal Bush/Reagan adminstrations.

Yes, the investigations never occurred during the unimpeached criminal Bush/Cheney adminstrations.

Yes, it's the same cast of characters.

No, Obama can't answer the question about investigating Bushco any differently.

No, not even being a Constitutional scholar!!

He's in the President's Club now.

Congratulations.

"Too Popular To Be Impeached" Reagan/Bushco

followed by "Too Annoying To Be Serviced In The Oval Office" Clinton

followed by "Too Criminal To Be Believed" Bushco.

This is your history, your legacy, your American government.

This is what you get when the People and the People's representatives refuse the right,

The right and only recourse -- and for Congress, the sworn duty --

To wield the scalpel of impeachment (yes, investigations)

Provided by the Framers

To cut out the cancer feeding at the heart of the nation

To protect and defend

The Constitution of the United States.

This is what you get

When you let a pResident say it's just a DAMN PIECE OF PAPER and wipe his ass with it,

When you tell yourself impeachment wouldn't be strategeric and

"It's only on principle."

This what you get.

An eloquent, idealistic President

With unprecedented powers cobbled together by the Imperial Executive executors,

Operating within and controlled by a

System with no principle.




It was a great speech.


It's too late.


This is where we live.


Just a damn piece of paper.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. what part of the JUDICIAL branch and not the executive would prosecute do you not understand?
Basic civics?

He said noone is above the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. he sidestepped. as the OP says, he answered the way he has to, under the circumstances
this is where we live. no need to twist you knickers.


what part of basic civics don't you understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. "Basic Civics"
Criminal offenses are prosecuted by the Department of Justice, which is indeed part of the Executive branch of the federal government.

Civil offenses (abuses of the power of office) are prosecuted by the Legislative branch of the federal government.

The Judicial branch of the government never prosecutes crimes. Hence, while I: (a) agree that Bush & Cheney should have been impeached; and (b) do not believe that it is unlikely that some people from the previous administration will indeed be prosecuted on criminal charges, neither view is based on your grasp of "basic civics." You were correct, and the DUer who said that you do not grasp "basic civics" erred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. I appreciate
your clarification for all our benefit. The basic civics lesson that a timely impeachment provides every century or so is invaluable.

Also appreciate that you "do not believe that it is unlikely that some people from the previous administration will indeed be prosecuted on criminal charges"

That would be something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. The judicial branch
does not prosecute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. "Noone" is above
basic civics

:hi: H2O Man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
24. You need to back to the books. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
25. You need to back to the books. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BirminghamExaminer Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I disagree
I thought Obama dangled the answer out there like a carrot. He definitely said that if wrongdoing was done, it would be addressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. "IF"
yeah, that was pretty bad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blues90 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I got the impression that as he said before he is looking or moving forward
and anyone who comminits a crime now and after he got ofice would not get away with it again but this statement leaves the BCF out and free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. right, it's deftly done. I wouldn't even say it is his role now. It was the
strategerists and Congresscowards role at the time, to get the concept or face that they're throwing it away.

Some were ignorant and some were under the gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. .
I didn't hear the speech so my world hasn't ended.

I hope their crimes become known by everyone, in their entirety. We can't heal a disease we won't acknowledge.

:hug:

Everything will work out, everything's going to be OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Definitely check it out. Not only was Obama actually ELECTED he can THINK AND TALK
AT. THE. SAME. TIME.

That's cause for celebration right there.

Obama did what he had to do and is doing what he has to do.

He may do a lot of good.

............


The context is still what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yep, so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. What question is "Bushco?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Bushco "R" Us
the Leahy proposal question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. It wasn't a non-answer.
Nuanced, yes. But he said a great deal if you listen closely.

I agree with your point about impeachment though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. A nuan-answer
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Yer right, "he said a great deal if you listen closely" and what's striking was it's meaninglessness
hence the OP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. He said he favors prosecution
of Bush admin officials. You don't think that's significant?

In a question about Bush admin crimes he raised the issue of torture and violation of civil liberties.

So, if you listen closely, he named the types of crimes he thinks have been committed and said that he will support prosecution after Leahy does his investigations. I think you had a case of knee-jerk skepticism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. plausible deniability
"So, if you listen closely" you hear what you wanna hear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. If you don't listen past the first sentence
you can also hear what you want to hear. You don't seem to have an actual response to what I wrote about his statement. What is Obama plausibly denying? That doesn't even make sense.

Obama says he's for prosecuting Bush administration officials like any other criminal and you're still complaining about him agreeing with you. Amazing. A case of ideological blockage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. i don't fancy your
barbs :thumbsdown:

and owe you nothing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
18. My kick will put you on the greatest page ! Well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. glad you think so
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. I think he stll has a little time left for that n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
26. Reagan and Bush WERE INVESTIGATED and EXPOSED by Kerry and Gonzalez - Clinton deepsixed the matters
that were being exposed and would not facilitate access to documents that Poppy Bush and his cronies stonewalled, as many of us expected from a Democratic administration. He, instead, sided with the secrecy and privilege of GHWBush and the many thugs involved in IranContra, Iraqgate, BCCI and CIA drugrunning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
27. He is leaving it for the Senate and the Justice Department, where it SHOULD be
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. He's doing what he has to do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
28. ROFLMAO!!!!!! What A Hoot!!!
I love the DU Fringe!!!!!

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
32. Whuup there it is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
33. it's not too late, he can investigate and/or prosecute
Patrick Leahy just yesterday proposed a truth and reconciliation commission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC