Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nader on Hartmann: Tobin Tax would...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:47 AM
Original message
Nader on Hartmann: Tobin Tax would...
Edited on Tue Feb-10-09 11:49 AM by WhaTHellsgoingonhere
...raise $500 billion a year AND discourage casino capitalism.

Nobel Laureate James Tobin proposed a 10-25 cents sales tax per $100 traded. Contact congress and let's demand a tiny Tobin Tax. I hope you agree :)
-wth

www.congress.org

Tax The Speculators
Let’s start with a fairness point. Why should you pay a 5 to 6 percent sales tax for buying the necessities of life, when tomorrow, some speculator on Wall Street can buy $100 million worth of Exxon derivatives and not pay one penny in sales tax?

<snip>

In that way, revenues can be raised at the same time as the taxes discourage those activities which are least valued, such as the most speculative stock market trades, pollution (a carbon tax), gambling, and the addictive industries that sicken or destroy health and amass large costs.

So, your member of Congress, who is grappling these days with gigantic deficits on the backs of your children at the same time as that deep recession and tax cuts reduce revenues and increase torrents of red ink, should be championing such transaction taxes.

Yet apart from a small number of legislators, most notably Congressman Peter Welch (Dem. VT) and Peter DeFazio (Dem. OR), the biggest revenue producer of all—a tax on stock derivative transactions—essentially bets on bets—and other mystifying gambles by casino capitalism—is at best corridor talk on Capitol Hill.

There are differing estimates of how much such Wall Street transaction taxes can raise each year. A transaction tax would, however, certainly raise enough to make the Wall Street crooks and gamblers pay for their own Washington bailout. Lets scan some figures economists put forth.

<snip>

University of Massachusetts economist, Robert Pollin, writes in the current issue of the estimable Boston Review: “A small tax (Nobel Laureate James Tobin proposed 10-25 cents per $100 traded) on all financial-market transactions, comparable to a sales tax, would raise the costs on short-term speculative trading while having negligible effect on people who trade infrequently. It would thus discourage speculation and channel funds toward productive investment.” He adds that after the 1987 stock market crash, securities-trading taxes “or similar measures” were endorsed by then Senate Minority Leader Bob Dole and even the first President Bush. Professor Pollin estimates that a one-half of one percent tax would raise about $350 billion a year. That seems conservative. The Wall Street Journal once mentioned about $500 trillion in derivatives trades alone in 2008—the most speculative of transactions. A one tenth of one percent tax would raise $500 billion dollars a year, assuming that level of trading
.

souce: Ralph Nader

http://www.nader.org/index.php?/archives/2101-Tax-The-Speculators.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. I've supported this since the very first time I heard about it, Pre-TARP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. PS - Thom Hartmann wrote about this first, on commondreams - might be less divisive source
than Nader.

Rep. Pete Defozio (D-OR) proposed this during the TARP debate - might be a good place to start with contacts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. You have to ask yourself why, in these times and after the results of
the parasites gambling with other people's money and then shuffling their losses off on us, has nobody in DC supported this yet?

Of course it is only another delay of the inevitable, but we need all we can get right now.

:kick: & R


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think I could support this
but with one amendment: people with income below a certain amount (I don't know how much, maybe $50,000) should be able to deduct the Tobin taxes on their federal tax return. I don't want to discourage middle income people from participating in the stock market. Otherwise, I think it is a worthy idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. uh oh
:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. omega, before I posted this I did a DU search on "Tobin Tax"
The only(?) thread that came up was the one you started in April 2003! lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. good thing there's no TobinHaters
ssshhhhhhh don't use the Nword here :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. great...
At least I put Hartmann's name in the title.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. mebbe the NaderHaters are busy being SirotaDoubters
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good idea. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kick & rec
It's a good idea. It's worth reposting without the N word in the title, to get more visibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Really? If it disappears into oblivion I'll do that. Thanks
Sheesh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. I know. There's a lot of resentment toward Nader here.
Personally, I think he's a stand-up guy, but a lot of DUers blame him for throwing the 2000 election. And since DU was founded on Jan. 20, 2001, we wouldn't be here if not for that outcome; so the numbers against him are disproportionately large here. I think it's best to avoid mentioning him if the subject is really the tax itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. DOH! :headsmack: Gottit! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. Make it progressive.
Smaller transactions get hit less, and the big speculators get hit more. Better yet, don't tax the transactions themselves, but rather hit up the big buyers at the end of the year, with nominal fees (or none) for individuals who buy few shares. The little guy doesn't need to be penalized for little investments.

Nader's not wrong about everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. If Nader said it it can't be a good thing.. just like seat belts were a terrible idea. /sarcasm off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. this is *hardly* n's idea; DEFAZIO (D-OR), WELCH (D-VT), Thom HARTMANN...
Edited on Tue Feb-10-09 05:02 PM by WhaTHellsgoingonhere
...among the MANY who endorse this idea. Some HERE have made excellent suggestions that would alter it slightly. :)

Of course, you knew that, and so do the others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Many of us like Nader's ideas as long as he stays out of politics and only
writes about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's a good idea but like many good ideas it would gore too many
sacred cows. Maybe after the herd gets thinned a bit by legislation, Congress can revisit this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. That's what I'm thinking. Through process of elimination, the may...
...be left with no alternative ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
22. Someone proposed a tax on derivatives back in 1993...
to reduce speculation as well as generate revenue, although I hesitate to post the link.

Just google derivatives tax + 1993 for the articles.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
23. .... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC