Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Wallstreet conspiring against Obama?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
yodoobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:34 PM
Original message
Is Wallstreet conspiring against Obama?
Edited on Tue Feb-10-09 01:37 PM by yodoobo
I swear every time Obama speaks and explains what is necessary to fix this mess we are in, they go and lower the DOW.

Obama did a fine speech last night, explained very well what needs to be done. How does Wallstreet react? They lower the DOW by 350 points today! Its Bullshit with a capital B!

Is it payback over capping wallstreet salaries at 1/2 million?

Wtf is going on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh please..
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodoobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I don't mean this as a conspiracy nonsense post
I'm just trying to understand wtf is going on.

The market should be going up. I'm so tired of my retirement slipping away due to these thieving bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. With all these dismal earning reports you still think the market should be going up?
Just because Obama delivered a magnificent speech?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. I thought the Dow was tanking because of Geithner saying what he wants to do
with the rest of the stimulus.

but I dont know too much about Economics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. TARP, not stimulus. What Geithner wants to do with the rest of the TARP, not the Stimulus (Recovery
Act) bill just passed by the Senate.

Just an FYI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. that's what I meant. the remainder of the 750 bil from a few months ago
I love these terms
TARP
Stimulus
Recovery
Jobs Bill

none of this even helps the root of the problem, but the names sound nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. the very wealthy have been stalling the inevitable so they can STEAL all the money
they can before it goes poof
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. and they have accomplished their goal of stealing too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. You've got to be kidding me.
Wall Street's only - I repeat, only - motivation is making money. They could give two shits about who's in charge. You know how we all complain when Wall Street jumps up after some big layoff is announced? That's because they are predicting that those layoffs will increase the profitablity of the company in the future, causing the stock price to jump, thereby increasing their (Wall Street's) profits.

Today they are making a huge, huge bet that the stimulus won't work. They may be right (I think they are) or they may be wrong, but to see an anti-Obama conspiracy in this is simply ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodoobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yes but their ability to make money is now limited to $500k/yr
Edited on Tue Feb-10-09 02:38 PM by yodoobo
If they had their man in there, there would be no such limits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. No, their salary is limited to 500k/yr. (debateably)
The ability of the companies they work for to make money is still limitless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. no -- they are conspiring against anything that isn't corporate welfare
It doesn't matter WHO is coming up with solutions. They will argue AGAINST *anything* that doesn't give them cash with no accountability, and no ceiling caps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. They dont want oversight of the billions more they were expecting
That word alone was enough to cause the spoiled children of privilege on Wall Street to sell off the market today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. No it was idiot Geitner speaking today that moved the market
His "plan" wasn't a plan more like a collection of half thought out ideas with no specifics.

If you "tease" the street about a "plan" for a couple weeks and then pull a Geitner the market is going to tank.
Hell if I could have got an advance copy of Geitner's speech yesterday I would have sold everything and bought SPY 90 Feb Puts.

Based on the transcripts of his speech is was 100% guaranteed the market was going to tank.

Quick tip for Geitner:
1) If you don't have a plan then shut the f**** up.
2) Better to have people think you are a fool then open your mouth and remove all doubt.
3) A plan is more than a rambling collection of ideas without details.
4) For the love of God don't say "we are devising a system to price the assets" because that means "we have no friggin clue on how much this crap is worth and likely never will".

If you have nothing to say then say nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. He hurt the Dow, no doubt.
But it's fallen further since the bill passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. S&P is only 3pts lower than it was when Geitner shut his mouth.
Plus a loss of confidence is hard to overcome. Market will likely move sideways with downward bias until Geitner (or somebody) shows the Street they know what the hell they are doing.

Today is the first day I doubt Obama pick of Geitner.

:wtf: WTF was Geitner thinking. He is a businessman. He understands the market.

The entire market was waiting for a plan. The rally over last couple days was anticipation that he had the plan. There was anticipation becasue he said he had the plan.

Then he gets out there and makes an ass of himself (and by proxy Obama). :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Well, I doubted the Geitner pick from the beginning,
as did many others who were collectively told to shut up here on DU.

Bernanke's trying to calm things now, and that's not working either. This whole thing is exactly the fiasco that many of us here predicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodoobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. I need to find a video of this Geitner speech
that I apparently missed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. It like they're holding their breath until they turn blue......they know
the new sheriff is coming gunning for them & the tarp money and they are scared shitless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. New?
"Mary L. Schapiro reported that she is getting a lump-sum payment of $5 million to $25 million from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the brokerage industry's self-regulating body she headed before joining the SEC last month."

"Schapiro, who received $2.8 million in salary and incentive compensation last year from FINRA, will make $162,900 this year as SEC chairman."


....
"Linda's achievements have been nothing short of extraordinary, even heroic, in an era of unprecedented challenges in our securities markets," said SEC Chairman Mary L. Schapiro. "Linda has distinguished herself in public service through her keen intellect, profound understanding of our securities laws, and relentless pursuit of wrongdoers. While Linda's wisdom, judgment, integrity and humor will be sorely missed by all of her colleagues, the agency and the investors we serve will always be grateful for Linda's service."

So Thomsen was clearly thrown to the dogs as the sacrificial lamb earlier this week but, come on, Schapiro's just as useless. And as Markopolos pointed out, corrupt.

01:02:11 MARKOPOLOS

01:02:39 REP.SHERMAN

....
01:05:01 REP.CASTLE

01:05:36 MARKOPOLOS

http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/index.php?main_page=product_video_info&products_id=283836-1

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=385&topic_id=269332&mesg_id=269442
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. No, against America, just as they have been for our whole lives.
This sector produces nothing, yet sucks up 1/3 of the economy.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. I wouldn't put it past them. They tried to stage a Fascist coup against FDR after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. It would seem what upset Wall Street was the lack of detail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
22. Wallstreet is simply responding to that atrocious "Caylee" memorial.
I dare you to prove me wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lifesbeautifulmagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
25. No n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
26. They might have to actually hire people back
bad for profits
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. And what exactly in this stimulus bill requires them to hire people back? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. I mostly meant the corporations they invest in
but we'll see
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
28. First of all, the salary caps are voluntary.
Second, Wall St. spent a fortune to get Obama elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
30. Nobody is more surprised than they are
They thought they could game the system forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
specialed Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
32. Transparency and Accountability....
Two things that make brokers and bankers crap themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC