Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ICE clearinghouse for CDS hung up on costs for lightly traded contracts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:04 PM
Original message
ICE clearinghouse for CDS hung up on costs for lightly traded contracts

By Matthew Leising

Feb. 10 (Bloomberg) -- Intercontinental Exchange Inc.’s planned clearinghouse for the $28 trillion credit-default swap market is stalled over pricing on less frequently traded contracts, Chief Executive Officer Jeff Sprecher said.

U.S. regulators and industry representatives are working with Intercontinental to create a system to determine prices for credit-default swaps that differ from the standard five-year contract, Sprecher said today on a conference call with analysts. Federal officials had hoped the clearing plans would be approved by the end of 2008, they said last year.

“There’s an interactive discussion” going on about how to price contracts that don’t trade often, Sprecher said. “That’s why the clearinghouse has not been approved. We’re working with the market on this.” Chief Financial Officer Scott Hill said regulatory approval may come “in the very near term.”

U.S. regulators and other government officials are pushing the creation of a clearinghouse for credit-default swaps after Lehman Brothers Inc., one of the largest dealers in the market, filed for bankruptcy in September. A clearinghouse reduces the risk that a counterparty such as Lehman will default on a trade and also creates prices for the contracts that are now privately traded in the bi-lateral over-the-counter market.


http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ajj6I1iqF1UQ&refer=home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. How about zero?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. And no one could foresee an impasse on prices for worthless assets...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The impasse is because of the trade volume on CDS that vary from the normal contract parameters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What does one expect on unregulated instruments?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Most are in the normal structure, but a true clearinghouse for CDS has to cover all

and the pricing on those that aren't traded like most is a bit problematic. I think the major concern is large swings in lightly traded contracts. They will come up with something, perhaps trade halts. I don't think they want instant margin calls on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Such a small portion of the contracts shouldn't hold up the majority
Trade halts or an established market price by regulators is the only two ways to go and still include these rarer instruments into the clearinghouse, me thinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC