Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Source: Petraeus Leaked Misleading Story on Pullout Plans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 10:37 AM
Original message
Source: Petraeus Leaked Misleading Story on Pullout Plans
Source: Inter Press Service

Source: Petraeus Leaked Misleading Story on Pullout Plans
Monday 09 February 2009
»
by: Gareth Porter, Inter Press Service


Washington - The political maneuvering between President Barack Obama and his top field commanders over withdrawal from Iraq has taken a sudden new turn with the leak by CENTCOM commander Gen. David Petraeus - and a firm denial by a White House official - of an account of the Jan. 21 White House meeting suggesting that Obama had requested three different combat troop withdrawal plans with their respective associated risks, including one of 23 months.

The Petraeus account, reported by McClatchy newspapers Feb. 5 and then by the Associated Press the following day, appears to indicate that Obama is moving away from the 16-month plan he had vowed during the campaign to implement if elected. But on closer examination, it doesn't necessarily refer to any action by Obama or to anything that happened at the Jan. 21 meeting.

The real story of the leak by Petraeus is that the most powerful figure in the U.S. military has tried to shape the media coverage of Obama and combat troop withdrawal from Iraq to advance his policy agenda - and, very likely, his personal political interests as well.

This writer became aware of Petraeus's effort to influence the coverage of Obama's unfolding policy on troop withdrawal when a military source close to the general, who insisted on anonymity, offered the Petraeus account on Feb. 4. The military officer was responding to the IPS story 'Generals Seek to Reverse Obama Withdrawal Decision' published two days earlier .

Read more: http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=45720



Why does he still have a job? Chain of command anybody?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Me thinks the general has grown used to a weak minded leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Me thinks that Gates is going to fire his ass.
His career in the military is over.

Sandbagging the Commander in Chief is a bad career move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Last night on The Daily Show
John had a guest with some surprising details of our generals attitude about command protocol. Seems he completely kept the bushman out of the loop.
Hope to see it again so I can order the dudes book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Thomas Ricks, author of "Fiasco" and "The Gamble"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Thanks
His name and book had slipped my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. You've got a bunch of neo-cons still in the Pentagon
Ironically because of civil service rules, originally meant to take the sticky fingers OUT of politics.

The Jacksonian Democrats of the 1830's understood that patronage, for all of it's faults, was the best way to ensure that the people staffing the government would be loyal to the democratically elected people who put them in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. a mini macarthur in the making. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. There needs to be some firings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. This traitor should be fired immediately, with no pension. rec'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. He's so vain, he thinks this war is about him, don't he?
Seriously, once generals see their name in the papers a few times, they start thinking they're star athletes trying to land a picture on a "Wheaties" box.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. petraeus needs to be reminded who his cic is....
Edited on Wed Feb-11-09 12:03 PM by spanone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. He thinks he's General MacArthur?
He must have forgotten about what Truman did?

He has given President Obama a great opportunity to show his authority and the civilian authority over the military. It would be a great lesson at this time. He should bring him on the carpet for a good chewing out and if he cannot get with the program, he should be fired or asked to resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think there is a desk job in Washington suited perfectly for this guy.
:shrug: I think Obama is sometimes too acquiescent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. Once again, BetrayUS lives up to his moniker.
Edited on Wed Feb-11-09 03:07 PM by DCKit
Just think of all the fine gubmint jobs that will be available after a thorough house cleaning of the Pentagram, departments and alphabet agencies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC