Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama advisers conclude efforts at bipartisanship were misguided

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:09 PM
Original message
Obama advisers conclude efforts at bipartisanship were misguided
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/02/13/obama-advisers-conclude-efforts-at-bipartisanship-were-misguided/

Earlier today, ThinkProgress highlighted “Obama’s wasted efforts at bipartisanship.” Reporting on the same subject, The New York Times’ Peter Baker writes that Obama advisers concluded that they mistakenly “allowed the measure of bipartisanship to be defined as winning Republican votes rather than bringing civility to the debate.” Center for American Progress President and CEO John Podesta said the problem was “wishful thinking“:

“I’m not sure I would describe it as naïve, but wishful thinking,” said John D. Podesta, a former White House chief of staff who ran Mr. Obama’s transition and still informally advises his team.

The White House will be able to “pick off” individual Republicans on individual issues, Mr. Podesta predicted, but will not be able to change the calculation made by the opposition party to be in opposition.

“What would make it change?” Mr. Podesta asked, referring to the Republican determination to challenge Mr. Obama. “If you’re going to do this at the moment of greatest need, at the height of his popularity, what sort of thing would get you to change?”

“Yes, we’ve learned some lessons from this,” said Obama adviser David Axelrod. “But primarily we’re happy with the way it turned out.”



links
Obama’s Wasted Efforts At Bipartisanship
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/02/13/obamas-bipartisanship/

Bipartisanship Isn’t So Easy, Obama Discovers
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/14/us/politics/14obama.html?_r=1&hp


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrPerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, duh?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ya think??!!!eleventy1111
At least Obama can say he tried, but that the asscarrots across the aisle are too recalcitrant for civilized discourse. If I never hear the word 'bipartisan' again - or see members of our party attempting what amounts to so much happy horseshit - it'll be too soon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds like the Obama fanatics are eating crow right now
It's nice that the Obama Admin admits mistakes. Putting bipartisansip over sound policy was a losing strategy with the Republicans today. Hope that Obama has learned his lesson and is tougher negotiating with Repukes in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I think the republicans are the ones that will end up losing for this.
The more they look like stubborn jackasses the less likely they'll have a seat to come back to. IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I'm not eating crow.
And neither is anybody else. All they (we) have to say from here on out is, "We tried to be nice to Republicans..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Nice guys finish last
and that is where Obama was heading until he wisely changed course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Too bad you're salivating
over it but nobody's eating crow. What a stupid thing to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I'm laughing at the Obama fanatics
They are not much different than the Bushies, who also could not admit when their leader was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RushIsRot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. Don't negotiate with the S.O.B.s! Just walk over them. We've got
the votes, don't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. Only the Obama hypercritics believe that the admin didn't see this coming.
Once again: anyone who thinks that Obama LOST OUT somehow in this is either still paranoid from years with the Bush admin, or simply not paying any attention to what's actually happening.

Obama gave the Republicans the choice of standing with the base and alienating the rest of America, or being bipartisan and angering the base. Guess which they chose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Really...he has the mandate...fire up the bulldozer & get threw the roadblock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. They tried toplay nice with the bastids, and it didn't work.
Now get out there and run over their asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think this is good in 2 ways.
1. They were able to recognize a flawed strategy and correct course.

2. They gave the R's a legitimate opportunity to cooperate and the R's publicly spit in their faces. The GOP has shown very publicly that it puts nasty partisan politics above everything else, even during a time of national crisis. In the future, when they whine about being left out of the policy-making process, nobody will take them seriously. Obama is now free to ignore them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. And they are free to lose their seats. Not some good thinkin' goin' on there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Yeah, people like Boehner. He's from Ohio, for F's sake.
They have some of the worst job losses and foreclosure problems in the country. I don't think people will be happy that he fought against the economic stimulus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert H. Hubert Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. someone has to post it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Al Franken will be arriving in a couple of weeks, and then we only need 1 more Senate vote
The House requires 218 votes to pass bills. We've got 256. No problem.

The "pickoff" strategy in the Senate. Once we get Franken in there, we just need one blue state Republican per bill. Depending on the issue there are many prospects: Lugar, the two girls from Maine, Voinovich, Specter, or Grassley. Again, every issue is different, but Obama ran well in all of these states and getting one of them to vote for cloture (not for the bill, but for cloture) should be do-able.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
30. I'm hoping that one of those Senators may switch their party to Ind.
The more rigid the Republicans become, the more they harangue those Senators who are willing to work with President Obama from time to time, the more clearly they see that today's Republican party is not one they want to be a member of!

I hope, I hope, I hope... }(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. doh!
won't say "I told you so."

Doh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. You know, the hardest thing to do is going from being equal to .....
going to rising in the establishment (been there and done that). President Obama's dilemma is no different than any of us that have gone from being a worker to being a boss. He is going to have to get thru this in his own way and I'm sure he will make mistakes in doing so. I am guessing that there is a reason that one doesn't move from the Senate to President (or Vice President or Secretary of State and we have had three of our Senators do this). I worked in a hotel for many years (same one) and moved up thru the ranks... It was very tough, cause I was resented for being able to make those moves...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. Cool...just don't let it happen again....banish the GOP to the Capitol basement !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. Repukes belong under the stairs..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. I think it worked out perfectly
If I were Obama, I'd tell the Repubs "Well, we tried to reach out to you and go the bi-partisan route. Since you're not interested, we'll just spend the next four years cramming through everything we want. If you don't like it, get bent!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. That's why I don't think it was a mistake.
From the beginning of the effort I thought it was a clever approach. Pres Obama certainly knew with whom he was dealing. I think he knew exactly what the result would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. Cenk Uygur's commentary on this here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. thanks for the link Hissyspit
I agree with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
21. We. told. you. so. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. of course
But now we are wrong, because we were right.

We say: "This moving to the right bipartisan stuff won't work."

They say: "We have to move to the right to get things done. It is a center right country! Kucinich lost! You are tearing down Our President and have a hidden agenda! You lefties are lunatics and are wrong!"

The moving to the right bipartisan stuff fails miserably, and the politicians abandon it.

They say: "See! You were wrong! Our President knows what he is doing, and we were right to 'support' him! You were wrong for 'tearing him down!'"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
26. I appaulaud their efforts, but I new it was a lost cause from the start..
but hey, He tried and that is what matters. He looks good for attempting and repukes look even more fascist and uncompromising then ever, I would not call Obama's efforts 'wasted'.

Now, I hope Obama/Dems steam rolls those fuckers and leave to to pout in the the corner because they cant have their way anymore. Boo fucking hoo I say, it is their mess that has to be cleaned up and a mess that they STILL deny and would claim that 'the fundamentals of the economy are strong'.

FUCK'EM I SAY! THOSE WORTHLESS LYING BAGS OF SHIT REPUKES!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
29. It's short sided to declare the efforts misguided and wasted.
IMO, President Obama is reaching out for the benefit (and support) of the public. We are observing his efforts and the lack of same from the Republicans. The Repukes look more and more rigid, radical and ridiculous. The pukes are painting themselves in a corner. He's thinking way ahead and not just for this round.

I like this post by damonm. Here's and excerpt:

"This is chess, people, and Obama's playing well enough to put Vishwanathan Anand (current World Chess Champ) to shame. Every time he reaches out, the Rethugs MUST retreat into an unreasonable position or risk being seen as weak by their shrinking base. He has them in a bind of their own making, where every move they make weakens them further with the larger electorate. If this continues, the Democrats will have a deathgrip on the Government for YEARS. Or to be more musical about it, Obama's playing the GOP like Jimi Hendrix on a Fender Stratocaster."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC