Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Obama blow his honeymoon during the transition?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Cato the Younger Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:08 AM
Original message
Did Obama blow his honeymoon during the transition?
Okay, first of all this is not Obama bashing though some will accuse me of doing just that. But am I the only person who thinks that Obama blew most of his honeymoon during the transition when he couldn't do much?

There was much talk about how the transition team was reading up on FDR's first 100 days but they should have paid attention to what FDR did during the period of November 1932 to March 1933. The highlight of what FDR and Louis Howe did was to not say a word, keep their cards up to their chest and let Hoover continue his destructive policies on the country. Was it cruel? Yes, it was vicious but politically necessary for FDR. He could not allow himself to be tied to anything the outgoing administration did. Should those policies fail FDR would be tied to those failures and should they manage to work, the Republicans would claim a victory.

No, 2008 is not 1932, first off we don't have 25% or more of the nation dumpster diving for dinner and in 1932 there was a real chance of armed uprising. But Obama by working with the Bush Administration, no matter how slight, is going to be tainted by the remaining TARP funding and other feeble efforts Bush did to "help" the economy. I am sure that reaching out for bipartisanship is wonderful but hasn't bipartisanship been likened to date rape?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost in CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Um NO... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. He never got a honeymoon - Bush had been out of commission for nearly 6 months
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. President Obama's first 100 days began on November 6, not January 21.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. he blew the honeymoon with me when he started appointing people
responsible for this mess, to fix it. However, I realize that I don't quite yet understand the method of his madness, So I'll refrain from making any judgments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. Emphatically NO
He passed the stimulus plan. It's a huge victory.

rugman can cry all he wants that it's not large enough, but it's $789 billion. The Marshall Plan was about $130 billion in today's dollars. The entire New Deal cost $500 billion.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. No
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. he had NO honeymoon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
10. The man has a damn near 70% approval rating
think about that and then, what do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. There was NEVER going to be a honeymoon.
Didn't matter which Dem got the job, the Republicans never intended to cooperate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. I'm concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veritas_et_Aequitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
13. No honeymoon, sir.
Also, I like your name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
14. No--he never had a honeymoon and the trial by fire began on Election Day. CATO? Hmmm... nt
Edited on Mon Feb-16-09 09:55 AM by blondeatlast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
15. The Transition Continues...
Sheesh...sounds like copy right out of the corporate media, dictated by some right wing harpie.

Or someone who was hoping the world would turn on a dime on January 20th...every little ill wasn't cured overnight. The outrage I tell ya.

No, this isn't 1932...in many ways it could be worse. Not only do we have rising unemployment (consider this 1930...by 1933, Hoover had screwed things so bad it made the depression worse...a saving grace is the markets collapsed on booooshie in his last months, imagine how much worse had this been had it occured in 2005 :shiver:) but also two wars that are draining resources that should have been used here at home. There are fires everywhere...and people are expecting everything to change overnight? Please!

There's a part of transition that is known as continuity. We've seen administrations where everyone was tossed out and it took months for things to move smoothly...and those were in "good" times. We don't have such a luxuary here. President Obama will be spending the first year, if not longer, in fixing the messes of the past 8 years...and there are few easy choices. Also, anyone and everyone who can help in this goal...who cares what party...is very needed.

Those who obstruct, that's another issue. Many were the cause for the mess we're in, I'm surely not gonna pay any attention to what they say...or those on the other side who want Christmas yesterday and play Monday morning quarterback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC