Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Air Force Brass Must Crack Down on Obama Picture Removal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 07:46 PM
Original message
Air Force Brass Must Crack Down on Obama Picture Removal
Edited on Mon Feb-16-09 07:50 PM by babylonsister
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/earl-ofari-hutchinson/air-force-brass-must-crac_b_167417.html


Earl Ofari Hutchinson
Political Analyst and Social Issues Commentator
Posted February 16, 2009 | 06:56 PM (EST)

Air Force Brass Must Crack Down on Obama Picture Removal


Apparently Colonel Jay Raymond Commander of the flagship Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado Springs, Colorado, didn't get the word. Barack Obama is the 44th President of the United States. He's also the Commander in Chief of the armed forces. The failure to get the word was apparent when Raymond did not instantly reprimand Peterson commissary employees for abruptly yanking Obama's picture from the commissary entrance.

The employees claimed that the picture of Obama didn't fit in with the theme and the tradition of Presidents Day. That only presidents Washington and Lincoln should be honored on that day; meaning that their pictures are the only presidential pictures that should be seen. This lame excuse won't wash.

Obama is the current President and before him Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton, and probably the faces of Bush Sr. and Ronald Reagan smiled benignly down on commissary visitors and patrons on Presidents Day. There is no record anyone protested that their pictures were not in keeping with the spirit of the day.

The Obama picture flap is not a petty, silly, and small thing. It's part of the relentless low intensity campaign that has been waged by some bloggers, on some web sites, and by some conservative talk radio hosts to belittle, demean and discredit the nation's first African-American president. Secretary of the Air Force Michael B. Donley and Peterson Air Base Commander Jay Raymond should call the picture removal the bigoted act that it is.

They should do what any good military commander does when there's insubordination and disrespect in the ranks and that's crack down. That means an immediate order to place Obama's picture back on the wall, and sternly warn that this is an order and disobedience will be punished.

Secretary Donley should also send a message to Air Force personnel at all bases that President Obama is the nation's commander in chief. His picture will be on full display at the bases and fully respected.

Related thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5067117
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. All officers involved should be stripped of all rank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retired AF Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. What officers?
The Store Director is a civilian, the Store Administrator is a civilian, the front end manager is a civilian, the grocery, produce and meat dept managers are civilian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wolfgangmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
93. Good Point
They are civilians so fire their asses.

There are plenty of well qualified patriotic americans who could use that job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retired AF Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #93
98. Yes the old we don't know the whole story but lets ruin
Edited on Tue Feb-17-09 08:49 PM by Retired AF Dem
someones life. Of course the most famous case on DU was when that judges husband was killed a few years ago. All the screaming banshees yelling and screaming, white supremacist's did it, find them hunt them down kill them all. In the end scumbag white supremacists had nothing to do with it. Any apologies from the screaming banshees? Of course not. Nut cases all. Please if you ever get picked for jury duty do your best to get out of it and do our justice system a favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FightingIrish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. My son works for a federal agency
Someone couldn't wait until January 20 to replace the presidential portrait. They pasted an Obama portrait over the face of the goofy guy that was already hanging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
remoulade Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. And that was perfectly acceptable because
uh, why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. because the goofy guy was a criminal that caused thousands of deaths?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
remoulade Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. He was the president (unfortunately) up until 1-20. Only a juvenile ass would deny that.
Sorry, I'm fed up with double standards and hypocrisy no matter who the guilty parties are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Some people would argue he wasn't really the elected president
but....whatever. I see your point and you are correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
remoulade Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I'm a little conflicted here. I'm not at all convinced Bush was honestly elected
but he ended up living in the White House and so I sucked it up, mostly, and accepted it. And obviously I disagree with the wingnuts who claim
Obama is somehow illegitimate (the birth certificate thing is particularly galling)...and so there it is - we don't have to like reality to believe it.
:D

Thank ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
51. So you're one of those who believe Obama isn't an American citizen?
Sweet. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whopis01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. how did you determine that from his post? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #52
63. Whoops, I misread.
The line breaks threw me off. Sorry about that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
85. I didn't suck it up.
Our country was in the hands of a hostile regime for eight years. They subverted the Constitution, which is supposed to be our Guardian.

The way I read my rights to citizenship, anyone who disregards the legal document is, in a word, illegitimate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
100. So, you knew he was a War Criminal, and not legitimately elected
Edited on Tue Feb-17-09 10:51 PM by TheWatcher
But you decided to suck it up and accept it?

And we wonder why we end up with the Government we deserve.

I wonder what things would have been like if John Adams, Jefferson & Co. would have just "sucked up and accepted" everything back then.

But then again, I guess all this "By The People, For The People" stuff is antiquated, outdated, and quaint, anyway.

Besides, now that he's gone, we should just forget about all that bad stuff and never hold him or any of his cabinet accountable for their crimes and atrocities.

We'll just suck up and accept it!

But heaven help ANY government official if they get a blow job. We'll show THEM what Rule Of Law means, by God!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. they did not take LBJs picture down, even thought he got
36,000 Americans killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
66. Because the goofy looking guy was NEVER legally elected. He should have been impeached instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
103. Booshe WASN'T President any more, that's why, you got a problem with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wizstars Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
88. man, you got my hopes up for a second there...
...when you talked about "that goofy guy hanging".....

Wishful thinking on my part.... :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Beyond the racist underpinnings, it is a subversive act of treason.
For a military facility to remove the presidents picture is truly astounding. These people should be disciplined asap in the harshest manner possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GA_ArmyVet Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. It is not treason
As listed below in the legal description of treason, it hardly rises to that level, but it is disrespectful, and should not be condoned.

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 115 § 2381 Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.


UCMJ SECTION 904. ART. 104. AIDING THE ENEMY

Any person who--

(1) aids, or attempts to aid, the enemy with arms, ammunition, supplies, money, or other things; or

(2) without proper authority, knowingly harbors or protects or gives intelligence to or communicates or corresponds with or holds any intercourse with the enemy, either directly or indirectly; shall suffer death or such other punishment as a court-martial or military commission may direct.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Well, if you put it that way. But if one could make the argument that whoever
took the picture down, took it down at the request of an enemy of the United States (define enemy as you will) to give them aid and comfort, one could call it treason.

As for the death penalty, even I come up a little short on that one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Of course you'd have to prove that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Of course. No witch burnings here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. And you actually think a jury is going to convict someone of treason for asking for a photo....
to be removed. I'm guessing some jerk retiree bullied some Privates wife who was working as a cashier and she listened to the retired First Sergeant and took the photo down. Pretty despicable but not treason.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. That's the kind of logic freeper types used to claim that anyone who
posted at DU in the last 8 years committed treason. After all, some posts on DU were critical of the president, who was the CiC, and criticizing the CiC could embolden our enemies and dishearten our troops.

Treason, socialism, and fascism are IMO the three most overused and misunderstood words in the blogosphere these days...

(And I'm speaking generally here, not specifically about your posts - I understand that you're conversating, not advocating. :))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
84. How about Outing a Covert CIA Agent that worked on nuclear proliferation?
Would that be considered TREASON in your estimate. I can not think of anything in this current "War on Terror" that would aid the "enemy" more than taking a Covert Agent off a years long trail of nuclear material and destroying a sizable network that had been in place for years..If one is guilty of TREASON I see no reason their picture should be exalted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GA_ArmyVet Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #84
89. Whole different scenario, and one that I am infinitely
unqualified to make a legal guess. However since I am already donning my pseudo lawyer hat...I would say it would depend on how you framed it to the judge and jury. One could definitely make the case, it is however an intent crime meaning that to prove guilt you have to prove intent (you can not accidentally commit treason). So in order to prove treason, you have to prove their actions not only aided the enemy, but that was the intent of the action. Otherwise Geraldo could be charge with treason when he gave troop positions while he was embedded, obviously gave aid to the enemy, but I think it would hard to prove his intent was to do that, in fact I believe he was just not thinking of the implications of his actions. I am not saying the same is true with the outing of Plame, just that you would have to prove it done with the intent ot aid, not just that it aided the enemy.

Damn, that was more legal opinion than I have any business making, my apologies to the the lawyers here. Time for me to quit practicing law without a license.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
remoulade Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. You're just shitting us, right?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Based on the definition of treason given above, I do not "shit" you.
Edited on Mon Feb-16-09 09:03 PM by geckosfeet
Treason is treason. Big or small.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
remoulade Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Bullshit. Treason is concisely defined. Your attaching the charge to a petty bit of racism
does neither you nor Democrats any favors.
\
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. It seems fairly broadly defined to me. "Aid and comfort" is wide open.
It could be simple racism.

It could be something more sinister.

Have a nice fucking day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
101. Yes, and the guy you "sucked up and accepted" committed plenty of it.
Edited on Tue Feb-17-09 10:55 PM by TheWatcher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. You realize that commissary employees usually aren't members of the military, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Navy Exchanges have civilian managers, but there is still a military CO
I assume commissaries have a similar chain of command? On a base = under military command? At least it used to mean that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. They have said that commissary employees took the photo down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. yes, but isn't there a bit of military brass in charge at some level?
I know dipshit racists are too many and not far enough between, but these employee answer to SOMEBODY, and on a base, eventually that somebody up the chain is military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #34
43. I'm sure at some level there is. Just not sure they're going to fire some cashier for listening...
to someone who said they were important and that it needed to be taken down. They'll probably have a training class.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hangingon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #34
50. I think that commissaries are part of AAFES.
Edited on Tue Feb-17-09 11:42 AM by Hangingon
AAFES (Army Air Force Exchange Service) is a NAF (non-appropriated fund) organization which is headed by a 2 star. I don't think the picture situation rises to the level of treason. Some disciplinary action may be warranted. AAFES should look into the situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Best_man23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #31
82. They have civilian managers
But they still answer to military command, since most Exchanges and PX are on base grounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiranon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #26
38. They can still be terminated and should be over this incident.
Removing the President's picture is unacceptable behavior by the commissary employee(s). I used to work on a general's staff and the military head for the commissary was once called in and asked to institute a change in commissary policy world wide and it was done with the stroke of a pen by that general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. I agree. I just don't think the responsible parrty should be charged with treason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whopis01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #38
54. Bullshit
The picture of Obama was on a sign advertising Presidents' Day. They didn't remove the President's picture from the sign, they took down the entire sign. A sign which was inappropriate to begin with as there is no federal holiday names "Presidents' Day", nor does Colorado recognize it as a state holiday. And the federal holiday is designed to recognize Washington - not Washington and Lincoln and all the other Presidents.

They actually replaced the sign with another, more appropriate sign titled "Washington's Birthday".

Was at least one customer complaining about the picture a dipshit racist? Did he want the picture removed because he didn't want to shop at place with a picture of a black man? Is this guy an idiotic asshole who should be barred from stepping foot in that store? Yes to all the above. But to suggest that someone should lose their job over removing a sign that was arguably inappropriate is ridiculous.

I realize that in past years they used pictures of other Presidents when they should not have and no one complained. And I realize that at least some of the complainers were motivated by racism. But as much as it guiles me to see them get anything they wanted, they have a valid point here and certainly no one should lose their job for doing what is appropriate for a federal holiday.


http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/39871


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #38
69. I disagree so much! Its just a picture. Sure, the picture should be hung back up if its
customary that the presidential portrait is displayed in a commissary. Sure, its a politically motivated move to take it down.
Still, claims of this being treason, that people should be fired or kicked out of the military, are pretty fascist. Obama is the president, with or without a photo hanging up in some commissary. We don't need his image being displayed as a means to maintain power. We have rule of law and the Constitution to do that.

I think that if the stories about General Petraeus defying Obama's instructions about withdrawal from Iraq are true, then that is closer to treason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GA_ArmyVet Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
95. Yes, I know
The treason section is from US Criminal Code.

Aiding the enemy, I got from the UCMJ as it was the first one I found, however, the UCMJ is also part of the US Criminal Code and is very similar for everything except purely military offenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
45. I don't think Obama believes
"L'Etat, c'est moi!"

He is not the US, and disrespect toward him, while obnoxious, is certainly not treason and not a threat to US Security.

If it were, we would all be on trial for disrespecting the asshat who occupied the WH previously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whopis01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
57. It is not treason by any stretch of the imagination
This was a poster advertising "Presidents' Day". Not an official picture of the Commander-in-Chief being displayed at a federal facility.

It was probably inappropriate to have the poster up at all as "Presidents' Day" is not a federal holiday, nor is it a state holiday in Colorado. What would have been more appropriate would be a poster for "Washington's Birthday" - which is exactly what they replaced it with.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GA_ArmyVet Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #57
96. Advertisements in general should not be posted in the
Edited on Tue Feb-17-09 07:40 PM by GA_ArmyVet
Commissary. However, Presidents Day is a holiday, at least on Military bases and Government Offices. I assume so anyway, I got the day off work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whopis01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #96
99. You got Washington's Birthday off - not President's day
Some states have a holiday called "President's Day" - and place it on the same day as Washington's Birthday - but it is not a federal holiday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Tell it like it is
and then make sure that an order is made--and obeyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Some people seem to view the military as an arm of the Republican Party
and they need to be reminded of the official political neutrality of the armed forces. I don't give 2 shits how any of them vote in the privacy of the voting booth.

The election is over, and Obama won.

They must be told without equivocation "Obama is your commander in chief. Bitches!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. i agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GA_ArmyVet Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah, I have to agree thats not right
It is posted in the Pentagon where I work, but not at all the bases yet...sometimes it takes a bit to get official photos distributed and mounted.

As an aside, I have not seen any disrespectful actions by anyone at working around me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ms liberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I'm glad to hear that...
Welcome to DU, GA_ArmyVet, and Thank you for your service!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GA_ArmyVet Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Thank you
Glad to be here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. You know, it's really apparent...
That our military is dysfunctional. One needs only look at their yearly budgets to see that. But the pacesetters have to be The Air Farce. Whenever there is one of these stunning stories, it's generally The Air Farce and it's generally got the word "Colorado Springs" somewhere in the story.

Sooner or later, preferably sooner, we are gonna have to get a real prick in there at either SECDEF or SECAF to clean out the Dobsonian elements that have taken it over, root and branch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. Watched a very interesting documentary recently
called "Constantine's Sword" that examined just what you are talking about with regards to the link between the US military and the Christian right and anti-Semitism at the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs. It's time to for President Obama to have his MacArthur moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
remoulade Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's a petty, silly and small thing that feeds people who live to find things to be offended over.
I would give you odds that President Obama would laugh in the face of anybody who got their undies in a twist over a picture on the window of a fucking grocery store. Oh wait, maybe he isn't capable to defend himself...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #12
40. Maybe a small issue, but not petty. Barack Obama is the Commander in Chief
and these knuckle-dragging, uneducated, half-wit, racist bigots need to remember that.

They are a shame to our country, the flag and the Constitution of the United States.

President Obama can defend himself just fine. He already handed the "Just Say No" useless do-nothing GOP their asses this past week.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiranon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #12
41. Next, someone will say "Can't you take a joke?" It's "Yes, Sir; No, Sir; No Excuses, Sir." Skip
all the rest. The behavior was unacceptable and a sitting President ignores it at his peril as it indicates that the employees who are low level personnel must believe that the top echelon believes the same way or they would never have done it. In the military, everything is from the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
86. Did you read the whole story previously?
Apparently the cashier said the 'customer' who complained said the following...

"He said they're not going to have no black man on the window where he shops," the cashier said.

Still petty, silly, and small? At first read I thought it was silly because technically I believe Presidents day only honors dead presidents. But when I read that, it changed my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hotler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. Colorado Springs home of the
Right-wing flight-wing of our military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
28. Jesus look at all those hearts
you vixen you :spank:

This is AFA bullcrap. They have a coven of fundies out there in the thin air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #28
37. I couldn't be more embarrassed that this happened here.
I knew they were racist, fundie assholes, but this takes the cake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiranon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
36. They need a stand down at Colorado Springs and those who do not support
the Commander in Chief need to be dismissed whether they are civilian or military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
42. My SO is retired AF and was outraged to read about the picture removal.
It's not so much the fact patrons of the commissary were complaining - it's that the staff actually gave in and took the picture down. Something needs to be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
44. When Clinton was president, members of the various branches of the
Edited on Tue Feb-17-09 09:57 AM by tblue37
Armed Forces were openly disrespectful and encouraged by Republicans to be so--and no one was ever punished or even warned for it.

When W was president, any member of the armed force who dared to express even mild displeasure was instantly reprimanded and threatened. Now they are doing to Obama what they did to Clinton. This needs to be nipped in the bud. I do fear sometimes that because Obama is easy-going, he will let people get away with too much crap, and by the time he realizes he shouldn't, it will be too late to roll back the disrespect.

I thought W was an ass when he snapped at a reporter who called him "sir" instead of "Mr. President." (I still think so, since "sir" is suitably respectful, but Bush was the sort of guy who actually had the rpesidential seal stamped onto his socks!). But I would love to see the WH push back immediately at reporters and pundits who call him "Obama" or "Mr. Obama" instead of "President Obama."

And I would love to see this commissary crap slapped down hard, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #44
53. In all fairness, I have yet to see a reporter call the President "Mr. Obama" when speaking to him
directly.

I can tell you though that it is in both the AP and Chicago style guides (the bibles of copy rules in journalism) that in the first reference to the President you use "President Obama" and in the folllowing references you use either "Mr. Obama" or "the President."

I know the "Mr." thing upsets some on DU. It is simply the rules of the way it has been done throughout modern times. There is ZERO disrespect intended or implied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Castleman Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #44
83. Openly disrespectful?
How about threatening the President? When that jackoff Jesse Helms said that Clinton had better watch himself and not to "come to any bases in North Carolina", I thought the assclown should have been hung by his toes for threatening the President. As much as I appreciate Obama being cool with all the crap, I think a forceful lesson or two about respecting the man and his office is in order. If the general or what-have-you in charge is busted back to buck private, the rest will get the message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
46. Letters to the Editor in the Colorado Springs Gazette this morning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
47. If the photo of the current President always hangs there, as it does
in many military facilities, and the employees took it down, they should be reprimanded and the photo returned. If someone who worked there just liked Obama and decided to post his photo in the entryway for President's Day, I can sort of understand why Freep types would whine that "he's not Washington or Lincoln"--because I sure as hell felt that way about the Chimpster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #47
55. What a bunch of loonies
Since when does President's day only honor Washington and Liconln? I have NEVER heard that before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdab1973 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #47
59. It wasn't...
This was not over the display of the chain of command photos that are prominently displayed in each unit's headquarters building.

This was a DeCA (Defense Commissary Activity) advertising display at the Peterson AFB commissary for a President's Day sale. The local Air Force squadron does not directly oversee or have any command jurisdiction over the commissary...DeCA does.

All these howls to have the local Air Force officers stripped of rank of charged with treason are simply hyped up rhetoric from a bunch of people that don't know the facts.

DeCA will have to look into the matter to determine if there was any undue racial or political undertones in this incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
48. They HAD to take it down
People were touching it and getting healed.

:)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
49. Just to be clear...
Apparently this was not the actual chain of command photos (Military personnel know what I am talking about) but rather a promotion for the holiday sale or promotion.

I didn't think it was clear from some of the comments that followed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
56. "The employees claimed that the picture of Obama didn't fit in..."
The picture. Presumably, Obama is wearing the wrong kind of tie--because I certainly can't think of any other reason why they might think Obama doesn't look right. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
58. Kicked and recommended, that commander should at the very least be reprimanded.
Thanks for the thread, babylonsister.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdab1973 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. For what?
The two wing commanders at Peterson are for Air Force Space Command's 21st Space Wing and the AF Reserve's 302nd Airlift Wing. Neither unit (nor the AF Space Command Headquarters) has any administrative or command authority over the commissary. The commissary is run by an independent DoD agency called DeCA (Defense Commissary Activity). DeCA has their own chain of command, and it's independent of any branch of service. The employees at each commissary are all federal government civil service workers that work for DeCA, not the USAF. So even if they did something wrong, the local base or wing commanders have no authority to discipline them over this issue.

There is a general officer that has oversight of DeCA at the DoD level. But by and large, the military has no local presence at commissaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #60
64. If DeCa is an independent
DoD agency that still puts them under the Department of Defense and their own chain of command still runs through the Presidency.

If the military commander has no authority over them, the Secretary of Defense does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdab1973 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #64
67. That is true...however you are missing my point...
you are calling for the heads of the USAF commanders at that base. They have no authority over the commissary. It's a bit like you getting fired for something someone in the company next door did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. Maybe my second post wasn't clear,
if the military commander has no authority over them, then DeCa still answers to the Secretary of Defense and as such whoever runs DeCa at that installation should be held accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdab1973 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #68
71. The person who runs DeCA at that installation is likely civilian...
And I would really wait to see where the facts fall. It seems the different versions of this incident fall all over the place. If something was determined to have been done wrong, then hold someone accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #71
74. I agree with the thrust of your post,
but I believe even if he/she is a civilian and he/she answers to the Secretary of Defense, that puts them under the chain of command, making the President their Commander in Chief as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdab1973 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. That is true, but this isn't about the commissary denying he's the CinC
It was a "President's Day" ad that featured Obama, and some customers objected to a sitting president being featured as the subject of President's Day (and they are technically correct, although I wouldn't have cared one way or the other). So commissary workers removed the sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. I would like to know the history of recent previous President Day
traditions at this commissary to study for consistency sake.

Maybe I'm mistaken regarding President's Day, but it was my understanding this was expanded to recognize and include all Presidents, including current ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retired AF Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #68
105. News flash for Uncle Joe
It was a sales banner. It would have been taken down at the end of the day. It ended up being taken down a few hours earlier. The only fault I find with DeCA is every once in awhile you just have to tell cry baby customers to fuck off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
61. Agreed, but jumping on the race card isn't gonna do us any favors. How bout the argument...
that he's the President, and it's President's Day, so put his picture up? How hard is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
62. Of all the military branchs, the airforce never gets their hands dirty.
Yah, they'll bomb,bomb, away at anything they want, but do they ever see one drop of blood on their hands???

And where the phuck were they on 911???? Quite frankly, I don't even think they're capable of protecting anyone.

They are the most arrogant and ignorant and disrespectful of all the branches!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdab1973 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. What?
The Air Force has had people die in the two wars. Air Force EOD and Security Forces have lost many people in particular. Aircrews have been lucky, because the insurgents typically do not understand how to effectively use the surface to air missiles they have. I have personally be shot at on several occasions while flying over Iraq. In the first gulf war, a number of pilots were lost, and a couple were lost on the first few days of the current Iraq war.

As for 9/11, the fighter pilots were scrambled as soon as they were told something was going on. What do you expect, that they would have ESP and know when to launch? Give me a break.

There are lots of USAF people that are working very hard on a daily basis in both conflicts. It's been luck in some cases that some of our aircraft weren't brought down...like a rocket going right through the #4 engine of a C-130 and it didn't explode...had it gone off, that crew would have been dead. There are lots of close calls.

Unfortunately, both wars are primarily ground conflicts, as are most insurgencies. So therefore the ground forces absorb most of the casualties. But there are AF casualties as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #62
102. That is one ignorant post...
I like to give the AF a hard time as much as any Army guy but damn... ignorance... phew...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
70. Come on, guys! Its just a picture. It has no special powers.
Obama is the president, with or without a photo hanging up in some commissary. We don't need his image being displayed as a means to maintain power. We have rule of law and the Constitution to do that.

The over reaction seems pretty fascist. No one is committing treason. No one should be fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdab1973 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #70
73. And it was actually an ad...
...for a "President's Day" sale, and someone thought that President's Day should be about past presidents, not the current one. However right or wrong that opinion is, it's really not a big deal, IMHO.

I'm quite sure that the actual "Commander-in-Chief" photos in the military units show Obama, and have not been removed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
72. I was on a Submarine and at sea when Nixon resigned.
We took his picture and turned it face to the wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #72
81. Ha! Nice (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TWiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
77. Time to shoot some Generals .....
Frankly, I am sick and tired of the "hero worship" mantra forced down everyone's throat over the past 8 years. The military is far too big for its britches and needs to be reigned in.

The tension between Mr. Obama and the military began during the inaugeration parade. The Joint Pussies refused to stand with Mr. Obama and only popped in for a second or two to salute their own troops as they walked by.

Fuck the military. I am sick of their "worship me" horse shit simply because they volunteered to kill people and got paid for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajPayne2 Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #77
90. Now that is not a nice thing to say about the military
I am active duty and I supported the President financially and with my vote. Some in the military are rabid anti-Obama types but that is not all of us. To make a blanket statement like that does no one any good and bastardizes those of us who signed up to serve our country rather than "shoot people and get paid for it". I never asked for anyone's worship nor praise. I volunteered for this job and will follow the orders of my CIC regardless of who he or she may be. If you are going to bad-mouth the service of so many for the actions of a few assholes, what does that make you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GA_ArmyVet Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #77
91. Ok I was there at the Inauguration
Edited on Tue Feb-17-09 07:34 PM by GA_ArmyVet
working the inauguration and you could not be more wrong. The Joint Chiefs were exactly where they were supposed to be. They had a bus that took them to their spots. Their roles were assigned by the Presidential Inauguration Committee (PIC) and they went to all the balls and parades and ceremonies they were invited to attend.

I was there and saw the chairman with his wife sitting in the reviewing stand for the entire parade. Some key leaders were not there, because that was their role. The threat level was so high that many people were ordered to be in alternate locations to respond to any threat or emergency that arose.

As far as your other statement, I don't ask to be worshiped, but a bit of mutual respect between human beings is not so much to ask for. I don't degrade you by saying Fuck Burger flippers, Fuck Middle management, or fuck whatever you chose to do. I try to respect you for a human being and your choices.

I have responded to you before though, and I almost always receive a rude response in return, and this leads me to believe you do not wish to engage in polite discussion, but intend to shout rhetoric and hyperbole trying to disrupt open and honest debate and discussion of issues without any explanation, example or proof of your opinions.

That said, I still wish you well and hope one day you will share you insight into the military, politics and share how you came to your enlightened views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernyankeebelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
78. This is bad
My father and father-in-law both retired from military with over 22 yrs. My husband served with 21 yrs. I have worked at military bases for over 20 yrs. I have shopped at the commissary and I have seen the picture of the current president on the wall no matter which president it was. No one has a right to take it down, no one. I didn't like some of those presidents that were hanging on the wall but I respected the position not the person. The Base Commander should be informed and action taken to have the picture put back up. Am white, and I am damn tired of seeing down right racism like this. There are black soldiers all over this country and overseas fighting for our freedoms just like white and other races. Everyone should give them the same respect. Shame of people who don't. This is one issue that I always get pissed about. I don't expect this cramp from the military people. You usually see this stuff with civilians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pasto76 Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
79. This is how republicans "stick it Obama"
despite all the flag waving and last eight years of "cant questions the Chief".....I hate them all, but am astonished at how brazen their hypocrisy is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
80. works for me.... so when do we celebrate BLACK PRESIDENTS DAY ? ? ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
87. I had a picture of Nixon ruining my appetite in boot camp,
and a picture of Ronnie Raygun making me throw up a little in my mouth at the end of my time in the Navy.
I would have welcomed a portrait of President and CinC Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #87
92. I had Carter....
Regan and BushI. I couldn't get out fast enough at the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
94. There must be camera's
So they could probably get the one who took it down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
97. The individual/s involved should be sevely punished for their bad faith
Edited on Tue Feb-17-09 07:56 PM by Joe Chi Minh
and lack of patriotism. Demotion seems appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
104. I wasn't surprised by this in the least...
Co Springs and the Air Force base close to it are a hotbed of religious fanaticism and racial bigotry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC