Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SAMPSON "Plans To Testify FULLY, TRUTHFULLY & PUBLICLY" (Just Out From His Lawyer)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:34 PM
Original message
SAMPSON "Plans To Testify FULLY, TRUTHFULLY & PUBLICLY" (Just Out From His Lawyer)
Sampson: Nothing Can Stop Me Now

By Paul Kiel - March 26, 2007, 6:29 PM

Don't worry, Senate Judiciary Committee. Monica Goodling's choice to take the Fifth notwithstanding, Kyle Sampson will keep that date on Thursday. Just out from his lawyer, Bradford Berenson:

"Kyle plans to testify fully, truthfully, and publicly. Hearings in a highly politicized environment like this can sometimes become a game of gotcha, but Kyle has decided to trust the Congress and the process."

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002881.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am there in front of my TV for this one.
GREAT NEWS. We always needed just ONE Bushie to get sick of taking the fall for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. RUH ROH!
:bounce: I can't wait for Thursday!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. heh heh heh ha HA HAHAHAH HAHAHAH hee hee heh heh. ha
Mi knee-there
Book him danno.
be there, aloha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
35. Please enlightened on Ruh Roh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Brad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. It's a direct quote from Scooby Doo
Just when Scooby and Shaggy realize they are in major trouble, Scooby says, "Ruh-roh". That's apparently dog for "Uh-Oh".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #37
46. I can never remember when to quote Scooby-Doo, and when to quote Astro. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steelyboo Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #46
49. Personally, I think he's taking that quote competely out of context :) NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
39. Let the popcorn flow like wine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, this should be good
but, if I were Mr. Sampson, I'd sleep with one eye open.

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. So Kyle's Warning To WH Has Been Delivered Via His Lawyer
Fat lot of good it did I Liar Libby
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Next one to be missing
just sayin...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. That's the first thing that came to my mind. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hmmm...
Mayhaps Sampson is one pissed-off little repuke, who doesn't feel like being a foil for them.

Let it fly, son. Let it all out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
41. So far
the crime family has been making offers that couldn't be refused. Let's see what gets disclosed in his testimony before celebrating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Great, then congress can ask Sampson what Monica Goodling's role was
...in all of this. That should compel her to be more forth-coming in her testimony instead of claiming that anything she says will incriminate her in the criminal activities of the Bush administration and DoJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Ka-pow
that would be something !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. YES! maybe she'll have the 'need' to DEFEND herself.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
48. Yes, we'll see what comes out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. I Hope To God This Is Shrub's John Dean Moment
John Dean's testimony (to the Senate, I believe) was what blew up Nixon.

Dean was young, and testified fully, truthfully, and publically... BOOM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
28. I'm keeping my fingers crossed that you're right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
32. Nah, we have at least an hour of this movie left...
That would be a premature climax, unless there's a long chase.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. He's going to blame it all on bureaucratic bungling and accept no
personal responsibility. I'm noticing a rethug trend...

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0307/3282.html

Sampson Testimony May Be Key To Case

By: Mike Allen
March 26, 2007 07:33 AM EST

Friends say D. Kyle Sampson, the former chief of staff to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, believes that bureaucratic bungling rather than intentional wrongdoing was at the root of controversy over replacement of eight U.S. attorneys. Officials in both parties say Sampson’s testimony this Thursday before the Senate Judiciary Committee could provide a crucial roadmap to what happened, with Gonzales’ credibility at stake.

After the Justice Department released e-mails on Friday night that appeared to contradict the assertion by Gonzales that he had not been “involved in any discussions” about the firings, Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), a member of the committee, said on Saturday: “The Sampson testimony is now more crucial than ever. He was at the center of it all. He can tell us what the attorney general knew, when he knew it, and what he did about it.”

Sampson’s questioners have e-mail showing that he discussed the replacement of the prosecutors with Gonzales beginning shortly after President Bush’s reelection in 2004. Sampson was also part of a meeting, documented in the e-mails released Friday, that Gonzales attended on the issue shortly before the firings occurred. He can be expected to tell Congress he was more involved in the details than Gonzales was.

Sampson is not gunning for anybody, according to friends. He believes that the issue has blown up because the Justice Department had an inadequate system for preparing officials to testify before Congress, the friends say. The Justice Department officials testified that the firings were based on performance rather than politics, an assertion called into question by e-mails the department later delivered to Capitol Hill.

The friends say Sampson, 37, does not plan to deliver bombshells, and say that Democrats looking for plots and schemes will be disappointed. Like other Republicans, Sampson will contend there was no underlying sin, just a botched response.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. He can "contend" and "toe the party line" all he wants but he still is >
under oath and has to take questions.

On the other hand, maybe he's saying all that ahead of time to keep the goons away for a few days. }(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
36. That's what I thought..
.... they're going to send him in hoping he can defuse this mess.

I sure hope he doesn't tell any lies because that would be most unfortunate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. Stay off small planes, Mr. Sampson
And don't accept any hunting trip offers from Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. theres stories from his friends that he's not about to
do anything except the party line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Bullshit....look at this about Berenson:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/3/19/12148/2763

Well, three prominent speakers were introduced by prominent neocon David Frum at an American Enterprise Institute (AEI) meeting on April 26, 2004. They were Bradford Berenson, Richard Klingler, and Adam Charnes -- the first two were described as leaders or founders of CCD, while Charnes is described as their counsel. Frum calls Berenson and Klingler his "friends".

Political savvy readers should recognize some of these names. Berenson, for instance, is the current attorney for key U.S. attorney scandal figure Kyle Sampson!!

Klingler is a recently appointed Senior Associate Counsel to President Bush!

Charnes is a former Principal Deputy District Attorney General at the Department of Justice, also said to work in the Office of Legal Affairs there. Charnes is also described as a protege of John Roberts while Charnes was at the law firm of Hogan & Hartson.

Bradford Berenson: this guy is Everywhere!

So, to recap. Moschella calls Collins about changing the Patriot Act provision on how interim U.S. attorneys are appointed. Moschella believes leaving such appointments to judges is too political (see my last diary). He then also leaves out Congressional approval when drafting that portion of the law. Collins says he doesn't understand how that happened.

Collins is linked to CCD, presenting an amicus curiae to the Supreme Court re Hamdan on CCD's behalf. CCD is led by former and current White House Counsels.

Former? Well, Bradford Berenson was Associate White House Counsel from Jan. 2001 to Jan. 2003. He was an associate counsel to Alberto Gonzales. This member of the Federalist Society now works as an attorney at Sidley Austin Brown & Wood:

After serving as associate White House counsel under President George W. Bush, Bradford A. Berenson has rejoined the Washington office of Sidley Austin Brown & Wood as a partner. He will divide his time between the firm’s white collar and appellate litigation groups, where he practiced before being appointed by the president in January 2001. During his two-year tenure in the White House, he handled a variety of legal, legislative and policy issues associated with the Administration’s initiatives with Congress, domestic issues, and the war on terrorism.

At the White House, Mr. Berenson’s responsibilities included work on judicial selection, executive privilege, and responses to congressional oversight efforts. In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, he played a significant role in the executive branch’s counterterrorism response. He worked on the USA Patriot Act, the military order authorizing the use of military commissions, detainee policy and anti-terrorism litigation, presidential action against terrorist financing, and the restructuring of the federal government to create a new Department of Homeland Security.

Oh, yes, and besides being the current attorney for Kyle Sampson, Berenson was also the attorney for Rove aide Susan Ralston, implicated in the Abramoff scandal.


But before all this, according to a Jane Meyer piece at the New Yorker, Berenson was a close associate of David Addington, now Cheney's chief of staff. He also helped draft the original Military Commissions executive order!

On November 13, 2001, an executive order setting up the military commissions was issued under Bush's signature. The decision stunned Powell; the national-security adviser, Condoleezza Rice; the highest-ranking lawyer at the C.I.A.; and many judge advocate generals, or JAGs, the top lawyers in the military services. None of them had been consulted. Michael Chertoff... was also bypassed.... According to multiple sources, Addington secretly usurped the process. He and a few hand-picked associates, including Bradford Berenson and Timothy Flanigan, a lawyer in the White House counsel's office, wrote the executive order creating the commissions.

SourceWatch has also plenty to say about Mr. Berenson. And I note they also call CCD a "shadowy group".

Bradford A. Berenson is one of the original eight associate counsels during Alberto Gonzales's tenure as White House counsel, that was described in a Washington Post 2005.01.02 article titled, Gonzales Helped Set the Course for Detainees, as being comprised of:

a tightknit group of Washington-based former clerks to Supreme Court or appellate judges, all of whom had worked on at least one of three touchstones of the conservative movement: the Whitewater and Monica S. Lewinsky inquiries of former president Bill Clinton, the Bush-Cheney election campaign, and the Florida vote-counting dispute.

This group of associate counsels exerted a great deal of control in the creation of the Patriot Bill, Gonzales' determinations regarding the legal statures of "detainees" captured in the War on Terrorism, the validity of the Geneva Conventions, and a new less stringent legal definition of torture.

Quite a club, eh?

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/3/19/12148/2763
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. IF ANYTHING IS PROOF THAT CHENEY IS RUNNING THE COUNTRY, THIS IS.IT!
Edited on Mon Mar-26-07 07:05 PM by higher class
This lawyer worked on the theft of the election in 2000 and then he worked on covering up the cheating results (with the help of the Boards of Directors of the newspapers who did their dirty part).

We're not going to get anything out of Bramson. That lawyer is there to protect Cheney #1, Bush #2, and Gonzales #3.

Bungling, indeed.

Do you feel the wool coming down over your eyes?

It appears he may have also been on the team to set up the torture parameters? What else could they mean by 'military commissions' that startled the top rungs of operatives.

It's becoming more obvious that the pretend game that put Cheney in there to run things with a maleable mind who only needed a certain number of perks and rewards to get out their and fundraise and play-act providing he (George) also had his own team around him.

I'm sure the Cheney team is disgusted with the Bush team - Miers, Gonzales, and Rice. It's obvious that this is who they think bungled and now they have to have hidden faces out front.

This is going to be a MEET THY ENEMY Thursday.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. (not sure how this relates to Sampson's testimony). . . . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
20. Brad Berenson's bio intell ties and knows about Abramoff/CIA/GOP$ ???
Edited on Mon Mar-26-07 07:11 PM by EVDebs
http://www.sidley.com/news/pub.asp?PubID=17153282003

Looks like they wanted to institute REX84 and the dissenter detention camps on an expedited basis. Maybe Berenson himself could be asked to testify ... he was formerly in the White House Counsel's office himself !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kyle Sampson can fill in all the blanks where Monic Goodling is scared shitless to talk
...and then Monica can go to Federal Prison taking the 5th!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
22. Wow! You mean he's going to do the right thing? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I live in skeptic land
he threw that out there to get "the deal" from the WH is my guess.

I do not trust ANY of them to do the right thing...weasels all of them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. uh, did we expect him to say he's going to LIE?
not trying to be skeptical but don't they always say they're going to tell the truth? I'd bet Libby's lawyer has said the same thing.

notwithstanding, let's hope SOMEONE, ANYONE, starts telling the truth, and soon! that would be great!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
25. Yeah. Right. Put the republic POS under oath. The American people
deserve the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. He's better have 24 hour security
for the rest of his life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
27. To paraphrase Mary McCarthy,
Every word will be a lie, including "and" and "the."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
29. Yeah, Well, We'll See, I Won't Just Take His Word On It
I hope so, but this could just be his lawyer spinning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kohodog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
30. And who butters his bread?
Who is prepping him? Rove or some underling?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
31. This could be redundant but good!
:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. i have no doubt
That if the perfect questions comes up, he'd plead the 5th.

This is all about the questions.

I found the questions in the Plame hearings to be very very good.

Maybe Josh Marshall can send some questions over to Leahy & Schumer, since he's the expert.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Johnny Questions please. Just the facts.
This almost to easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. Berenson, Sampson's lawyer, used to be in * WH Counsel office
So, shouldn't Congress be also questioning HIM ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
38. A republican will testify truthfully??
Cue Mike Malloy's giggling like a loon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
19jet54 Donating Member (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
40. I won't hold my breath...
... but will wait for comment here until after Thursday!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
43. The three options
He's had it up to here with Bush and is willing to lose it all to get rid of him...

or he's the designated fall guy...

or Conyers set him up with a place to run to after the testimony's finished.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. It's probably more important that they keep him hidden BEFORE his testimony
once what he has to say is public, he'll be a little safer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
45. When???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
47. I hope he's in an undisclosed location until then.
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 01:00 PM by Jack Rabbit
I'm not one to think there's anything mysterious about a light plane going down in freezing rain, but the stakes are higher than a single election this time.

Stay safe, Mr. Sampson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
50. this testimony will tomorrow, the clock is ticking for gonzo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC