Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Charges Against Stanford a Long Time Coming, Offshore Banking Experts Say

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 02:47 PM
Original message
Charges Against Stanford a Long Time Coming, Offshore Banking Experts Say

Charges Against Stanford a Long Time Coming, Offshore Banking Experts Say
Accused Financier Under Federal Drug Investigation
By JUSTIN ROOD and BRIAN ROSS
February 19, 2009


Offshore banking experts say that the fraud charges this week against accused financial scammer R. Allen Stanford have been a long time coming.

"There's no surprise at all," said Washington lawyer and IRS consultant Jack Blum. "This man has been on law enforcement's radar screen for the better part of 10 years."

But the SEC didn't move forward until this week, after two former Stanford Financial whistleblowers filed an alleged lawsuit, which revealed how the bank lied about too-good-to-be-true certificates of deposit.

"The problem was the published returns that many advisors use to present to clients and prospects," said former Stanford Group employee Mark Tidwell, "that now we knew that information was incorrect."

"They would lie about it and that behavior just became more and more prevalent," said Charles Well, the other former Stanford Group employee.

more...

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=6907429&page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. "This man has been on law enforcement's radar screen for the better part of 10 years."
Why am I not surprised...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I heard lots of rumors since 2006
from impeccable sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Allen Stanford Forfeited $3 Million In Drug Money In 1999
http://www.businessinsider.com/allen-stanford-forced-to-forfeit-3-million-in-drug-money-in-1999-2009-2
<snip>
There's been a lot of chatter about what, if any, role drugs played in building Allan Stanford's wealth. We know that he managed money for wealthy clients in Latin America, so was he managing money for drug dealer? Ha, do you even have to ask? In 1999 his bank forfeited $3 million worth of drug money to US and Antiguan authorities:

LA Times: In the Antiguan case, however, Tinsley and U.S. officials in Miami credit Texas-born banker R. Allen Stanford, who heads the Houston-based Stanford Financial Group, for taking a lead role in what the Antiguan government insists is a continuing effort to clean up the reputation of the island nation’s offshore banking industry.

His decision to hand over the Carrillo money, they say, was made all the more difficult by the delicate balance these islands and their bankers must maintain in an industry that most Caribbean nations see as a key to the diversification–and survival–of their economies, which rely on tourism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Folks at SEC knew about him and Madoff for at least 8 years or more
but did nothing. Who knew and how did they benefit from not enforcing the law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. On the contrary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katanalori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. FBI JUST PICKED UP STANFORD n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yep great news n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Your question is spot on.
It's why in all these scams, we will be uncovering a web of perps, both institutional and individual. These guys are just the appetizers unless they just decide it's too big to out all of those involved.

It's gonna get REAL ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC