Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just who are all these "responsible" homeowners, anyway?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:45 PM
Original message
Just who are all these "responsible" homeowners, anyway?
Those smugly pointificating here that they busted their ass to make their house payments, somehow implying that there is something lazy or greedy about those in trouble because of these troubled times, do read on:


======


President Obama's housing plan is designed to save "responsible" homeowners from foreclosure by having taxpayers subsidize their mortgage payments.

The problem is, how do you define "responsible?"

In his speech, Obama said his plan "will not help speculators who took risky bets on a rising market and bought homes not to live in but to sell. And it will not reward folks who bought homes they knew from the beginning they would never be able to afford."

It should be fairly easy to identify speculators who bought homes to rent or flip. But how do you prove someone bought a home they knew they couldn't afford?

I've spoken with many people who can't pay their mortgages and are desperate for help. All bought homes they thought they could afford and in many cases really could afford.

Most got into trouble by refinancing their homes - often more than once - and extracting every possible dollar of equity. The money went toward granite countertops, stainless steel appliances, credit cards, student loans, vacations, weddings, cars, etc. Then came a job loss or a divorce or the roommate moved out, and suddenly they couldn't make the payment. They tried to sell or refinance but couldn't because the home's value had dropped below the loan balance.

Responsible or reckless? Who's to say?

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/02/19/BUR1160C69.DTL&type=printable

:applause:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. How many of them could have afforded the joint before they lost jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If someone says they need help, I can only take them at their word.
I would far rather bail out my neighbor than another investment firm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Damn straight!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Word. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. Right on!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. "taxpayers subsidize their mortgage payments" I fail to see where that's the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. In this case, a rising tide raises all the boats. I'm a so-called "responsible"
homeowner (traditional fixed rate/big down payment) and when the next door neighbor walked out of the mortgage they could no longer manage--I don't even want to know what that did to my own property values. The respectable equity we had built up is GONE and it will be years before we have any hope of recovering it (no--we don't have any other debt right now, people).

Better that they were able to stay there, keep up the place, take care of the grandkids--and keep my own property value up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. People used their equity to make up for the lag in their wages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
9. This sounds pretty damn reckless to me...
Edited on Fri Feb-20-09 12:24 AM by WorseBeforeBetter
"Most got into trouble by refinancing their homes - often more than once - and extracting every possible dollar of equity. The money went toward granite counter-tops, stainless steel appliances, credit cards, student loans, vacations, weddings, cars, etc."

I wouldn't have included student loans in the above -- that speaks to the insane cost of college in this country.

Many DUers deny the granite/stainless, but I saw it first-hand while living in the DC area. When selling my condo, many 20-somethings sniffed at the older kitchen -- I'd like to know how many of them bought the $799K condos and are now whining about being foreclosed on.

Here are some of my measures of "reckless":

--Buying homes at insanely inflated prices.
--Taking on the risk of an ARM when you don't really understand risk.
--Assuming that housing prices always go up.
--Denying that this house of cards wasn't going to fall.
--Buying with no home inspection.
--Ignoring the 33% take-home income rule. (If your bank tried to force more on you, you had the right to say no. I did when World Savings tried to force a huge equity line on me...it's not that difficult.)
--Using your home as an ATM (beyond reason--$50,000 fairy-tale weddings is not "reason").

I'm not saying there aren't legitimate cases out there, but millions of people seemed to lose their heads and we're all paying for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. I'll tell you one story...
A good friend of mine. And a very sad story.

He has worked hard for 17 years, almost all of them at one company, moved his way up the ranks to manager.

He got married to a beautiful girl, she was 28, he was 35... 5 years ago. She worked hard, he worked hard. She
was a legal immigrant from Vietnam, he is from Sri Lanka. Both were US citizens. Her one dream, an American dream, was to buy a house. 2 years after they were married, she was diagnosed with cancer, a rapid form of lymphoma.

He bought a house 1 year later so she could have a small flower garden and gaze at it from her living room couch,
given that she couldn't go outdoors while in chemo, nor could she have visitors.

She died less than 6 months later. The insurance didn't cover everything, including her traditional homeopathic
treatments... to their credit, his company insurance did pay over $1M to try to keep her alive. He paid another
$120,000... but he had to empty his savings completely, cash in his 401K, take up donations at work, and borrow
from friends and family. And he remortgaged his house that he had put 20% down and had a fixed rate 30 year. Now
he has a 100% ARM... and it's reset once already. They also cashed in both of their life
insurance policies to help pay the medical bills.

So there he is, living alone in a house that he can't afford. He just took a 15% pay cut (as all employees did), and he now has a roommate... but he lives in a very sad place. And the house is now worth 2/3rds of what he paid
for it 3 years ago. And he is late with his mortgage. He has cut every expense. No internet, no cable. The thermostat is set to 62 in the winter and 85 in the summer. He cooks every meal at home... and it's mostly rice
and beans with a little chicken or whatever is cheap. He drives a 12 year old Camry with 200K miles.

If he can save his house... if... this is what he has to look forward to for next N years... That's if
he can keep his job AND the company doesn't go broke.

A mortgage reset would help, a housing rebound would help more (he would sell it for what he owes, or even
take a loss, but the loss now is $100K and he doesn't have it).

Otherwise, it's jingle mail time (like the houses on either side of his).

He tells me that he wants enough money to buy the burial plot next to his wife... and that's all he wants now.

I hope he qualifies for some sort of bailout/reset/assistance. But I have no way of knowing if he will.


I'm sure some libertarian Ayn Rand type will be along shortly to say what a deadbeat he is, how he shouldn't have
bought a house, that he should have kept the life insurance policy, or that he deserves bankruptcy for his
"mistake" of buying his dying wife the house she wanted...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Lapfog, I'm so sorry for his loss
It's amazing to me how many on this site believe that they are immune from any kind of downturn or reversal of fortune. Those who sit on their high horse and lecture about "personal responsibility" and "buying below one's means" either do not live on the East/West Coast, work in an industry that is going down fast, or have never had a medical emergency that's not paid for or only partially covered by insurance.

We currently have no health insurance. It scares the shit out of me. My husband had an incident a year ago in December; we were COVERED by heath insurance, and after deductibles and other insurance company non-paying items, it STILL cost us almost two grand for a four-hour emergency room visit. We made payments.

I can't even imagine how desperate your friend is right now. I hope that he qualifies for the bailout, because if someone needs it, it's that guy. Bad enough to lose your loved one, but to lose his credit rating, his house and everything else? God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. You said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
12. The River Flows
The river flows
It flows to the sea
Wherever that river goes
That's where I want to be
Flow river flow
Let your waters wash down
Take me from this road
To some other town

All he wanted
Was to be free
And that's the way
It turned out to be
Flow river flow
Let your waters wash down
Take me from this road
To some other town

Flow river flow
Past the shaded tree
Go river, go
Go to the sea
Flow to the sea

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
13. People who haven't yet had 2 weeks worth of bad luck. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
14. Who is "responsible?"
:shrug:

D is 32 and makes 60,000 a year. She recently bought a house for 660,000. She is very responsible and pays her mortgage on time. She and her boyfriend are going to Australia on vacation next month.

C is 42 and recently started a business which is proving a little hard to get off the ground. Before he started his business he made minimum wage in a dead-end job. He makes 20,000 a year. He rents a room in a house for 800, but he spends most of the time at his boyfriend's house. He buys food for the boyfriend and the boyfriend's daughter, because the boyfriend has been unemployed for 6 months. C is currently in default on his student loans, and has to borrow thousands from his parents to meet basic needs.

J and D are 35 and 40. They have a combined income of 150,000, and they recently bought a 600,000 house. J is pregnant and will be taking time off from work to have the baby.

S is 55 and makes 40,000 a year. She pays 500 a month for rent, and there were recently mass layoffs at her workplace which she escaped. She and her boyfriend went to Brazil 6 weeks ago, and in 6 weeks they are going to Panama.

Who is responsible? Who isn't? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Ya know...
Yeah--you said it very very well. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
18. I Say We Call For Surprise Inspections
Any home with a granite, marble, or cement counter-top - no bailout.


Any home with a polished cement, hardwood, or marble flooring - no bailout!

Any home with Wolf, Bosch, or Aga appliances - no bailout!


:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. We have Pergo downstairs
Does this mean we're declined?

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Busted, Busted, Busted
Sorry, missy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. And here I thought that we were being responsible because it was more affordable than carpeting!
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carlyhippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
19. I have watched "House Hunters" for years on HGTV
and constantly asked how the people on the show, with the jobs they claimed to have, could afford a 800,000 mcmansion. I have a 49,000 mortgage and I think the payments are high, I must live in a place where wages are lower than other parts of the country I guess. I often wonder just how many of the folks on house hunters are still in their homes today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
20. I don't want my tax money paying off anyone's house when I have to rent.
Edited on Fri Feb-20-09 08:56 AM by alarimer
Where's my bailout? My rent has gone up dramatically because of higher property taxes, yet I can't even claim that on my tax returns.

I have been responsible and not bought a house I couldn't afford so why are people who did being rewarded?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. What if I don't want to pay off whatever it is you might need?
Banks? We use a credit union, and have for years now. Why should we support the FDIC? Our credit union isn't failing.

Schools? We don't have kids there. Why should we pay for your kids?

>I have been responsible and not bought a house I couldn't afford so why are people who did being rewarded?

You think that losing a job through no fault of our own, despite years of responsible behavior, is "irresponsible"? Jesus.

Why don't you reread what you wrote and think it over? The clue phone's ringing, and it's for you: There are now millions of people who've lost good jobs, can't find another despite diligent and daily effort, and it's not a choice of whether they want to rent or not. It's a choice between living inside and homelessness. Nice to know that you are so angry over the fact you haven't bought a residence that you believe those who have (and are now out of work,) deserve to suffer.

Figure it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. It is for the stability of society - what would happen if millions
foreclosed? We'd all be renting from the rich. I rent too. But it's about more than just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Millions are foreclosing. Right now.
There is a "rocket docket" in Florida, for instance, that is churning out 1,000 foreclosures a day. Yes, you read that right. One courthouse, one state. One thousand per day.

It'll be a great marketplace for buyers. After all, how low can the foreclosed houses go for? At the same time, the misery will be off the charts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malta blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
25. I hope I can benefit from the new program
The STBE Mr MB up and left with with a mortgage that was twice what I paid when I was a single mom. And now I am a single mom again. My mortgage eats up my entire paycheck each month, and I have to rely on child support for my expenses, food and utilities.

I have never been late on a payment.

I have never missed a payment.

I would call myself "responsible". I would call him the biggest asshole on the planet for doing this. He has not given me a penny toward the mortgage, although the is the primary borrower. But see - the foreclosure would not hurt him - he did not put a penny in. I used all the equity from my single person home and invested it in this. I would lose 75k in equity alone.

What do I do?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
29. It's not even that easy
Some homeowners could have afforded to buy the fancy stuff at one point, or have it paid off; do we judge the "responsibility" based on whether or not their houses look fancier than ours? My mom retiled her kitchen floor, but didn't refinance for it - yet, according to this author and others on this thread, without knowing that, she would be "irresponsible."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
30. The litmus test for this is pretty easy
If you bought a second home, investment property, or did a cash-out refinance you get nothing. If your loan was done for the purpose of purchasing a primary residence or a Rate & Term refinance (cash-out is limited to < $500 in these refi transactions) then you are eligible for assistance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC