Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Arnold pulls an open primary rabbit out of his hat." This can't be good.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 12:51 AM
Original message
"Arnold pulls an open primary rabbit out of his hat." This can't be good.
All the attention this morning is on Sen. Abel Maldonado, the Santa Maria Republican who cast the critical vote for California's budget package just hours ago.

But no matter how much you blame him for the state's budget mess, you have to hand it to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. He helped engineer the final deal, and got something he wanted in the process -- a 2010 ballot measure for an open primary.

It's hard to overstate what a radical change this could be for congressional and legislative races in California. If it passed, candidates for all parties would run against each other in the primary, with the top-two vote getters moving on to a runoff. That would open up chances for the Green Party to win in the Bay Area and Libertarians to win in conservative districts. It could rewrite the political map in our wacky state in ways we can't even imagine.


more at: http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/the_swarm/2009/02/019785.html

I can't see any positive in this especially since it comes from REPUBLICAN Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oregon handily defeated an open primary initiative in November
Edited on Fri Feb-20-09 12:56 AM by depakid
Californiians will probably defeat theirs, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I hope so. We couldn't defeat Prop H8. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Oregon couldn't defeat their version, either
That's why their legislature created domestic partnerships with very nearly the same effect- but without calling it marraige.

That managed to derail the bigots, who now can't even get enough signitures on a ballot measure to try to overturn it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. This is why open primaries would be a disaster.
The idea of a primary is for each party to elect the best candidate to run against the best candidates of other parties. If you want a Green or a Libertarian in an office then you need to do run off voting after the candidates have been selected, in the general election. In open primaries, Republicans would be able to vote for the most conservative member of another party and vice versa and we would never actually get the best candidate for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Heard that. Talk about playing politics.
All that sturm and drang -- and meanwhile 55 of my actual neighbors lost their actual jobs Tuesday night by a local city council vote -- and Arnie is fucking around with the election system.

Man this state is corrupt to the core.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. We used to have the open primary system...
And I liked it. People have to work harder to get elected, and that's a good thing.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. The problem I see is that it allows repukes to use their money advantage
to knock out less well financed Dem opponents in the primaries. And you know if Arnie's pimping for it, it's part of some some corrupt repuke trick to help them steal elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. This is true...
It's also a compelling argument for getting the special interests out of campaign financing.

The clean money campaign is the way to go...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I still can't believe they got away with putting that ape in the statehouse.
They didn't have ANYTHING on Davis, nothing. And remember how they ran Kevin Shelley out on a rail a few months afterward? I have serious doubts about the integrity of that whole switcheroo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I believe the election was honest...
People were starstruck, no kidding.

They couldn't wait to vote for this famous guy...

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I thought so too at the time.
I also thought Dukemejian beat Bradley fair and square. Turns out Bradley won the election, just like the pollsters predicted and the exit polls showed--until the absentee ballots were counted, then surprise, "Bradley effect." These last eight years have pretty much cast doubt on every repuke victory in the last thirty, maybe more. Don't forget Nixon came out of California too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. I never thought it was honest.
Edited on Fri Feb-20-09 02:11 AM by Cleita
There was too much chicanery going on behind the scenes. It's also rumored that out of state money from the same crowd who bankrolled the swift boat veterans were behind the recall of Grey Davis. There is no way Darryl Issa could have bankrolled the recall from his car alarm business. There's a lot that needs to be investigated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC