|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Winterblues (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-20-09 11:04 AM Original message |
I was under the impression there was no Statute of Limitations on "War Crimes" but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynnTheDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-20-09 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
1. There is no statute of limitations on war crimes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pleah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-20-09 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
2. I was watching that, too. I was surprised Rachel didn't question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-20-09 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
3. There is a legal distinction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-20-09 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
4. I think the problem is more pronounced with illegal wiretapping |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-20-09 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
5. Here's info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-20-09 11:27 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. does the statutory clock begin ticking at the moment of authorization, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-20-09 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
6. I haven't read where there is a real statute of limitations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-20-09 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
8. extending the statute to 10 yrs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-20-09 12:03 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Wouldn't such an extension be an illegal ex post facto law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC