Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Drought may cut off federal water to Calif. farms

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 02:11 PM
Original message
Drought may cut off federal water to Calif. farms
Drought may cut off federal water to Calif. farms

Friday, February 20, 2009

(02-20) 10:02 PST SACRAMENTO (AP) --

Federal water managers say they may have to cut off all water to some of California's largest farms as a result of the deepening drought affecting the state.

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation officials said Friday that parched reservoirs and patchy snow and rainfall this year would likely force them to completely cut surface water deliveries. It would be the first time in more than 15 years such a move was taken.

The move would be a blow to farmers, who say the price of some crops will likely rise if they have to rely only on well water. The state estimates it will cause $1 billion dollars in lost revenue and cost 40,000 jobs.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/02/20/financial/f095156S15.DTL&tsp=1


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ComtesseDeSpair Donating Member (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow, when it rains-er, when it DOESN'T rain, it pours!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Westlands again.
FYI, most of the Central Valley was actually seasonal marshlands and swamps before it was settled, and the vast majority of that area has enough water to survive several more years of drought before cutting of water completely. Westlands was a dry wasteland up until the feds decided to "develop" the area in the 1950's, and they are 100% dependent on water allocations from the federal government to keep their land from turning back into a desert.

There's plenty of water, but the problem here is water rights. The primary water rights holders to all of the rivers in California are the irrigation districts that border them. Cities like SF have junior water rights after those districts. Court orders have given environmental protection water rights just below the cities. Contracted sales by those top level irrigation districts have rights just below the fish and birds. And the feds? The federal government comes in dead last in the water rights, only getting to take its water needs from whatever is left over from the other users. When supplies get tight, they get nothing at all...and districts like Westlands get nothing.

But here's something to consider. The white area in the map outlines the irrigated farmland throughout the Central Valley. The colored spot shows the small portion of that land dependent on federal water. When you hear that Central Valley farmers are going belly-up because federal water is being cut off, remember two things: 1) The vast majority of farms here aren't dependent on federal water at all. 2) While most of the valley farms are still owned by families, Westlands mostly a collection of industrial corporate farms. Very few people live there, and those who do are mostly employees of the companies. Heck, if you look it up on Google Earth, you'll see that the area even LOOKS different...where the rest of the valley is a collection of smaller farms and orchards, Westlands is a massive grid of enormous industrial agriculture.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wouldn't it be ironic...
if there was a mass migration of dustbowl Californians back to Oklahoma?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I wouldn't be surprised... Kansas and Oklahoma have plenty of water...
We have some big-ass aquifers beneath us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC