Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama nixes plan to tax motorists on mileage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillieW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 06:55 PM
Original message
Obama nixes plan to tax motorists on mileage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. So you started this thread, how do you think roads should be paid for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. From taxes on gas.
the more you drive, the more gas you use, and the more you pay in taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Should gas taxes be how we pay for roads? How much are you willing to pay for a gallon of gas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. What's the difference?
Pay by the mile or pay by the tax per gallon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Our current system is a mixture of general revenue funds and pay per gallon
That's the difference
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I just don't see a need
to tax by the mile. How would that even be tracked?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Do you think general revenue funds should be used to pay for roads?
That was my question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. It would invite cheating. Put a transponder in every car?
Those can be 'fucked with'....put "readers" out on the highway? That would drive people to the secondary roads.

Deval Patrick wanted to put a chip in our inspection stickers. The entire state...er...hooted at him.

You can disable those chips in passports with a smart crack of a hammer. I'm sure you could do the same thing (carefully, of course, so as not to break the windscreen) to one that was hidden inside an inspection sticker.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Big difference for those with fuel efficient cars that do far less damage to the roads...
You would be seeing Hummers and hybrids being charged the same tax, if it were per mile, but we know the Hummer is infinitely more destructive to roads and the environment. Case closed. Per mile tax is a shitty idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. The difference is that when it is a per gallon tax
those of us who drive something like a Civic pay a smaller price per mile than someone who drives a gas guzzler.

As the article notes, a per mile tax could take away some of the incentive to drive more fuel efficient cars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I'm all for gas taxes.
Taxation, on top of generating .gov revenue, is used to alter behavior. The biggest problem with the mileage tax is that it hits the environmentally conscious vehicles as well as the polluters.

I'd say go for taxes on fossil-fuels, and for now at least, cut the electric and bio-fueled vehicle drivers a break. That should help encourage people to switch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. It was a stupid idea
User taxes only hurt the middle class and the poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. In so many ways that would be a regressive tax
If I could afford to live closer to downtown where the jobs are, where my job is, I certainly would. If the bus didn't add an extra hour each way to my already long commute, I would take the bus. If I had to pay taxes on mileage, I would feel like I was being billed extra for not being wealthy enough to live closer to town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Are there places closer to town where the rent/mortgage would be less than what you're paying now?
Edited on Fri Feb-20-09 07:40 PM by taterguy
I don't know your life story but I suspect there are.

They're just places you wouldn't want to live.

So you make a choice and expect someone else to pick up the tab.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. That's absurd. Clearly you don't live near a large, expensive city.
And in what way is that someone else 'picking up the tab'?

Anyway, my point wasn't my personal story, but that tax on consumer goods and 'user' taxes most heavily burdens the poor and middle classes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Someone else is picking up the tab because automobile usage is heavily subsidized
The article in the thread states that 8 billion dollars of general revenue funds went to roads last year.

That's only the tip of the iceberg. It doesn't count things like the cost of defense spending that exists just to insure the free flow of oil.

It's true that user fees aren't progressive but I don't know of a way to make them progressive. I'd hate to have to present my latest tax return every time I bought a tank of gas.

And of course everything is relative. People that are truly poor can't afford cars, but their tax money goes to those who can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC