http://pufferfish.typepad.com/<snip>
I guess what I have to say about the now-notorious tirade emitted by CNBC dipshit Rick Santelli is that it was utterly predictable, along with the reaction from mouth-breathing hysterics from right wingers who have found a TV personality to lead them. But while Santelli froths about his "silent majority" and the "losers" who can't pay their mortgage, it's readily apparent that the folks he's speaking for are an ever increasing vocal minority. Since the bubble burst, right-wing pundits have been trying to spin the yarn that the government forced helpless banks to lend to poor people, most of which were minorities. This, of course, is nonsense. What the tantrum misses is the crucial fact that predatory lenders made a fortune getting people not in the habit of paying their bills on time to sign up for high-interest mortgages. Then Wall St. came up with the brilliant idea of taking those shaky mortgages and used them to finance investments. Then the dominos began to fall and even the people who should have been able to make housing payments suddenly were getting fired and/ or finding that their real estate was no longer worth as much as their mortgage. Uh oh. This is much more complicated than running around hysterically to complain about personal responsibility.
Also, take a look at Santelli's bio. He worked for
Drexel, Burnham Lambert, the junk bond empire, then he ran derivatives, before working in futures and hedge funds. The dude got filthy rich gaming the system and is now pissed that the government is going to come in with a heavy hand. Which makes me skeptical that his interests are with the traders down on the floor and not the executives lording above.
Why did St Rudy of 9/11 take out Drexel, Burnham and Lambert? Do GECNBC and Freepers know their saint worked with this junk bond empire.
Here Freepers:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drexel_Burnham_Lambert--------------