Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mass transit gets the shaft in California budget......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 08:28 PM
Original message
Mass transit gets the shaft in California budget......
from the San Francisco Chronicle:



Transit to see service cuts, fare increases
Rachel Gordon

Friday, February 20, 2009


What changes: The revised budget cuts state assistance for public transit operations for the remainder of the fiscal year, leaving just $76 million of the $306 million promised to operators in California when the original budget was adopted. The reduction deals an $83 million blow to Bay Area transit agencies. Next year there will be no transit assistance coming from Sacramento. Transportation agencies, already seeing less money for operations due to declining tax revenue in the economic downturn, have yet to make final decisions on how to balance the books.

What it means to you: Riders might see less service, higher fares and dirtier vehicles. BART is considering raising fares and reducing the frequency of train service. AC Transit is considering service cuts and fare hikes. The San Francisco Municipal Railway plans to defer maintenance, which could result in more missed runs.

Reaction: "The state's abandonment of transit operations, even as ridership rises, is a huge setback for people who want to get to work, to school or to the doctor in an environmentally sustainable way," said Muni spokesman Judson True. BART spokesman Linton Johnson said the funding loss "is equivalent of leaving the fare gates wide open every weekday for nearly a month."

Highlights

-- California transit agencies lost three-quarters of state funding for the remainder of this fiscal year. For Bay Area transit agencies, the combined cuts amount to $83 million. State transit assistance for next year was eliminated. The financial blow will be felt from Petaluma to San Jose.

-- Local agencies are still working on final plans to balance their budgets but are considering raising fares, cutting service and deferring maintenance.

-- The regional TransLink and 511 programs will be affected.


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/02/20/MN7D161AOO.DTL&hw=reduction+bay+area+transit&sn=001&sc=1000


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. that's a travesty
sorry to hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. They shut down the Bay Bridge Retrofit project as well
Don't want to be driving on that bridge in case of earthquake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I thought that project was considered essential.......
n/t


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. They also shut down Sacramento Airport Terminal B project
Edited on Sun Feb-22-09 08:45 PM by FreakinDJ
Aaaarrnnold has been putting 1000s on the unemployment rolls by placing holds on funding through executive orders and the RATpubliCON media is trying to make him look like the good guy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Time for "Total Recall II - Send the Gropernator Back to Hollywood!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks Republican fuckheads!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. California should have sued Enron to get back the 7 or 8 billion it lost through price gouging.
Remember a few years back when it came out Enron was artificially creating an energy shortage in order to justify charging higher premiums?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Grey Davis did and California Won Billions
except Aaarrnnold excepted $.006 on the dollar in the Award Settelment

Way to balance that budget Aarrnnold !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Wow! Didn't know that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Just like Pete Wilson told him too
There were plenty of rumors around Arnold meeting with Pete wilson, Ken Lay, and his advisors in a LA hotel prior to winning the governor's seat in California. His actions with the settlement pretty much confirmed it.

Arnold hasn't done any thing with Calif other then make us into a Big Joke - but Hey - he's got muscles - in the head!

His idea of Workman's Comp Reform - No such thing as "Back Pain" The insurance companies could not have gotten a sweeter deal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC