Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Admits to Afghan Civilian Deaths (13 of 16 killed in US Missile Strikes Were Civilians)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 10:48 PM
Original message
US Admits to Afghan Civilian Deaths (13 of 16 killed in US Missile Strikes Were Civilians)
US admits Afghan civilian deaths

An investigation into a missile strike carried out by US-led forces in Afghanistan earlier this week has found that 13 civilians were among 16 people killed, the US military has said.

The military made the admission on Saturday, after originally saying that 15 opposition fighters had been killed in the strike in the Gozara district of Herat province.

Afghan officials insisted all along that six women and two children were among those killed.

<snip>

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2009/02/200922115299177143.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. more mission accomplished! winning hearts and minds
are they throwing flowers yet ? oh wait this is afghanistan not iraq...guess what...same bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Same bullshit different President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. And this is why we have no business being there.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. Civilian casualties expected to rise with additional troops :( n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. Civilian deaths rose *40% in 2008*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. "A tragic mistake..", "We regret..", "An investigation will be held.."
yada, yada, yada, from the masters of yada, yada, yada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressIn2008 Donating Member (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. K&R for more of the same permawar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. When the US ruling elite acknowledges murdering a million
since they began funding civil war in Afghanistan, well then I'll give them a point or two for honor. Not to mention Southeast Asia or Latin America or Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. Morning kick... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. now that's progress!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Bakery Wagon Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
11. There's probably a mathmatical formula that can predict
how many new "bin ladens" the US creates every time new civilians are murdered.

like >200 dead civilians = 1/3 new "bin laden" or >600 = one full new bin laden

And this provides for the next round of "defense" department budget increases

and the commoners keep rolling over

Which country will be "lucky" enough to get the next new US "Defense" base?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yesterday's Dem Now!
Obama’s War: US Involvement in Afghanistan, Past, Present & Future

http://www.democracynow.org/2009/2/23/obamas_war_us_involvement_in_afghanistan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC