Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Clinton Sips Tea With a Potentate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 04:17 AM
Original message
Hillary Clinton Sips Tea With a Potentate
Late in an article written for McClatchy about Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s tour of Asia, Tim Johnson mentions

In Japan, the first stop on her trip, Clinton had tea with an old acquaintance, Empress Michiko, who almost never meets diplomats.


http://www.mcclatchydc.com/117/story/62601.html

Born Shoda Michiko, the current Empress was the first commoner to marry into the Japanese foreign family. She broke with tradition and breast fed her own children, raised them, fixing their box lunches herself, which roused the scorn of her in-laws, who bullied her so badly that she lost her voice for months in the 1960s. By American standards, her job is a stultifying one, since she must present herself as a model of virtue, modesty and patience at all times—the ideal Japanese wife—even though she was educated at Harvard and Oxford. The highlight of her year is presiding over Japan’s annual silkworm festival. She gets to feed to bugs---

I guess this proves that even Empresses need some one to raise public awareness of their plight.



On Saturday Feb. 21, the New York Times gently criticized Secretary of State Clinton for emphasizing the environment---specifically greenhouse gas emissions---rather then getting all in-your-face with China about Tibet. Because everyone knows that the only human rights violations that China commits of any importance are those that occur in Tibet.

Human rights groups have criticized Mrs. Clinton for soft-pedaling Tibet and other issues during her first visit as secretary of state. She said she did not want these disputes to interfere with critical challenges like climate change, the global economic crisis and security concerns.
It was a stark contrast to 1995, when Mrs. Clinton, then first lady, gave a speech in Beijing at a United Nations conference, in which she catalogued abuses against women and concluded by saying that “human rights are women’s rights, and women’s rights are human rights.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/22/world/asia/22diplo.html?hp

Funny how every rights group on earth---and I mean every rights group on earth. That includes racial and religious minorities and gays, too---sometimes forgets that discrimination begins at our own front door. On Sunday, Feb. 22, the Secretary of State held a meeting which did not get a lot of press coverage. I did not see an article about it in the New York Times.

Earlier in the day, Clinton attended a church service, then hosted two dozen women lawyers, domestic abuse experts, entrepreneurs and activists, many of whom she had met on previous trips to China.
"I have such vivid memories of our times together in the past," Clinton enthused, before launching into questions about the status of women's rights issues in the country. The meeting was held at the U.S. Embassy to avoid sensitivities of the Chinese government.
"In no society, certainly including my own, are women treated equally yet," she added.
Tim Johnson from McClatchy


But…but…China is the bad guy. They put plastic in our milk and undercut our labor prices and oppress Tibet and own our national debt. She isn’t supposed to talk about how we are just like them when it comes to the exploitation of half their citizens. Does not she know that we are in the middle of a world economic crisis? Women’s issues are a luxury that will have to wait.

http://www.npc.umich.edu/poverty/

In the United States

Poverty rates are highest for families headed by single women, particularly if they are black or Hispanic. In 2007, 28.3 percent of households headed by single women were poor, while 13.6 percent of households headed by single men and 4.9 percent of married-couple households lived in poverty.


Worldwide

http://poverty.suite101.com/article.cfm/feminization_of_poverty

70 per cent of the world's poor are women. The majority of the 1.5 billion people living on $1 a day or less are women.The gap between men and women caught in the cycle of poverty has continued to widen in recent years. This alarming trend is referred to as ‘the feminization of poverty’.

Snip

Women need to be able to actively participate in economic and political life. Empowering women is a critical factor in stopping the cycle of poverty.


As I have discussed in several recent journals, poverty and wealth disparity are some of the major motivators and risk factors for war.

“Poverty dehumanizes….it destroys emotional life, one’s relationships with others; it continually places obstacles in the way of the essential vocation of human beings to develop themselves and expand their abilities beyond the survival instinct, it leads them to envy, hatred, violence against those responsible for their misery…”

Leonardo Boff Saint Francis


We will not reduce war and violence on earth unless we reduce the incidence of poverty. And poverty wears the face of a child and a mother.

Clinton made clear then that advancing women's rights would be a hallmark of her job.

"I view this not only as a moral issue, but as a security issue," she said.

Tim Johnson McClatchy



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R so far so good....better than Rice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueraven95 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. Kicking...thanks for the info! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. In today's WP, Anne Applebaum doesn't understand that women's rights are human rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Thanks for the info. Applebaum is like the NYT. Oppression of Tibet is the ONLY
Edited on Tue Feb-24-09 01:27 PM by McCamy Taylor
oppression China commits. She chastises Clinton (and Obama_) for not making it issue number one. Does not comment at all about the global issue of women and poverty.

If we address religious intolerance (which she wants to be first on the agenda) then we also have to take up our own wars against Muslim people all over the world including Palestine and our profiling of Muslims and our excuse for the same on the ground that they are a threat to our national security since their religion makes them all "jihadists".

Here is her article.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/23/AR2009022302290.html?hpid%3Dopinionsbox1&sub=AR

In fact, Palestine fights because it is poor . It is a classic Marxist/colonialist struggle.

Thank god for McClatchy. I am glad that someone in the United States gets it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Tibet has really good PR because of the DL. YES - about Palestine and poverty. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. women of the world are so thankful Hillary is S of S


me too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Let me add a kick to my rec.
:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. She looks great! I think she was born to have this job
It's such a relief to see a competent, well-liked person in this position. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. OP conflates China and Japan
Empress Michiko, as stated early in the OP, is the Japanese Empress. That Clinton's meeting with her did not include any tirades about China's human rights record is... unsurprising.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Her Asian trip, overall, is being criticized for not raising the issue. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Huh? You need to elaborate on your point. Did I criticize Clinton for
not complaining to the Japanese empress about China's problems? (Actually a world wide problem).

I was trying to point out that even the potentate in question, the Japanese empress has been the victim of gender discrimination designed to keep Japanese women subservient, in dead end, low wage jobs for the benefit of Japanese big business. She has suffered medical and psychological illness as a result of the pressures brought to bear upon her so that the status quo in Japan can keep women down. I will bet that she really appreciates the efforts of Hillary Clinton to improve the lot of women in industrialized and developing nations.

I am sorry that this message did not come through to those who read the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC