Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ex-CEO of kosher slaughterhouse: Grand jury biased

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 09:38 AM
Original message
Ex-CEO of kosher slaughterhouse: Grand jury biased
:eyes:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h6D19n6iXOIscqxYjzf5ujU_auQQD96HFG780

Ex-CEO of kosher slaughterhouse: Grand jury biased

19 hours ago


CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa (AP) — Attorneys for the former CEO of the nation's largest kosher meatpacking plant say immigration, bank fraud and other charges against him should be dismissed because the grand jury that indicted him was biased against Jews.

Sholom Rubashkin faces nearly 100 federal counts and is accused of helping illegal immigrants get fake documents so they could work at Agriprocessors Inc.'s slaughterhouse in Postville, Iowa.

On Monday, his attorney and an attorney for Agriprocessors asked U.S. District Judge Linda Reade to dismiss the charges against Rubashkin and the company.

The attorneys say the grand jury developed prejudices based on Jewish stereotypes.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Sean Berry says the indictment was based on evidence, not religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe they are biased
Maybe they are biased against illegal acts like knowingly hiring illegal immigrants, bank fraud, identity theft and other things. Yes, I'd say that the Grand Jury is indeed biased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Seems the defense has little or nothing to actually offer in defense of the charges
I can't blame the defense attorneys, they must give their clients the best defense possible.
Even if it isn't much of a defense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevenmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. If that's the best defense Sholom has then he has a bit of a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Pathetic. The man has no conscience. He ruined a lot of people's lives. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veritas_et_Aequitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. Prove it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC