madamesilverspurs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-09 08:45 AM
Original message |
Lousy speech wasn't Jindal's fault. |
|
It was simply a matter of forced poor perception. According to Kiran Chetny of CNN Jindal didn't have an equal venue, he wasn't in a huge room surrounded by an adoring crowd to applaud and cheer. So it's no wonder that his speech seemed so stinky.
Gack.
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-09 08:46 AM
Response to Original message |
1. she should go back to faux where she came from |
SammyWinstonJack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-09 08:48 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Always with the excuses. Sad, really. |
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-09 08:49 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Elections have consequences. That was why President Obama got to address a joint session of Congress in the Capitol while Governor Jindal got to address a camera in the Louisiana governor's mansion.
|
Wilber_Stool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-09 08:49 AM
Response to Original message |
4. His speech was fucking pre-recorded. |
|
They didn't think it was important enough so they pre-recorded it.
|
billybob537
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-09 08:50 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Pukes look more delusional every time you open your purdy mouth
|
Dawgs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-09 08:51 AM
Response to Original message |
6. That was just one of MANY reasons it was so "stinky". |
Mari333
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-09 08:51 AM
Response to Original message |
7. He spoke like he was telling kindergartners about looking both ways |
|
when they cross the street. I couldnt have asked for a more surreal presentation, and all the excuses made by GOP pundits will heighten my laughter even more.
|
ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-09 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. He was horribly condescending in tone, you're certainly right about that. |
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-09 08:51 AM
Response to Original message |
|
jeesh, glad they cleared that up for me.
|
ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-09 09:03 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Nor was he in a room with over 200 people avowed to bring him down |
|
Just about half of the people in the room, Republicans all, as President Obama spoke would have far prefered he had never existed and averse to any and near all of his programs.
|
LiberalFighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-09 09:21 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Does the idiot Kiran realize that the Democrats had the same type of venue |
|
when a Republican has been president? Does the idiot realize that the Democrats did not complain about their venue and were happy with their selected individuals giving the response?
|
EmilyAnne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-09 09:24 AM
Response to Original message |
12. I think "applaud and cheer" would have been more like "boo loudly and throw tomatoes at." |
|
Seriously, invoking the Katrina disaster. Even the Republicans would have winced. They don't want anyone remembering that. Who the hell wrote that speech?
|
Johonny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message |
|
That's equal from where I was seeing the speeches.
|
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-09 10:27 AM
Response to Original message |
14. Britt Hume tried that too. And then he actually told a truth.... |
|
"With that being said" then he said something like it was a really weak performance.
|
surrealAmerican
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message |
15. Gotta love the party of "personal responsibility" ... |
|
... when they can't even be held responsible for the words that come out of their own mouths.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:46 AM
Response to Original message |