Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Marxism is...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 12:55 PM
Original message
Poll question: Marxism is...






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Marx's diagnosis of the problems were and still are spot on.
His prescription for correction has been proven flawed in real world attempts. He is absolutely correct, though, in describing most conflicts as class struggles.

The implementation of solutions to the class struggles must be updated and corrected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Actually Trotsky anticipated the tyranny that was Soviet socialism.
The Revolution Betrayed is an amazing read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. That's howcome he got dead, huh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #21
39. "Mr. Stalin, in Mexico City, with the ice pick."
I win!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FKA MNChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Ding ding ding!
Brilliant and still accurate analysis and diagnosis. Not so good a prescription.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Exactly what I was about to say.
His analysis of the problems of capitalism are dead nuts on, while his suggested alternative is realistically flawed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. *if*
his diagnosis of the problems was correct, then his prescription for correction would have worked.

the reason WHY it didn't work was because the underlying assumptions were wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. it because .. implementing it is a pie in the sky ..
Edited on Wed Feb-25-09 03:13 PM by TheCoxwain
it creates alternate power center that as corruptible as any other ....

once that happens you are staring down the barrel.... as there is no way to change it unlike a democracy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #25
35. Democracy has nothing to do with it -nt-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. His numbers are all wrong though
Especially in Das Kapital - he knows a great deal about Sociology, next to nothing about real economics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #23
33. Nope.
He was right in his diagnosis. Class struggles are the cause of instability. The have-nots and he have-too-much. But, he approached the solution wrongly. It is not a black and white, he was entirely right or he was entirely wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good theory, has some mistakes. Kind of like Free Market Economics. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Marx's descriptions were dead on
and they've held up for over 100 years.

It's his prescription for change that's problematic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Another vote for Groucho!
:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. *honk honk*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. Marxism is...
A groundbreaking system of theory for the analysis and critique of the industrialized capitalist world. It has provided exceptional insight into the exploitation, mobilization and identification of the Proletariat, their culture, ideals and asperations. It has also provided a necessary critique for the hypocrisies inherent in Liberal, Bourgeoisie culture.

That said, it's implementation as a system of government has been spotty. In certain societies, (Scandanavia, Germany, France) Socialism on Marxist principles has produced a system with a high quality of life, and strong respect for democratic principles. In other parts of the world it has produced atrocity and disaster. In order for the Swedish/West European model to work, it is arguable that there needs to be a strong foundation of liberal democracy in the nation to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yep, what he said
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. Yes, Marx never really anticipated that socialism would be implemented in places like Russia.
And certainly not China. He thought it would take root in places with a history of liberal democracy. Strange, then, that the two most notable cited examples of socialist states are China and the USSR, where a frankly bastardized form of socialism was imposed on cultures that were newly liberated from serfdom and which had experienced nothing but dictatorship. So socialism was tarred with the authoritarian brush, so much that now the only thing right-wingers can see in this political system, apparently, is authoritarianism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #27
34. 1930s USA would have been a good place to start
At least it was a period bubbling with class awareness and conflict.

But along came FDR and bam! all that class stuff and all those Leftists started to disappear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Other. Marxism is...
...way, way too complex for most people to understand because it takes more words than fit on a bumper sticker to describe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. ...Totally Fucking Stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Why dis it? capitalism is a dead end
Edited on Wed Feb-25-09 02:48 PM by wuushew
It is a system that will inevitably destroy itself.

You aren't against democratic socialism are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Yep - inflation kills us all
And that's how Capitalism dies

Granted, I think Marx was wearing rose colored glasses - saying man would evolve into a stateless society. I'd like that to be the case, I really would, but ain't going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Every inch of it? Or just recent applications?
You do know that John Maynard Keynes used Marxist theory in much of his theories.

And that man saved Capitalism

Marx has problems, yes, Labor Theory Value comes to mind as one of Marx's biggest errors. Yeah, there will always be a demand for buggy whips, so we should pay buggy whip makers as much as brain surgeons :eyes:

A lot of applied Marxism requires society to freeze, without new technologies. We all know how well that works.

But, in terms of defining class struggle, he was years ahead. And in that arena, he was a genius.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. He Was An Overzealous Jackass; Not A Genius.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Overzealous, yes
Jackass, never met him

Genius, well look at any econ theory before Marx and then after - talk to any Economist, even Milton Friedman, and they will at least admit he was years ahead of his time

Are you mistaking Marxist-Leninism or Marxist-Maoism for Marxism?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. I'm not convinced that he wasn't a jackass.
When I first read The Communist Manifesto years ago, I had an edition that mentioned in its introduction that Marx once referred to a rival named Ferdinand Lasalle as a "dirty Jew of Negro blood". That always shocked me. I recently came across a book at the library where I work entitled "Karl Marx:Racist" by Nathaniel Weyl. It contains excerpts from correspondences between Marx and Engels in which they disparage blacks and even Jews (despite the fact that Marx was Jewish). The letters are not pretty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Karl Marx WAS a self-hating Jew
This is documented - but I always thought Jackassery had to be assessed in person.

BUT, his theories are still very correct

Nietzsche was a great philosopher, but was anti-Semitic (granted, only in his last days - and one could attribute this to senility)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamuti Lotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #30
38. Nietzsche as anti-Semitic?!
'only in his last days' when he was writing letters to his friend Overbeck, wanting to have them all shot? Or stated in The Antichrist, "An anti-Semite is certainly not made more decent by the fact that he lies on principle. . . ."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. Dude, like totally.
Marx was all like stupid & stuff.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. A valid analytical tool, but worthless in terms of governance.
It raises great questions, and provides horrid answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #13
36. Well said! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. More correct than it is incorrect
Severely misunderstood, in any case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. Other: Not on my plate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. If we're voting based on the pics, Trots looks the most like Johnny Depp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
26. A helluva a lot better than capitalism, but still relies bosses.
Marx should have never had Bakunin thrown out of the 1st International.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
28. Marx had many good ideas but his Hegelianism totally turned the rest to crap.
The most BS part of all being his historical determinism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. That, and his Dialectical Materialism
Granted, without Dialectical Materialism, we would have no "People's History"

So I guess it wasn't ALL bad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
37. I'm just wondering how Trotsky got those glasses to stay on his face.
Neat trick, dat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
40. Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
I FUCKING LOVE Marxisms! Groucho was one of the funniest motherfuckers to ever crap in a toilet.

Oh, wait. MarxISM? Fuck. Never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FKA MNChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
41. Marx got the diagnosis exactly right, but TR and FDR
prescribed the right cure: nail the "malefactors of great wealth" and greedy, predatory capitalists. Preferably to the wall or a very stout tree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
42. There is nothing wrong with Marxism. It is the only sensible way to study history.
People do not realize that almost all social science is guided by Marxist principle nowadays. That is because they do not know what Marxism is. Anthropology, archeology, literary studies---it has influenced so many academic fields that it is practically ubiquitous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. "Influenced" != "only sensible way"
Anyone talking about the One True Way to study history clearly hasn't done much of it himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC