Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Minnesota Judges Strike Key Coleman Witness, After Failure To Share Evidence

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 06:00 PM
Original message
Minnesota Judges Strike Key Coleman Witness, After Failure To Share Evidence
Minnesota Judges Strike Key Coleman Witness, After Failure To Share Evidence
By Eric Kleefeld - February 25, 2009, 4:57PM


The Minnesota election court just laid down some serious punishment against Norm Coleman's legal team, granting Team Franken's motion to strike the testimony of a key witness involved in Coleman's claim that absentee ballots had been double-counted.

This came about because the witness, election worker Pamela Howell, had typed up some personal notes weeks ago and gave them to the Coleman campaign, who then failed to properly share them with Franken. Without Howell's testimony, the Coleman camp's efforts to show double-counting have been unambiguously damaged.

"The court will issue a written order with further explanation," said Judge Elizabeth Hayden. That further explanation should be interesting to read.

more...

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/02/minnesota-judges-strike-key-coleman-witness-after-failure-to-share-evidence.php?ref=fp1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. K and R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hopefully, this will end soon. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. When does this finally end?
It can't go on forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. As soon as the judges get tired of Coleman dicking around?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hard to say when that will be
Because as soon as the court issues its ruling, Coleman will file a motion to reconsider the ruling. In two weeks, they'll say yes, we really did mean it. Then Coleman will file another motion the exact opposite of the one he just lost, and demand a hearing. The court will set a hearing for two weeks after that, and take the matter under advisement. They will then issue their ruling, and . . .

You get the idea.

As long as the court keeps entertaining motions from the Coleman team, the case stays alive and Coleman doesn't officially lose the election. Without a process for provisional seating, there's no reason for Coleman to quit, and every reason for the monkey wrenchers to keep giving him money to continue the "fight." And without any penalty or sanction for dragging the process out, Coleman will keep filing stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. The time it has taken can hardly be called "forever". Good things come to those who wait.
This part of the process should not take too much longer and this ruling just shows that the judges are on top of things. When these judges rule that Franken is the winner there should be no reason why he will not be certified by the governor and the secretary of state.
I have heard of no suggestion that Franken would not be seated for the duration of every and all of Coleman's appeals, so let him appeal away once these judges make their ruling and Franken joins the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Nail, meet coffin.
I bet their bag of tricks is empty now.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. Peek at crib sheet gets witness' testimony stricken
... Minneapolis election worker Pamela Howell, a Republican, was on the witness stand today to attest to double-counting that only she saw. She was under cross-examination by the Franken side when the court adjourned for a short break — during which Coleman attorney Joe Friedberg gave her notes she’d prepared earlier.

When court resumed, Franken attorney David Lillehaug first demanded to know what the document was and the reason it hadn’t been shared with his team — and then demanded that the court strike Howell’s testimony from the record.

Coleman attorney Tony Trimble’s explanation of the incident as a simple mistake didn’t satisfy the judges. Instead, they had Howell leave the stand having left not an official ripple on the proceedings — though her brief appearance had crashed like an unwelcome wave across the former Republican senator’s deck ...

http://minnesotaindependent.com/27570/coleman-franken-witness-stricken-senate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC