Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In Eisenhower's day, the tax rate for the wealthy was high, yet people were happy..,.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 08:47 PM
Original message
In Eisenhower's day, the tax rate for the wealthy was high, yet people were happy..,.
Where did all this anti-government attitude come from?

Must have been Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stargleamer Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. If they were white many of them were happy. . .
I do agree that the super-rich do need to be heavily taxed. They had windfalls under The Idiot now it's time for them to pay up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Republicans LOVE to talk about the Good Ole' Days....
But they throw a fit at the thought of tax rates of those Good Ole' Days, and they go ballistic when someone suggests imposing tax rates from the Good Ole' Days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. It started before Reagan
It started with Ayn Rand and her book "Atlas Shrugged" and with the help of the backlash of the civil rights laws and the southern strategy of the Republicans.
It is funny but I remember reading back then that Aristotle Onassis was one of the richest men in the world and his estimated wealth was 60 million. Now he would just be a pauper in the circle of the profoundly wealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Ah, Rand...what a frightening ideology
And that's pretty depressing about Onassis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. They were willing to pay taxes as long as they were in control
When the 60s came along, with those uppity blacks and women, they did not want to pay in any longer. They were fine with paying high taxes when they were in control. But ask them to give up their privileges and they would not play along.

This explains the Reagan Resentment. Make us share it with women and people of color and we will show them!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The 60s do explain a lot. Cultural revolution=bad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Tax Rates thru the years (Married Filing Separately)
(Year) (Tax Brackets) (Highest Tax Rate) (Amount Taxed)

1932 (54) 63% -- $1,000,000

1936 (33) 79% -- $5,000,000

1939 (33) 79% -- $5,000,000 (WWII started)
1940 (31) 79% -- $5,000,000
1941 (32) 81% -- $5,000,000

1943 (24) 88% -- $ 200,000

1945 (24) 94% -- $ 200,000 (WWII ends)
1946 (24) 91% -- $ 200,000

1952 (24) 92% -- $ 200,000 (First time Head of Household Tax Rate)
1953 (24) 91% -- $ 200,000

1964 (26) 77% -- $ 200,000
1965 (25) 70% -- $ 100,000

1978 (26) 70% -- $ 101,600
1979 (16) 70% -- $ 107,700

1982 (13) 50% -- $ 42,800
1983 (14) 50% -- $ 54,700
1984 (15) 50% -- $ 81,200
1985 (15) 50% -- $ 84,510
1986 (15) 50% -- $ 87,626
1987 (5) 38.5% -- $45,000
1988 (4) 28.0% -- $113,300
1989 (4) 28.0% -- $117,895
1990 (4) 28.0% -- $123,570
1991 (3) 31.0% -- $41,075
1992 (3) 31.0% -- $43,250
1993 (5) 39.6% -- $125,000

1995 (5) 39.6% -- $128,250
1996 (5) 39.6% -- $131,875
1997 (5) 39.6% -- $135,525
1998 (5) 39.6% -- $139,225
1999 (5) 39.6% -- $141,575
2000 (5) 39.6% -- $144,175
2001 (5) 39.1% -- $148,675
2002 (6) 38.6% -- $153,525
2003 (6) 35.0% -- $155,975
2004 (6) 35.0% -- $155,550
2005 (6) 35.0% -- $163,225
2006 (6) 35.0% -- $168,275
2007 (6) 35.0% -- $174,850
2008 (6) 35.0% -- $178,850
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Let's make them happy again.
Tax their asses!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Maybe they were happy WW2 and the Depression were over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC