Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Conscience' rule on abortions may be overturned

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:23 AM
Original message
'Conscience' rule on abortions may be overturned
:applause:


'Conscience' rule on abortions may be overturned

The Obama administration wants to clarify a Bush policy that lets healthcare workers deny services because of moral beliefs.

By Noam N. Levey
February 27, 2009


Reporting from Washington -- Taking another step into the abortion debate, the Obama administration today will move to rescind a controversial rule that allows healthcare workers to deny abortion counseling or other family planning services if doing so would violate their moral beliefs, according to administration officials.

The rollback of the so-called conscience rule comes just two months after the Bush administration announced it late last year in one of its final policy initiatives.

The new administration's action seems certain to stoke ideological battles between supporters and opponents of abortion rights over the responsibilities of doctors, nurses and other medical workers to their patients.

Seven states, including California, Illinois and Connecticut, and two family-planning groups have filed lawsuits challenging the Bush rule. They argue that it sacrifices the health of patients to the religious beliefs of medical providers.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has reported cases, such as that of a Virginia mother of two who became pregnant after she was denied emergency contraception. In Texas, according to the group, a rape victim had her prescription for emergency contraception rejected by a pharmacist.

more...

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-conscience27-2009feb27,0,6549166.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. It is against my conscience to provide medical care to any republican. I demand that my beliefs
be respected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. If I were a fireman....
an ambulance driver, a teacher, a worker in any office.....

It's always been simple: if you are morally opposed to something, don't do it. If you don't like something, don't take a job where that would be part of the duties.

Glad to see we are heading back to some sane management of occupations v any given person's self chosen moral dilemmas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. CUE THE VONAGE THEME!
Edited on Fri Feb-27-09 09:48 AM by rocktivity
:woohoo:
Well, duh--it's only as unconstitutional as hell. It's not okay to be forced to go against your religious convictions, but it's okay to effectively force your religious convictions upon someone else?

:crazy:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColesCountyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's about time!
My father was a small town general practicioner whose practice was about 25% obstetrics and 25% pediatrics. If asked outside of a professional setting what he personally thought about teenagers having babies, or multiple 'baby daddy'/'baby momma' situations, etc., he could turn the air blue. As a medical professional, however, he delivered the most competent, courteous and sensitive care possible.

So should everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Huh?
Idiot son passed this in the fall of 08 iirc, so I'm happy at the speed this was or will be reversed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColesCountyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. And I'm agreeing with you.
It should been overturned about Jan. 21st, 2009, is all I'm saying...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. OK, agreed. I know Hillary Clinton and Patty Murray
were both all over this when idiot son first put this through. Glad to see action finally, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Good. This rule really pissed me off.
--imm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalsince1968 Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. WTF is Obama being so WISHY WASHY about this? RESCIND the damn thing, already!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC